skip to main content
10.1145/3623509.3633349acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PneuMa: Designing Pneumatic Bodily Extensions for Supporting Movement in Everyday Life

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prior research around the design of interactive systems has highlighted the benefits of supporting embodiment in everyday life. This resulted in the creation of body-centric systems that leverage movement. However, these advances supporting movement in everyday life, aligning with the embodiment theory, so far focused on sensing movement as opposed to facilitating movement. We present PneuMa, a novel wearable system that can facilitate movement in everyday life through pneumatic-based bodily extensions. We showcase the system through three examples: "Pardon?", moving the ear forward; "Greetings", moving a hand towards the "Bye-bye" gesture; "Take a break", moving the hands away from the keyboard, enabling the bodily extensions that support movement in everyday life. From the thematic analysis of a field study with 12 participants, we identified three themes: bodily awareness, Perception of the scenarios, and anticipating movement. We discuss our findings in relation to prior research around bodily extensions and embodied interaction to provide strategies to design bodily extensions that support movement in everyday life. Ultimately, we hope that our work helps more people profit from the benefits of everyday movement support.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

PneuMa_Final.mp4

mp4

180.4 MB

References

  1. Saliha Akbas, Asim Evren Yantac, Terry Eskenazi, Kemal Kuscu, Sinem Semsioglu, Onur Topal Sumer, and Asli Ozturk. 2022. Virtual Dance Mirror: A Functional Approach to Avatar Representation through Movement in Immersive VR. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Movement and Computing (Chicago, IL, USA) (MOCO ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537972.3538003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Catarina Allen d’Ávila Silveira, Ozgun Kilic Afsar, and Sarah Fdili Alaoui. 2022. Wearable Choreographer: Designing Soft-Robotics for Dance Practice. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 1581–1596. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christoph Amma, Thomas Krings, Jonas Böer, and Tanja Schultz. 2015. Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density Electromyography. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702501Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, Justin Matejka, and George Fitzmaurice. 2013. YouMove: enhancing movement training with an augmented reality mirror. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology(UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Josh Andres, m.c. schraefel, Nathan Semertzidis, Brahmi Dwivedi, Yutika C. Kulwe, Juerg von Kaenel, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2020. Introducing Peripheral Awareness as a Neurological State for Human-Computer Integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jumpei Arata, Masashi Hattori, Shohei Ichikawa, and Masamichi Sakaguchi. 2014. Robotically Enhanced Rubber Hand Illusion. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 7, 4 (Oct. 2014), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2014.2304722 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Haptics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jatin Arora, Kartik Mathur, Aryan Saini, and Aman Parnami. 2019. Gehna: Exploring the Design Space of Jewelry as an Input Modality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Saskia Bakker, Alissa N. Antle, and Elise Van Den Hoven. 2012. Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 4 (April 2012), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0410-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Arpit Bhatia, Dhruv Kundu, Suyash Agarwal, Varnika Kairon, and Aman Parnami. 2021. Soma-noti: Delivering Notifications Through Under-clothing Wearables. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Arpit Bhatia, Aryan Saini, Isha Kalra, Manideepa Mukherjee, and Aman Parnami. 2023. DUMask: A Discrete and Unobtrusive Mask-Based Interface for Facial Gestures. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2023 (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (AHs ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582700.3582726Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative Hci Research: Going Behind the Scenes. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Oğuz ’Oz’ Buruk, Louise Petersen Matjeka, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. 2023. Towards Designing Playful Bodily Extensions: Learning from Expert Interviews. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yuxin Chen, Zhuolin Yang, Ruben Abbou, Pedro Lopes, Ben Y. Zhao, and Haitao Zheng. 2021. User Authentication via Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445441Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Azzurra Chiri, Nicola Vitiello, Francesco Giovacchini, Stefano Roccella, Fabrizio Vecchi, and Maria Chiara Carrozza. 2012. Mechatronic Design and Characterization of the Index Finger Module of a Hand Exoskeleton for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 17, 5 (Oct. 2012), 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2011.2144614 Conference Name: IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Michael Cicone, Wendy Wapner, Nancy Foldi, Edgar Zurif, and Howard Gardner. 1979. The relation between gesture and language in aphasic communication. Brain and Language 8, 3 (Nov. 1979), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(79)90060-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sharice Clough and Melissa C. Duff. 2020. The Role of Gesture in Communication and Cognition: Implications for Understanding and Treating Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14 (Aug. 2020), 323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00323Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Susan Wagner Cook, Terina KuangYi Yip, and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2010. Gesturing makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 4 (2010), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jefferson Costales, Janice Abellana, Joel Gracia, and Madhavi Devaraj. 