- Edward H Adelson, Charles H Anderson, James R Bergen, Peter J Burt, and Joan M Ogden. 1984. Pyramid methods in image processing. RCA engineer 29, 6 (1984), 33–41.Google Scholar
- Pierre Alliez, David Cohen-Steiner, Olivier Devillers, Bruno Lévy, and Mathieu Desbrun. 2003. Anisotropic polygonal remeshing. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers (2003).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pierre Alliez, Mark Meyer, and Mathieu Desbrun. 2002. Interactive geometry remeshing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 21, 3 (2002), 347–354.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matan Atzmon and Yaron Lipman. 2020. SAL: Sign agnostic learning of shapes from raw data. In Proc. CVPR.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jens Behrmann, D. Duvenaud, and J. Jacobsen. 2019. Invertible Residual Networks. In ICML.Google Scholar
- J. Bloomenthal and B. Wyvill. 1997. Introduction to Implicit Surfaces.Google Scholar
- Mario Botsch, Leif Kobbelt, Mark Pauly, Pierre Alliez, and Bruno Lévy. 2010. Polygon mesh processing. CRC press.Google Scholar
- Peter J Burt and Edward H Adelson. 1987. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. In Readings in computer vision. Elsevier, 671–679.Google Scholar
- Edwin Catmull. 1972. A system for computer generated movies. In Proceedings of the ACM annual conference-Volume 1. 422–431.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tian Qi Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David K Duvenaud. 2018. Neural ordinary differential equations. In NeurIPS.Google Scholar
- Yinbo Chen, Sifei Liu, and Xiaolong Wang. 2021. Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8628–8638.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhiqin Chen and Hao Zhang. 2019. Learning implicit fields for generative shape modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5939–5948.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grigorios Chrysos, Stylianos Moschoglou, Yannis Panagakis, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. 2019. PolyGAN: High-Order Polynomial Generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.06571 (2019).Google Scholar
- B. Curless and M. Levoy. 1996. A volumetric method for building complex models from range images. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (1996).Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Davies, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and A. Jacobson. 2020. On the Effectiveness of Weight-Encoded Neural Implicit 3D Shapes.Google Scholar
- Emilien Dupont, Adam Goliński, Milad Alizadeh, Yee Whye Teh, and Arnaud Doucet. 2021. Coin: Compression with implicit neural representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03123 (2021).Google Scholar
- S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Frederic Besse, Fabio Viola, Ari S. Morcos, Marta Garnelo, Avraham Ruderman, Andrei A. Rusu, Ivo Danihelka, Karol Gregor, 2018. Neural scene representation and rendering. Science 360, 6394 (2018), 1204–1210.Google Scholar
- Rizal Fathony, Anit Kumar Sahu, Devin Willmott, and J. Zico Kolter. 2021. Multiplicative Filter Networks. In ICLR.Google Scholar
- Will Grathwohl, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Jesse Bettencourt, Ilya Sutskever, and David Duvenaud. 2019. FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Models. In ICLR.Google Scholar
- Chiyu Jiang, Avneesh Sud, Ameesh Makadia, Jingwei Huang, Matthias Nießner, and Thomas Funkhouser. 2020. Local implicit grid representations for 3D scenes, In Proc. CVPR. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. W. Jones, J. A. Bærentzen, and M. Srámek. 2006. 3D distance fields: a survey of techniques and applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12 (2006), 581–599.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. 2014. Auto-encoding variational bayes. In ICLR.Google Scholar
- David B. Lindell, Dave Van Veen, Jeong Joon Park, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2022. BACON: Band-limited Coordinate Networks for Multiscale Scene Representation. CVPR (2022).Google Scholar
- Julien N. P. Martel, David B. Lindell, Connor Z. Lin, Eric R. Chan, Marco Monteiro, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2021. ACORN: Adaptive Coordinate Networks for Neural Scene Representation. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH) 40, 4, Article 58 (2021), 13 pages.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lars M. Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, M. Niemeyer, S. Nowozin, and Andreas Geiger. 2019. Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Space. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019), 4455–4465.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mateusz Michalkiewicz, Jhony K Pontes, Dominic Jack, Mahsa Baktashmotlagh, and Anders Eriksson. 2019. Deep level sets: Implicit surface representations for 3d shape inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.06802 (2019).Google Scholar
- Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. 2020. NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis. In Proc. ECCV.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Müller, Fabrice Rousselle, Jan Novák, and Alexander Keller. 2021. Real-Time Neural Radiance Caching for Path Tracing. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 4 (Aug. 2021).Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Museth, D. Breen, R. Whitaker, and A. Barr. 2002. Level set surface editing operators. Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (2002).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin E Newell. 1975. The utilization of procedure models in digital image synthesis. Technical Report. UTAH UNIV SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL OF COMPUTING.Google Scholar
- Michael Niemeyer, Lars Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, and Andreas Geiger. 2020. Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervision. In Proc. CVPR.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Oechsle, Lars Mescheder, Michael Niemeyer, Thilo Strauss, and Andreas Geiger. 2019. Texture Fields: Learning Texture Representations in Function Space. In Proc. ICCV.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Osher and Ronald Fedkiw. 2003. Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces. In Applied mathematical sciences.Google Scholar
