skip to main content
10.1145/3623462.3623472acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design inspiration translated from the “Proud to be Iban” probes

Published:06 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to present the co-design probes in collaboration with the community and apply the semiotic triangle model to analyse the design probes co-created to simulate design ideas that can be used for future prototyping of the community networks' setup. Five (5) members of the community participated in three (3) activities: one online via a WhatsApp group and two in-person workshops at the community longhouse. The community collected twenty-five (25) values and created seven "Proud to be Iban" design probes. Following the semiotic triangle model, the design probes were analysed with the community and then mapped with the 25 values. Through this generative design process, a few good design ideas were generated, which will be recommendation to the technology design for the implementation of the Bawang Assan community networks in the later stage. It is anticipated that the design of technology based on these findings will assist the community in adopting technology as part of their culture and promote the sustainability of community networks.

References

  1. Aprilya, R., Simamora, A., Budiarti, V., Syafitri, Y. D. T.: Translation Based On Ogden And Richard's Semantic Triangle Theory. JELITA, 1(1), 20-26 (2020)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Asfar, D. A.: Kearifan Lokal Dan Ciri Kebahasaan Teks Naratif Masyarakat Iban. Litera, 2016 15(2), 366-378 (2016)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Belli, L., : The Community Network Manual: How To Build The Internet Yourself (2018), https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/filedepot_download/4391/2376Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belli, L., Hadzic, S.: Community Networks: A Powerful Complementary Strategy to Bridge Digital Divides Sustainably. Community Networks as Enablers of Human Rights, 17. Presented at the World Internet Conference (WIC), Wuzhen Summit (2022)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., Dourish, P.: How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems pp.1077-1086, (2007)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bosch, N. V., Ramos, A. M. G., Samaranch, E. A.: Doing and undoing genders and information and communication technologies. In Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1-2) (2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, E., Binder, T., & Sanders, E. B. N.: Tools And Techniques: Ways To Engage Telling, Making And Enacting. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 145-181). Routledge (2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalmers, L. L.: Ikat Sequences And Social-Cultural Patterns: The Impact Of Industrialization On The Lives Of Iban Artisans In Sarawak. James Cook University of North Queensland (1993)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler, D.: Semiotics For Beginners. (1994)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chavan, A.: The Bollywood Method. Presented in Schaffer, E. Institutionalization of Usability; a Step-by-Step Guide. New York: Adisson Wesley. 129-130 (2004)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Corelia B., Doina P.: Co-Design And Urban Resilience: Visioning Tools For Commoning Resilience Practices. CoDesign. 17, 1 (2017), 83–100. (2017)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Escobar, A.: Designs For The Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, And The Making Of Worlds. Duke University Press (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., Walker, B.,: Cultural Probes And The Value Of Uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), pp. 53–56. (2004)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaver, W., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E.: Cultural Probes. Interactions, 6(1), pp. 21–29 (1999)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Greig, J., Rehman, S. U., Ul-Haq, A., Dresser, G., Burmeister, O. K.: Transforming Ageing in Community: addressing global ageing vulnerabilities through smart communities. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on communities & technologies-transforming communities, pp. 228-238, (2019)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Khalis, F. M., Mustaffa, N.: Cultural Inspirations Towards Malaysian Animation Character Design. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1), 487-501 (2017)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kheirandish, S., Funk, M., Wensveen, S., Verkerk, M., Rauterberg, M.: Huvalue: A Tool To Support Design Students In Considering Human Values In Their Design. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 1015-1041 (2020)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Loh C. W., G., Zaman, T., & Hamid, K. A.: Unleashing Indigenous Iban Values For Collective Technology Design. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022-Volume 2 (pp. 39-46) (2022)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Madden, D., Cadet-James, Y., Atkinson, I., Watkin Lui, F.: Probes And Prototypes: A Participatory Action Research Approach To Co-Design. CoDesign, 10(1), pp. 31–45 (2014)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Mattelmäki, T.: Applying Probes–From Inspirational Notes To Collaborative Insights. CoDesign, 1:2, 83-102 (2005) DOI: 10.1080/15719880500135821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mattelmäki, T., Battarbee, K.: Empathy Probes. In proceedings of Participatory Design Conference 2002 (PDC 2002). pp. 266–271 (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mausch, K., Harris, D., Revilla Diez, J.: Rural aspirations: Reflections For Development Planning, Design And Localized Effects. The European Journal of Development Research 33, 4, 795-808 (2021)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nancy, B., : A Case Study: Broadband Over Powerline For Rural Area Deployment In Sarawak. In