2022. A Learning Assessment Applying Pomodoro Technique as A Productivity Tool for Online Learning. In 2021 13th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers(ICETC 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498765.3498844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Katinka Dijkstra, Michael P. Kaschak, and Rolf A. Zwaan. 2007. Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition 102, 1 (Jan. 2007), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. –256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Shreyosi Endow, Hedieh Moradi, Anvay Srivastava, Esau G Noya, and Cesar Torres. 2021. Compressables: A Haptic Prototyping Toolkit for Wearable Compression-based Interfaces. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021(DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462057Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Cumhur Erkut and Sofia Dahl. 2017. Embodied Interaction through Movement in a Course Work. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing (London, United Kingdom) (MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Thecla Schiphorst, Shannon Cuykendall, Kristin Carlson, Karen Studd, and Karen Bradley. 2015. Strategies for Embodied Design: The Value and Challenges of Observing Movement. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Fontana, A. Dettori, F. Salsedo, and M. Bergamasco. 2009. Mechanical design of a novel Hand Exoskeleton for accurate force displaying. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 1704–1709. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152591 ISSN: 1050-4729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Radhika Ghosal, Bhavika Rana, Ishan Kapur, and Aman Parnami. 2019. Rapid Prototyping of Pneumatically Actuated Inflatable Structures. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’19 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332167.3357121Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kristian Gohlke, Wolfgang Sattler, and Eva Hornecker. 2022. AirPinch – An Inflatable Touch Fader with Pneumatic Tactile Feedback. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3505568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sebastian Günther, Mohit Makhija, Florian Müller, Dominik Schön, Max Mühlhäuser, and Markus Funk. 2019. PneumAct: Pneumatic Kinesthetic Actuation of Body Joints in Virtual Reality Environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sebastian Günther, Dominik Schön, Florian Müller, Max Mühlhäuser, and Martin Schmitz. 2020. PneumoVolley: Pressure-based Haptic Feedback on the Head through Pneumatic Actuation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kate Hartman, Boris Kourtoukov, Izzie Colpitts-Campbell, and Erin Lewis. 2020. Monarch V2: An Iterative Design Approach to Prototyping a Wearable Electronics Project. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2215–2227. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pilwon Heo, Gwang Min Gu, Soo-jin Lee, Kyehan Rhee, and Jung Kim. 2012. Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 13, 5 (May 2012), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0107-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sheng-Pei Hu and June-Hao Hou. 2019. Pneu-Multi-Tools: Auto-Folding and Multi-Shapes Interface by Pneumatics in Virtual Reality. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 36–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332167.3357107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Francesco Ianì. 2019. Embodied memories: Reviewing the role of the body in memory processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26, 6 (Dec. 2019), 1747–1766. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01674-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Jakob Karolus, Felix Bachmann, Thomas Kosch, Albrecht Schmidt, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2021. Facilitating Bodily Insights Using Electromyography-Based Biofeedback during Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction(MobileHCI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ozgun Kilic Afsar, Ali Shtarbanov, Hila Mor, Ken Nakagaki, Jack Forman, Karen Modrei, Seung Hee Jeong, Klas Hjort, Kristina Höök, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2021. OmniFiber: Integrated Fluidic Fiber Actuators for Weaving Movement based Interactions into the ‘Fabric of Everyday Life’. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1010–1026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Subin Kim, Sangsu Jang, Jin-young Moon, Minjoo Han, and Young-Woo Park. 2022. Slide2Remember: an Interactive Wall Frame Enriching Reminiscence Experiences by Providing Re-encounters of Taken Photos and Heard Music in a Similar Period. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533456Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. KirshDavid. 2013. Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) (April 2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442109 Publisher: ACM PUB27 New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. J. Knibbe, A. Alsmith, and K. Hornbæk. 2018. Experiencing Electrical Muscle Stimulation. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (Sept. 2018), 118:1–118:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Joseph La Delfa, Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Rakesh Patibanda, Hazel Ngari, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2020. Drone Chi: Somaesthetic Human-Drone Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376786Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Richard Li, Jason Wu, and Thad Starner. 2019. TongueBoard: An Oral Interface for Subtle Input. In Proceedings of the 10th Augmented Human International Conference 2019 (Reims, France) (AH2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311823.3311831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Zhuying Li, Tianze Huang, Rakesh Patibanda, and Florian Mueller. 2023. AI in the Shell: Towards an Understanding of Integrated Embodiment. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Shu-Yang Lin, Chao-Huai Su, Kai-Yin Cheng, Rong-Hao Liang, Tzu-Hao Kuo, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2011. Pub - point upon body: exploring eyes-free interaction and methods on an arm. