An empirical study to design interactions with historical buildings used for everyday activities
Authors: 
Linda Hirsch, 
Daniel Buschek, 
Eileen Einwächter, Louisa Bekker, Andreas ButzAuthors Info & Claims
Linda Hirsch, Daniel Buschek, Eileen Einwächter, Louisa Bekker, Andreas ButzAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 8, Pages 1 - 12
Abstract
Many historical buildings are challenged to comply with their dual purpose of being society's living memory and being used for everyday activities, such as a place to work or study. Direct interactions with such buildings could counteract this challenge and integrate their historical significance with contemporary needs. However, there is a lack of knowledge about designing this. We approached the gap in an iterative design process by conducting four expert interviews and two building walks with N=16 building users at a public historical building. Our results highlight the importance for building users to integrate historical significance and contemporary needs into their routines to increase their connection to the building and its past users. We provide three design implications for designing the interaction with historical buildings in everyday life and emphasize research implications for future projects. Our findings emphasize the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between Human-computer interaction research areas.
References
[1]
Proton Technologies AG. 2020(last visited Mar. 20th 2022.). General Data Protection Regulation Information. https://gdpr.eu/
[2]
Hamed S. Alavi, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Mikael Wiberg, Denis Lalanne, Peter Dalsgaard, Ava Fatah gen Schieck, and Yvonne Rogers. 2019. Introduction to Human-Building Interaction (HBI): Interfacing HCI with Architecture and Urban Design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact 26, Article 6 (2019), 10 pages. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309714
[3]
Margarita Angelidou, Eleni Karachaliou, Tatiana Angelidou, and E. Stylianidis. 2017. CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SMART CITY ENVIRONMENTS. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W5, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs- archives-XLII-2-W5-27-2017
[4]
Margarita Angelidou and E. Stylianidis. 2020. CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SMART CITY ENVIRONMENTS: THE UPDATE. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences V-2-2020 (08 2020), 957–964. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-957- 2020
[5]
James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: Crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (2013), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276
[6]
Francesco Bandarin and Ron van Oers. 2012. The Historic Urban Landscape Managing heritage in an urban century (1 ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. XIII pages.
[7]
Diego A. Barrado-Timón and Hidalgo-Giralt. 2019. The Historical City, Its Transmission and Perception via Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality and the Use of the Past as a Resource for the Present: A New Era for Urban Cultural Heritage and Tourism? Sustainability 11 (05 2019), 2835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102835
[8]
A. Bogner, B. Littig, and W. Menz. 2009. Interviewing Experts. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://books.google.de/books?id=m5SGDAAAQBAJ
[9]
Ann Borda and Jonathan Bowen. 2017. Smart Cities and Cultural Heritage – A Review of Developments and Future Opportunities. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2017.2
[10]
Torie Bosch. 2012. Sci-Fi Writer Bruce Sterling Explains the Intriguing New Concept of Design Fiction. https://slate.com/technology/2012/03/bruce- sterling-on-design-fictions.html
[11]
Steward Brand. 1994. How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built. Viking. 245 pages. https://books.google.de/books?id=68DYAAAAMAAJ
[12]
Stewart Brand. 1995. How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built. Penguin Group US. libgen.li/file.php?md5= d66249fa023f9b6853112d60cc80fad5
[13]
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Nikki Hayfield, and Gareth Terry. 2019. Thematic Analysis BT - Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. (2019), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
[14]
S. Brusaporci, F. Graziosi, F. Franchi, and P. Maiezza. 2019. Remediating the Historical City. Ubiquitous Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage Enhancement. In Proceedings of the 1st International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Digital Environments for Education, Arts and Heritage, Alessandro Luigini (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 305–313.
