skip to main content
10.1145/3617695.3617726acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Fast Self-supervised Dual Correlation Window based Stereo Matching

Published:02 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a real-time dual-window-based dense Stereo Correspondence method. Although there have been a large number of related research in decades, Compared with deep learning and global optimization algorithms, correlation window based methods still have the advantages of speed, low memory requirements, and high robustness. The challenge in window-based method is to choose a matching window size that maintains detail and objects’ boundaries at the same time coverage of areas with low or repeated textures. In the face of this trade-off, the classical method prefers to choose a larger window in order to achieve higher robustness.

We tackle this issue from a novel direction by proposing a Fast-Marching sampling algorithm to capture global features from a large window. Then aggregating the result with a small window with higher performance on details and objects’ boundaries to generate costs and perform WTA through a proposed continuous energy function. To verify the performance and feasibility of our method, Middlebury’s Stereo Matching benchmark is used. The experimental results demonstrated that our method can not only capture well the non-textured areas but also the details in the scene.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Jia-Ren Chang and Yong-Sheng Chen. 2018. Pyramid Stereo Matching Network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anette Eltner and Danilo Schneider. 2015. Analysis of different methods for 3D reconstruction of natural surfaces from parallel-axes UAV images. The Photogrammetric Record 30, 151 (2015), 279–299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Fusiello, V. Roberto, and E. Trucco. 1997. Efficient stereo with multiple windowing. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 858–863. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.1997.609428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Andreas Geiger, Martin Roser, and Raquel Urtasun. 2011. Efficient large-scale stereo matching. In Computer Vision–ACCV 2010: 10th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Queenstown, New Zealand, November 8-12, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I 10. Springer, 25–38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Giorgio Grisetti, Rainer Kümmerle, Cyrill Stachniss, and Wolfram Burgard. 2010. A Tutorial on Graph-Based SLAM. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 2, 4 (2010), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2010.939925Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Raj Kumar Gupta and Siu-Yeung Cho. 2013. Window-based approach for fast stereo correspondence. IET Computer Vision 7, 2 (2013), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cvi.2011.0077 arXiv:https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1049/iet-cvi.2011.0077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rostam Affendi Hamzah, Haidi Ibrahim, and Anwar Hasni Abu Hassan. 2017. Stereo matching algorithm based on per pixel difference adjustment, iterative guided filter and graph segmentation. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 42 (2017), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.11.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rostam Affendi Hamzah, A. Fauzan Kadmin, M. Saad Hamid, S. Fakhar A. Ghani, and Haidi Ibrahim. 2018. Improvement of stereo matching algorithm for 3D surface reconstruction. Signal Processing: Image Communication 65 (2018), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2018.04.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Heiko Hirschmuller. 2007. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 30, 2 (2007), 328–341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Heiko Hirschmüller, Peter R Innocent, and Jon Garibaldi. 2002. Real-time correlation-based stereo vision with reduced border errors. International Journal of Computer Vision 47 (2002), 229–246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hiroshi Ishikawa and Davi Geiger. 1998. Occlusions, discontinuities, and epipolar lines in stereo. In Computer Vision—ECCV’98: 5th European Conference on Computer Vision Freiburg, Germany, June, 2–6, 1998 Proceedings, Volume I 5. Springer, 232–248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Kalia, N. Navab, and T. Salcudean. 2019. A Real-Time Interactive Augmented Reality Depth Estimation Technique for Surgical Robotics. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 8291–8297. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Takeo Kanade and Masatoshi Okutomi. 1994. A stereo matching algorithm with an adaptive window: Theory and experiment. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 16, 9 (1994), 920–932.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Qian Long, Qiwei Xie, Seiichi Mita, Kazuhisa Ishimaru, and Noriaki Shirai. 2014. A real-time dense stereo matching method for critical environment sensing in autonomous driving. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2014.6957796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Faisal Mahmood and Nicholas J Durr. 2018. Deep learning and conditional random fields-based depth estimation and topographical reconstruction from conventional endoscopy. Medical image analysis 48 (2018), 230–243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniel Scharstein and Richard Szeliski. 2002. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. International journal of computer vision 47 (2002), 7–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Olga Veksler. 2001. Stereo matching by compact windows via minimum ratio cycle. In Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001, Vol. 1. IEEE, 540–547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. O. Veksler. 2003. Fast variable window for stereo correspondence using integral images. In 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings., Vol. 1. I–I. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kang Zhang, Jiyang Li, Yijing Li, Weidong Hu, Lifeng Sun, and Shiqiang Yang. 2014. Binary Stereo Matching. arxiv:1402.2020 [cs.CV]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Fast Self-supervised Dual Correlation Window based Stereo Matching

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          BDIOT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things
          August 2023
          232 pages
          ISBN:9798400708015
          DOI:10.1145/3617695

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 November 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format