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology(UIST ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047259Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, Willi Mueller, Daniel Hoffmann, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Proprioceptive Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Alexandra Ion, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Adding Force Feedback to Mixed Reality Experiences and Games using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: The Humanities Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hedieh Moradi and César Torres. 2020. Siloseam: A Morphogenetic Workflow for the Design and Fabrication of Inflatable Silicone Bladders. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1995–2006. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395473Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Kristian Mortensen. 2016. The Body as a Resource for Other-Initiation of Repair: Cupping the Hand Behind the Ear. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49, 1 (2016), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126450 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126450Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Tuomas Kari, Zhuying Li, Yan Wang, Yash Dhanpal Mehta, Josh Andres, Jonathan Marquez, and Rakesh Patibanda. 2020. Towards Designing Bodily Integrated Play. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374931Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Florian Floyd Mueller, Pedro Lopes, Paul Strohmeier, Wendy Ju, Caitlyn Seim, Martin Weigel, Suranga Nanayakkara, Marianna Obrist, Zhuying Li, Joseph Delfa, Jun Nishida, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Dag Svanaes, Jonathan Grudin, Stefan Greuter, Kai Kunze, Thomas Erickson, Steven Greenspan, Masahiko Inami, Joe Marshall, Harald Reiterer, Katrin Wolf, Jochen Meyer, Thecla Schiphorst, Dakuo Wang, and Pattie Maes. 2020. Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Prabhakar Naik, Jayant Unde, Bhushan Darekar, and S. S. Ohol. 2019. Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Powered Exoskeleton. In Proceedings of the Advances in Robotics 2019. ACM, Chennai India, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3352593.3352627Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Shreyas Nisal, Rakesh Patibanda, Aryan Saini, Elise Van Den Hoven, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2022. TouchMate: Understanding the Design of Body Actuating Games using Physical Touch. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505270.3558332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Jun Nishida, Soichiro Matsuda, Hiroshi Matsui, Shan-Yuan Teng, Ziwei Liu, Kenji Suzuki, and Pedro Lopes. 2020. HandMorph: a Passive Exoskeleton that Miniaturizes Grasp. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415875Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Victoria Oguntosin and Ademola Abdulkareem. 2020. Design of a pneumatic soft actuator controlled via eye tracking and detection. Heliyon 6, 7 (July 2020), e04388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Nathalie Overdevest, Rakesh Patibanda, Aryan Saini, Elise Van Den Hoven, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. 2023. Towards Designing for Everyday Embodied Remembering: Findings from a Diary Study. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2611–2624. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3595999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Rakesh Patibanda, Chris Hill, Aryan Saini, Xiang Li, Yuzheng Chen, Andrii Matviienko, Jarrod Knibbe, Elise van den Hoven, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. 2023. Auto-Paizo Games: Towards Understanding the Design of Games That Aim to Unify a Player’s Physical Body and the Virtual World. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CHI PLAY (Oct. 2023), 408:893–408:918. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Rakesh Patibanda, Xiang Li, Yuzheng Chen, Aryan Saini, Christian N Hill, Elise van den Hoven, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2021. Actuating Myself: Designing Hand-Games Incorporating Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483464Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Rakesh Patibanda, Florian “Floyd” Mueller, Matevz Leskovsek, and Jonathan Duckworth. 2017. Life Tree: Understanding the Design of Breathing Exercise Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Rakesh Patibanda, Aryan Saini, Nathalie Overdevest, Maria F. Montoya, Xiang Li, Yuzheng Chen, Shreyas Nisal, Josh Andres, Jarrod Knibbe, Elise van den Hoven, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. 2023. Fused Spectatorship: Designing Bodily Experiences Where Spectators Become Players. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CHI PLAY (Oct. 2023), 403:769–403:802. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Rakesh Patibanda, Nathan Arthur Semertzidis, Michaela Scary, Joseph Nathan La Delfa, Josh Andres, Mehmet Aydin Baytaş, Anna Lisa Martin-Niedecken, Paul Strohmeier, Bruno Fruchard, Sang-won Leigh, Elisa D. Mekler, Suranga Nanayakkara, Josef Wiemeyer, Nadia Berthouze, Kai Kunze, Thanassis Rikakis, Aisling Kelliher, Kevin Warwick, Elise van den Hoven, Florian Floyd Mueller, and Steve Mann. 2020. Motor Memory in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Victoria Peng. 2021. Wigglears: Wiggle Your Ears With Your Emotions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Champika Ranasinghe, Max Pfeiffer, Sven Heitmann, and Christian Kray. 2019. Evaluating User Experience under Location Quality Variations: A Framework for in-the-wild Studies. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services(MobileHCI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3344392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Emanuele Lindo Secco and Andualem Maereg Tadesse. 2020. A Wearable Exoskeleton for Hand Kinesthetic Feedback in Virtual Reality. In Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, Gregory M.P. O’Hare, Michael J. O’Grady, John O’Donoghue, and Patrick Henn (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 186–200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Nathan Arthur Semertzidis, Annaelle Li Pin Hiung, Michaela Jayne Vranic-Peters, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. 2023. Dozer: Towards understanding the design of closed-loop wearables for sleep. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Tanmay Shankar and Santosh K. Dwivedy. 