[15]
Licia Calvi. 2020. What Do We Know about AR Storytelling? In Proceedings of the 6th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (Antwerp, Belgium) (GoodTechs ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 278–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411170.3411171
[16]
Ana Caraban, Evangelos Karapanos, Daniel Gonçalves, and Pedro Campos. 2019. 23 Ways to Nudge: A Review of Technology-Mediated Nudging in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 503, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300733
[17]
Luigina Ciolfi and Daniela Petrelli. 2015. Studying a Community of Volunteers at a Historic Cemetery to Inspire Interaction Concepts. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Limerick, Ireland) (C&T ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768547
[18]
Luigina Ciolfi, Daniela Petrelli, Robin Goldberg, Nick Dulake, Matt Willox, Mark Marshall, and Fabio Caparrelli. 2013. Exploring historical, social and natural heritage: challenges for tangible interaction design at Sheffield General Cemetery. In NODEM 2013: Beyond control - the collaborative museum and its challenges. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/9497/
[19]
Sandy Claes and Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. The Role of Tangible Interaction in Exploring Information on Public Visualization Displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Saarbruecken, Germany) (PerDis ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757733
[20]
Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, Martyn Dade-Robertson, Simon J. Bowen, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. Contesting the city: Enacting the political through digitally supported urban walks. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2015-April, May (2015), 2853–2862. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702176
[21]
Sytse De Maat. 2015. On The Symbiosis of People and Building The Perfect Slum. 6459 (2015), 373.
[22]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press.
[23]
Daniele Duranti. 2017. Tangible Interaction in Museums and Cultural Heritage Sites: Towards a Conceptual and Design Framework.
[24]
Samantha Mitchell Finnigan and Adrian Clear. 2018. "What are your thoughts on this place?": A Living-Lab Approach to Building Engagement and Evaluation. In In Living Labs: Measuring Human Experience in the Built Environment (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/33618
[25]
Patrick Fischer and Eva Hornecker. 2011. Urban HCI – Interaction Patterns in the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2011.2
[26]
E. Goffman. 2008. Behavior in Public Places. Free Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=EM1NNzcR-V0C
[27]
Denis Gračanin, Mohamed Eltoweissy, Liang Cheng, and Reza Tasooji. 2018. Reconfigurable Spaces and Places in Smart Built Environments: A Service Centric Approach. 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92285-0_63
[28]
Nor Zalina Harun, Mazlina Mansor, and Ismail Said. 2015. Place Rootedness Suggesting the Loss and Survival of Historical Public Spaces. Procedia Environmental Sciences 28 (2015), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.063 The 5th Sustainable Future for Human Security (SustaiN 2014).
[29]
Linda Hirsch, Robin Welsch, Beat Rossmy, and Andreas Butz. 2022. Embedded AR Storytelling Supports Active Indexing at Historical Places. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501328
[30]
Y Hong. 2020. Influence of architectural heritage on the identity and present-day value of American-designed universities’ campuses in Asia. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-020-00015-5
[31]
Eva Hornecker. 2010. Interactions around a Contextually Embedded System. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (TEI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709916
[32]
Eva Hornecker. 2016. The To-and-Fro of Sense Making: Supporting Users’ Active Indexing in Museums. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 23, 2, Article 10 (May 2016), 48 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882785
[33]
Eva Hornecker and Matthias Stifter. 2006. Learning from Interactive Museum Installations about Interaction Design for Public Settings. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments (Sydney, Australia) (OZCHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228201
[34]
Farrokh Jazizadeh and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. 2012. Toward Adaptive Comfort Management in Office Buildings Using Participatory Sensing for End User Driven Control. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (BuildSys ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8.
[35]
Stine S. Johansen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2019. Temporal Constraints in Human–Building Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 2, Article 8 (April 2019), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301424
[36]
Siân Jones. 2016. Wrestling with the Social Value of Heritage: Problems, Dilemmas and Opportunities. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage 4 (07 2016), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2016.1193996
[37]
Ellis Judson and Usha Iyer-Raniga. 2010. Reinterpreting the value of built heritage for sustainable development.