E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 242. EDP Sciences (2021)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Nichol, L.: The Essential. London, UK: Routledge (2003)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nik Mohd Nor, N. M. S., Mohamed Idris, A. K., Hashim, N., Tarmazi, S. A. A., Dawi, S. D.: A Study Of Sarawak Ethnic Food “Tuak” As Means Of Communication In Understanding Culture. Gading Journal for Social Sciences, 23(1), 1-5 (2020)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Öğüt, S. T.: Material Culture Of Tea In Turkey: Transformations Of Design Through Tradition, Modernity And Identity. The Design Journal, 12:3, 339-363 (2009). DOI: 10.2752/146069209X12530928086405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Pravin B., Bhaskaran R., Dheeraj S.: Turning 802.11 Inside-Out. In SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 34, 1, 33–38 (2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/972374.972381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pilot project to enhance Internet access for rural folk. In: Borneo Post Online. https://www.theborneopost.com/2018/09/08/pilot-project-to-enhance-internet-access-for-rural-folk (2018)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Reitsma, L.: Dynamics of Respectful Design in Co-Creative and Co-Reflective Encounters with Indigenous Communities. University of Northumbria at Newcastle, United Kingdom, (2015)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Reitsma, L., Light, A., Zaman, T., Rodgers, P.: A Respectful Design Framework. Incorporating indigenous knowledge in the design process. The Design Journal, 22(sup1), 1555-1570 (2019)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rodil, K., Rehm, M., Winschiers-Theophilus, H.: Homestead Creator: Using Card Sorting In Search For Culture-Aware Categorizations Of Interface Objects. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 437-444 (2013)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Probes, Toolkits And Prototypes: Three Approaches To Making In Codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), pp. 5–14. (2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanders, E.B.-N.: Generative Tools For Co-Designing. In A.R.S. Stephen, J.B. Linden, & A.Woodcock, eds. Collaborative design. London, UK: Springer, pp. 3–12 (2000)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Saussure, F.: Course in General Linguistics (trans. Wade Baskin). London: Fontana/Collins ([1916]1974)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Shklovski, I., Palen, L., Sutton, J.: Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 127-136) (2008)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sigau, A. A., Shanat, M.: Utilization Of Semantic Values And Local Community Metaphor In Creating Furniture Identity. In International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 9, Issue 01 (2020)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Tugang, N., Kiyai, G.: The Adaption Of Nature In Iban Cultural Artefact. Jurnal Borneo Arkhailogia (Heritage, Archaeology and History), 7(1), 103-120 (2022)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tunstall, E.: Design Anthropology, Indigenous Knowledge And The Decolization Of Design. Presented at the Fabrica Workshops. Available at: https://vimeo.com/22599259 (2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Turmo Vidal, L., Márquez Segura, E., Parrilla Bel, L., Waern, A.: Training Body Awareness and Control with Technology Probes: A Portfolio of Co-Creative Uses to Support Children with Motor Challenges. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction pp. 823-835, (2020)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Van Rijn, H., Bahk, Y., Stappers, P.J., Lee, K.P.: Three Factors For Contextmapping In East Asia: Trust, Control And Nunchi. CoDesign, 2:3, 157-177 (2006). DOI: 10.1080/15710880600900561Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wahed, W. J. E., Pitil, P. P.: Ngepan Indu Iban: The Aesthetic Features Of Female Iban Costume In Sarawak (2018)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wallace, J., McCarthy, J., Wright, P.C.: Making Design Probes Work. In proceedings of CHI’13 conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, pp.3441–3450 (2013)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Winschiers-Theophilus H, Winschiers-Goagoses N, Rodil K, Blake E, Zaman T, Kapuire GK, Kamukuenjandje R.: Moving Away From Erindi-Roukambe: Transferability Of A Rural Community- Based Co-Design. InIFIP WG 9:363–374 (2013)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Zaman, T., Stanley, C.: A Classification Of Cultural Engagements In Community Technology Design: Introducing A Transcultural Approach. Ai & Society, 34, 419-435 (2019)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Winschiers-Theophilus, H.: The Challenges Of Participatory Design In A Intercultural Context: Designing For Usability In Namibia. In PDC (pp. 73-76) (2006)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Zaman, T., : Using Sketches To Communicate Interaction Protocols Of An Indigenous Community. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops-Volume 2 (2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Zaman, T., Loh C. W. G., Falak, S.: eTourism and Cultural Resilience: Exploring Opportunities for Indigenous Communities in an Extremely Precarious State. In Pandemic, Lockdown, and Digital Transformation. Springer, Cham, 65-78 (2021)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design inspiration translated from the “Proud to be Iban” probes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        KUI '23: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Culture and Computer Science: Code and Materiality
        September 2023
        190 pages
        ISBN:9798400708367
        DOI:10.1145/3623462
        • Editors:
        • Lucas Fabian Olivero,
        • António Bandeira Araújo

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 December 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format