2015. A Hybrid Assistive Wheelchair-Exoskeleton. In Proceedings of the international Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology(i-CREATe 2015). Singapore Therapeutic, Assistive & Rehabilitative Technologies (START) Centre, Midview City, SGP, 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Lawrence Shapiro and Shannon Spaulding. 2021. Embodied Cognition. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2021 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/embodied-cognition/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Dag Svanaes and Martin Solheim. 2016. Wag Your Tail and Flap Your Ears: The Kinesthetic User Experience of Extending Your Body. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3778–3779. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty’s phenomenology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1 (April 2013), 8:1–8:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Dag Svanæs and Louise Barkhuus. 2020. The Designer’s Body as Resource in Design: Exploring Combinations of Point-of-view and Tense. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Ozgun Kilic Afsar, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Nadia Campo Woytuk, and Madeline Balaam. 2020. Designing with Intimate Materials and Movements: Making "Menarche Bits". In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395592Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Shan-Yuan Teng, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Chi Wang, Chi-huan Chiang, Da-Yuan Huang, Liwei Chan, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2018. PuPoP: Pop-up Prop on Palm for Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Berlin Germany, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Shan-Yuan Teng, K. D. Wu, Jacqueline Chen, and Pedro Lopes. 2022. Prolonging VR Haptic Experiences by Harvesting Kinetic Energy from the User. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Kohei Umezawa, Yuta Suzuki, Gowrishankar Ganesh, and Yoichi Miyawaki. 2022. Bodily ownership of an independent supernumerary limb: an exploratory study. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (Feb. 2022), 2339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06040-x Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Keigo Ushiyama, Satoshi Tanaka, Masahiro Miyakami, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2020. ViBaR: VR Platform Using Kinesthetic Illusions to Enhance Movement Experience. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2020 Emerging Technologies (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGGRAPH ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388534.3407304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Daniela Ghanbari Vahid, Lee Jones, Audrey Girouard, and Lois Frankel. 2021. Shape Changing Fabric Samples for Interactive Fashion Design. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, Salzburg Austria, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440633Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Jelle van Dijk and Caroline Hummels. 2017. Designing for Embodied Being-in-the-World: Two Cases, Seven Principles and One Framework. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Jelle van Dijk, Remko van der Lugt, and Caroline Hummels. 2014. Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540934Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Dirk van Erve, Gerrit-Willem Vos, Elise van den Hoven, and David Frohlich. 2011. Cueing the past: designing embodied interaction for everyday remembering. In Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design(DESIRE ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Gurvinder Singh Virk, Stephen Cameron, Ratna Sambhav, Moumita Paul, Roshan Kumar, Arvind Dixit, and Richa Pandey. 2020. Towards realising wearable exoskeletons for elderly people. In Proceedings of the Advances in Robotics 2019(AIR 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3352593.3352614Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Paweł W. Woźniak, Ashley Colley, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2018. Towards Increasing Bodily Awareness During Sports with Wearable Displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers(UbiComp ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 738–741. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267305.3267703Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Michele Xiloyannis, Ryan Alicea, Anna-Maria Georgarakis, Florian L. Haufe, Peter Wolf, Lorenzo Masia, and Robert Riener. 2022. Soft Robotic Suits: State of the Art, Core Technologies, and Open Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 38, 3 (June 2022), 1343–1362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2021.3084466 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Robotics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Momona Yamagami, Sasa Junuzovic, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, Edward Cutrell, John R. Porter, Andrew D. Wilson, and Martez E. Mott. 2022. Two-In-One: A Design Space for Mapping Unimanual Input into Bimanual Interactions in VR for Users with Limited Movement. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 15, 3, Article 23 (jul 2022), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510463Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Lining Yao, Ryuma Niiyama, Jifei Ou, Sean Follmer, Clark Della Silva, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. PneUI: pneumatically actuated soft composite materials for shape changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology(UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Xinlei Zhang, Ali Shtarbanov, Jiani Zeng, Valerie K. Chen, V. Michael Bove, Pattie Maes, and Jun Rekimoto. 2019. Bubble: Wearable Assistive Grasping Augmentation Based on Soft Inflatables. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312868Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. PneuMa: Designing Pneumatic Bodily Extensions for Supporting Movement in Everyday Life

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '24: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2024
      1058 pages
      ISBN:9798400704024
      DOI:10.1145/3623509

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)152
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)51

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format