[38]
Yu Kao. 2021. Storystamp: Evaluating the Impact of a Place-Oriented Approach for Placemaking. In Media Architecture Biennale 20 (Amsterdam and Utrecht, Netherlands) (MAB20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469410.3469433
[39]
Reyhaneh Karimi, LeiLa Farahzadi, Samad Sepasgozar, Sharifeh Sargolzaei, Sanee Sepasgozar, Mohsen Zareian, and Akram Nasrolahi. 2021. Smart Built Environment Including Smart Home, Smart Building and Smart City: Definitions and Applied Technologies. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95104
[40]
Jens Krösche, Jörg Baldzer, and Susanne Boll. 2004. MobiDENK-Mobile Multimedia in Monument Conservation. IEEE MultiMedia 11, 2 (April 2004), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2004.1289043
[41]
Marieke Kuipers and Wessel de Jong. 2017. Designing from Heritage - Strategies for Conservation and Conversion. NY: Basic Books, Delft. 33 pages. https://books.bk.tudelft.nl/index.php/press/catalog/view/isbn.9789461868022/529/170-1
[42]
Tarun Kumar and Monto Mani. 2019. Discerning Occupant Psychosocial Behaviour in Smart Built Environment and Its Design (UrbSys’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363459.3363534
[43]
Stephen D. Laycock, Graham D. Bell, David B. Mortimore, Mark K. Greco, Nick Corps, and Irving Finkle. 2013. Combining X-Ray Micro-CT Technology and 3D Printing for the Digital Preservation and Study of a 19th Century Cantonese Chess Piece with Intricate Internal Structure. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 5, 4, Article 13 (Jan. 2013), 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399180.2399181
[44]
Matthew Lee-Smith, Tracy Ross, Martin Maguire, Fung Po Tso, Jeremy Morley, and Stefano Cavazzi. 2019. The Data Hungry Home. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (HTTF 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363390
[45]
Larry Leifer. 2008. The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious. Design Issues 24 (07 2008), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.72
[46]
Huiming Liu and Bin Li. 2021. Changes of Spatial Characteristics: Socio-Cultural Sustainability in Historical Neighborhood in Beijing, China. Sustainability 13, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116212
[47]
Elina Luiro, Petri Hannula, Emilia Launne, Sanni Mustonen, Toni Westerlund, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2019. Exploring Local History and Cultural Heritage through a Mobile Game. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 42, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3368411
[48]
Stine S. Lundgaard, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2019. Temporal Constraints in Human–Building Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 2, Article 8 (April 2019), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301424
[49]
F. Marulli and L. Vallifuoco. 2017. Internet of Things for Driving Human-like Interactions: A Case Study for Cultural Smart Environment. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of Things, Data and Cloud Computing (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (ICC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 130, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018896.3036373
[50]
A. H. Maslow. 1948. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (1948), 370–396. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
[51]
Amaia Mesanza-Moraza, Ismael García-Gómez, and Agustín Azkarate. 2021. Machine Learning for the Built Heritage Archaeological Study. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 14, 1, Article 10 (Dec. 2021), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422993
[52]
Samantha Mitchell Finnigan and Adrian K. Clear. 2020. "No Powers, Man!": A Student Perspective on Designing University Smart Building Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376174
[53]
Julien Nembrini and Denis Lalanne. 2017. Human-Building Interaction: When the Machine Becomes a Building. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017, Regina Bernhaupt, Girish Dalvi, Anirudha Joshi, Devanuj K. Balkrishan, Jacki O'Neill, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 348–369.
[54]
Eslam Nofal, Georgia Panagiotidou, Rabee M. Reffat, Hendrik Hameeuw, Vanessa Boschloos, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2020. Situated Tangible Gamification of Heritage for Supporting Collaborative Learning of Young Museum Visitors. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 1, Article 3 (Feb. 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3350427
[55]
Eslam Nofal, Rabee Reffat, Vanessa Boschloos, Hendrik Hameeuw, and Andrew Moere. 2018. The Role of Tangible Interaction to Communicate Tacit Knowledge of Built Heritage. Heritage 1, 2 (2018), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage1020028
[56]
Tobias Nöll, Johannes Köhler, Gerd Reis, and Didier Stricker. 2015. Fully Automatic, Omnidirectional Acquisition of Geometry and Appearance in the Context of Cultural Heritage Preservation. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 8, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2015), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629693
[57]
Ville Paananen, Jonas Oppenlaender, Jorge Goncalves, Danula Hettiachchi, and Simo Hosio. 2021. Investigating Human Scale Spatial Experience. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, ISS, Article 496 (nov 2021), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488541
[58]
Daniela Petrelli, Luigina Ciolfi, Dick van Dijk, Eva Hornecker, Elena Not, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Integrating Material and Digital: A New Way for Cultural Heritage. Interactions 20, 4 (July 2013), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486239
[59]
Joseph Pierce and Mary Lawhon. 2015. Walking as Method: Toward Methodological Forthrightness and Comparability in Urban Geographical Research. Professional Geographer 67, 4 (2015), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1059401
[60]
Geerte M. Savenije and Pieter de Bruijn. 2017. Historical empathy in a museum: uniting contextualisation and emotional engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies 23, 9 (2017), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1339108
[61]
Holger Schnädelbach, Nils Jäger, and Lachlan Urquhart. 2019. Adaptive Architecture and Personal Data. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 2, Article 12 (March 2019), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301426
[62]
Elmedin Selmanović, Selma Rizvic, Carlo Harvey, Dusanka Boskovic, Vedad Hulusic, Malek Chahin, and Sanda Sljivo. 2020. Improving Accessibility to Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation Using Virtual Reality. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 2, Article 13 (May 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377143
[63]
M Sepe. 2012. Principles for place identity enhancement: a sustainable challenge for changes to the contemporary city. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 155 (2012), 993–1004.