- Jeong Joon Park, Peter Florence, Julian Straub, Richard Newcombe, and Steven Lovegrove. 2019a. DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation, In Proc. CVPR. Proc. CVPR.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeong Joon Park, Peter R. Florence, J. Straub, Richard A. Newcombe, and S. Lovegrove. 2019b. DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019), 165–174.Google Scholar
- Songyou Peng, Michael Niemeyer, Lars Mescheder, Marc Pollefeys, and Andreas Geiger. 2020. Convolutional occupancy networks, In Proc. ECCV. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04618.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. 2019. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics 378 (2019), 686–707.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danilo Jimenez Rezende and Shakir Mohamed. 2015. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows. In ICML.Google Scholar
- A. Rosenfeld and J. Pfaltz. 1966. Sequential Operations in Digital Picture Processing. J. ACM 13 (1966), 471–494.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Saito, Zeng Huang, R. Natsume, S. Morishima, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Hao Li. 2019. PIFu: Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution Clothed Human Digitization. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2019), 2304–2314.Google Scholar
- Vishwanath Saragadam, Jasper Tan, Guha Balakrishnan, Richard G Baraniuk, and Ashok Veeraraghavan. 2022. MINER: Multiscale Implicit Neural Representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03532 (2022).Google Scholar
- Rohan Sawhney and Keenan Crane. 2020. Monte Carlo geometry processing. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4 (Aug. 2020).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rohan Sawhney, Bailey Miller, Ioannis Gkioulekas, and Keenan Crane. 2023. Walk on Stars: A Grid-Free Monte Carlo Method for PDEs with Neumann Boundary Conditions. (Feb. 2023). arxiv:2302.11815 [cs.GR]Google Scholar
- Rohan Sawhney, Dario Seyb, Wojciech Jarosz, and Keenan Crane. 2022. Grid-Free Monte Carlo for PDEs with Spatially Varying Coefficients. (Jan. 2022). arxiv:2201.13240 [cs.GR]Google Scholar
- Eero P Simoncelli and William T Freeman. 1995. The steerable pyramid: A flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. In Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 3. IEEE, 444–447.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2020a. Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functions. In Proc. NeurIPS.Google Scholar
- V. Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell, and G. Wetzstein. 2020b. Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functions. ArXiv abs/2006.09661 (2020).Google Scholar
- Vincent Sitzmann, Michael Zollhöfer, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2019. Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representations. In Proc. NeurIPS.Google Scholar
- O. Sorkine-Hornung and M. Alexa. 2007. As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling. In Symposium on Geometry Processing.Google Scholar
- Towaki Takikawa, Joey Litalien, K. Yin, K. Kreis, Charles T. Loop, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, A. Jacobson, M. McGuire, and S. Fidler. 2021. Neural Geometric Level of Detail: Real-time Rendering with Implicit 3D Shapes. ArXiv abs/2101.10994 (2021).Google Scholar
- Matthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Nithin Raghavan, Utkarsh Singhal, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Jonathan T. Barron, and Ren Ng. 2020a. Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains. In Proc. NeurIPS.Google Scholar
- Matthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Nithin Raghavan, Utkarsh Singhal, R. Ramamoorthi, J. T. Barron, and Ren Ng. 2020b. Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains. ArXiv abs/2006.10739 (2020).Google Scholar
- G. Taubin. 1995. A signal processing approach to fair surface design. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (1995).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason Torchinsky. 2013. The First Real Object Ever 3D Scanned And Rendered Was A VW Beetle. Jalopnik (2013). https://jalopnik.com/the-first-real-object-ever-3d-scanned-and-rendered-was-494241353.Google Scholar
- Yiheng Xie, Towaki Takikawa, Shunsuke Saito, Or Litany, Shiqin Yan, Numair Khan, Federico Tombari, James Tompkin, Vincent Sitzmann, and Srinath Sridhar. 2022. Neural fields in visual computing and beyond. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 41. Wiley Online Library, 641–676.Google Scholar
- Lior Yariv, Yoni Kasten, Dror Moran, Meirav Galun, Matan Atzmon, Ronen Basri, and Yaron Lipman. 2020. Multiview Neural Surface Reconstruction by Disentangling Geometry and Appearance. In Proc. NeurIPS.Google Scholar
Recommendations
New Results for Prediction of Chaotic Systems Using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks
AbstractPrediction of nonlinear and dynamic systems is a challenging task, however with the aid of machine learning techniques, particularly neural networks, is now possible to accomplish this objective. Most common neural networks used are the multilayer ...
Interpretation of Artificial Neural Network Overtraining Using Tropical Geometry
We investigate the parameter structure of artificial neural networks with ReLU activation functions by methods of tropical geometry. The main result is a fundamentally new formulation of the problem to detect the onset of neutral network overtraining by ...
Neural Field Convolutions by Repeated Differentiation
Neural fields are evolving towards a general-purpose continuous representation for visual computing. Yet, despite their numerous appealing properties, they are hardly amenable to signal processing. As a remedy, we present a method to perform general ...
Comments