skip to main content
10.1145/3623263.3629154acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Laser Polishing: A Postprocessing Protocol for Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printed Parts Using Existing Tooling

Published: 21 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

3D printed objects produced by fused deposition modeling have functionally and aesthetically unpleasing surfaces due to factors inherent to the process. Although it is possible to reduce the resolution of these artifacts during printing, it is not possible to eliminate them entirely, and thus postprocessing will be required to achieve a smooth surface finish. Many methods of postprocessing require a large amount of time and labor or chemical solvents. Using an unmodified laser cutter as a source of heat, we are able to achieve a great improvement in surface finish with minimal warping and fast cycle time. We propose laser polishing as a method that is simple, safe, low-cost, and uses readily available equipment.

References

[1]
Marc Alexa, Kristian Hildebrand, and Sylvain Lefebvre. 2017. Optimal Discrete Slicing. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 64b (jul 2017), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.2999536
[2]
Karsten Braun, Edgar Willenborg, and Johannes Henrich Schleifenbaum. 2020. Laser polishing as a new post process for 3D-printed polymer parts. Procedia CIRP 94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.026
[3]
Yuan Chai, Rachel W Li, Diana M Perriman, Song Chen, Qing-Hua Qin, and Paul N Smith. 2018. Laser polishing of thermoplastics fabricated using fused deposition modelling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 96 (2018), 4295–4302.
[4]
Lan Chen and Xinzhou Zhang. 2019. Modification the surface quality and mechanical properties by laser polishing of Al/PLA part manufactured by fused deposition modeling. Applied Surface Science 492 (2019), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.252
[5]
Alessandro Colpani, Antonio Fiorentino, and Elisabetta Ceretti. 2019. Characterization of chemical surface finishing with cold acetone vapours on ABS parts fabricated by FDM. Production Engineering Research and Development 13 (june 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00894-3
[6]
Mario Perez Dewey and Durul Ulutan. 2017. Development of Laser Polishing As an Auxiliary Post-Process to Improve Surface Quality in Fused Deposition Modeling Parts(International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Vol. 2: Additive Manufacturing; Materials). https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2017-3024
[7]
Jimmy Etienne, Nicolas Ray, Daniele Panozzo, Samuel Hornus, Charlie C. L. Wang, Jonas Martinez, Sara McMains, Marc Alexa, Brian Wyvill, and Sylvain Lefebvre. 2019. CurviSlicer: Slightly curved slicing for 3-axis printers. ACM Transations on Graphics 38, 4 (july 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323022
[8]
Ruizhen Hu, Honghua Li, Hao Zhang, and Daniel Cohen-Or. 2014. Approximate Pyramidal Shape Decomposition. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 6, Article 213 (nov 2014), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661229.2661244
[9]
Syed H Masood and Wanchai Rattanawong. 2002. A generic part orientation system based on volumetric error in rapid prototyping. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 19 (2002), 209–216.
[10]
P.M. Pandey, N.V. Reddy, and S.G. Dhande. 2003. Real time adaptive slicing for fused deposition modelling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 43, 1 (2003), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00164-5
[11]
Sonette Du Preez, Alyson Johnson, Ryan F. LeBouf, Stephanus J.L. Linde, Aleksandr B. Stefaniak, and Johan Du Plessis. 2018. Exposures during industrial 3-D printing and post-processing tasks. Rapid Prototyping Journal 24, 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0050
[12]
Manuel Sardinha, Carlos M.S. Vicente, Nuno Futuoso, Marco Leite, Relogio Ribeiro, and Luis Reis. 2021. Effect of the ironing process on ABS parts produced by FDM. Material Design and Processing Communications 3, 2 (april 2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.151
[13]
Justin Tyberg and Jan Helge Bøhn. 1999. FDM systems and local adaptive slicing. Materials & Design 20, 2 (1999), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00012-6
[14]
Weiming Wang, Haiyuan Chao, Jing Tong, Zhouwang Yang, Xin Tong, Hang Li, Xiuping Liu, and Ligang Liu. 2015. Saliency-preserving slicing optimization for effective 3D printing. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 34. Wiley Online Library, 148–160.
[15]
W. M. Wang, C. Zanni, and L. Kobbelt. 2016. Improved Surface Quality in 3D Printing by Optimizing the Printing Direction. Computer Graphics Forum 35, 2 (2016), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12811
[16]
Xiaoting Zhang, Xinyi Le, Athina Panotopoulou, Emily Whiting, and Charlie C. L. Wang. 2015. Perceptual Models of Preference in 3D Printing Direction. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 6, Article 215 (nov 2015), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818121

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SCF '23: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication
October 2023
170 pages
ISBN:9798400703195
DOI:10.1145/3623263
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 November 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Additive manufacturing
  2. fused deposition modeling
  3. laser cutter
  4. surface finish
  5. surface polishing

Qualifiers

  • Abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SCF '23
SCF '23: Symposium on Computational Fabrication
October 8 - 10, 2023
NY, New York City, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 71
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media