[64]
Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi and Giuseppe De Luca. 2019. Specifying the Significance of Historic Sites in Heritage Planning. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage 18 (03 2019), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/9225
[65]
Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris. 1999. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events. Perception 28 (02 1999), 1059–74. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2952
[66]
Konstantina Siountri, Emmanouil Skondras, and Dimitrios Vergados. 2018. A Delivery Model for Cultural Heritage Services in Smart Cities Environments: 7th International Conference, EuroMed 2018, Nicosia, Cyprus, October 29 – November 3, 2018, Proceedings, Part II. 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-01765-1_31
[67]
Konstantina Siountri and Dimitrios Vergados. 2019. SMART CULTURAL HERITAGE IN DIGITAL CITIES. 1b/2018 (09 2019), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.26341/issn.2241-4002-2018-1b-2
[68]
Anna Skoura. 2018. History of use: the cultural heritage of everyday streets.
[69]
Lucy A. Sparrow, Martin Gibbs, and Michael Arnold. 2021. The Ethics of Multiplayer Game Design and Community Management: Industry Perspectives and Challenges. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[70]
Youngjung Suh, Choonsung Shin, and Woontack Woo. 2009. A mobile phone guide: spatial, personal, and social experience for cultural heritage. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 55, 4 (2009), 2356–2364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2009.5373810
[71]
Silvia Torsi, Carmelo Ardito, and Cristina Rebek. 2020. An Interactive Narrative to Improve Cultural Heritage Experience in Elementary School Children. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 3, Article 22 (Aug. 2020), 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382771
[72]
Dell Upton. 2002. Architecture in Everyday Life. New Literary History 33, 4 (2002), 707–723. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20057752
[73]
Himanshu Verma, Hamed S. Alavi, and Denis Lalanne. 2017. Studying Space Use: Bringing HCI Tools to Architectural Projects. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3856–3866.
[74]
Mikael Wiberg. 2015. Interaction Design Meets Architectural Thinking. Interactions 22, 2 (feb 2015), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2732936
[75]
Alexander Wiethoff and Heinrich Hussmann. 2017. Media Architecture: Using Information and Media as Construction Material. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. 1 page.
[76]
Christine Wolf, Kathryn E. Ringland, and Gillian Hayes. 2019. Home Worlds: Situating Domestic Computing in Everyday Life Through a Study of DIY Home Repair. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 161 (nov 2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359263
[77]
Xuejun Zhou, Hongjiang Lv, and Xiaorong Hao. 2021. The Influence of Place Attachment and Leisure Benefits on Tourist Satisfaction and Tourist Loyalty: A Case Study of Internet-Famous City. In 2021 4th International Conference on Information Management and Management Science (Chengdu, China) (IMMS 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485190.3485206%3c/bib>
Index Terms
- An empirical study to design interactions with historical buildings used for everyday activities
Recommendations
Design Interactions in ?elәwkw: Belongings
DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsOur pictorial visually describes ?elәwkw -- Belongings, an interactive tangible tabletop installed in the Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia. The tabletop was designed to communicate the continuity of Musqueam culture, convey ...
Study on Contents and Methods of Historical and Cultural Village Planning and Design Based on Daliangjiang Historical and Cultural Village, Jingxing County, Hebei Province
ICETCE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Second International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil EngineeringHistorical and Cultural Village, as an important component of Chinese cultural heritage, not only possesses the basic nature of village but also has special historical culture characteristics. This paper exemplifies Daliangjiang village, Jingxing County,...
The Design Methods of Augmented Reality in a Historical Site
ICVARS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality SimulationsAugmented reality (AR) technology has the potential to enhance the visitor experience at historical and cultural sites by providing rich, interactive information about the site's history and culture. In our project to develop an AR guide app for a ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2023
190 pages
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 06 December 2023
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
KUI '23
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 85Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)60
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format