skip to main content
10.1145/3623509.3635262acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Chitosan Biofilm Actuators: Humidity Responsive Materials for Sustainable Interaction Design

Published:11 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Shape-changing interfaces have been critiqued for not being sustainable despite their promising opportunities for tangible interaction. Incorporating nature inspired passive actuation mechanisms with embedded responsiveness can offer benefits for shape-changing interfaces. We introduce chitosan, a widely available biodegradable and humidity-responsive actuator that absorbs moisture from air and undergoes shape changes in response to fluctuations in humidity. Through explorative yet systematic material driven research through design, we uncover the utility and accessibility of chitosan as a reversible actuator to enable interactivity. We present the characterization of a variety of responsive structures made from chitosan films, combined with a variety of substrates. Outcomes from a generative session with designers/engineers from diverse backgrounds, provided insights into experiential properties and possible applications. We conclude with early prototypes that hold potential for wearables, haptics, self-assembly, and data-physicalization.

References

  1. Muhd Arif Aizat and Farhana Aziz. 2019. 12 - Chitosan Nanocomposite Application in Wastewater Treatments. In Eds. Amimul Ahsan and Ahmad Fauzi Ismail, Micro and Nano Technologies, Nanotechnology in Water and Wastewater Treatment, ISBN 9780128139028, Elsevier, 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813902-8.00012-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jason Alexander, Anne Roudaut, Jürgen Steimle, Kasper Hornbæk, Miguel Bruns Alonso, Sean Follmer, and Timothy Merritt. 2018. Grand Challenges in Shape-Changing Interface Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 299, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Silvia Bautista-Baños, Ana Hernández-Lauzardo, Miguel G. Velázquez-Del Valle, Hernández-López, M., Essaïd Ait Barka, Elsa Bosquez-Molina, and Carrie L. Wilson. 2006. Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities. Crop Protection. 25, 2 (2006), 108–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.03.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fiona Bell, Derrek Chow, Hyelin Choi, and Mirela Alistar. 2023. SCOBY BREASTPLATE: SLOWLY GROWING A MICROBIAL INTERFACE. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 34, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569009.3572805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Elzelinde van Doleweerd, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, and Miguel Bruns. 2022. Incorporating Shape-Changing Food Materials Into Everyday Culinary Practices: Guidelines Informed by Participatory Sessions with Chefs Involving Edible pH-responsive Origami Structures. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501315Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Javier G. Fernandez and Donald E. Ingber. 2012. Unexpected strength and toughness in chitosan-fibroin laminates inspired by insect cuticle. Advanced Materials. 24, 4 (2012), 480–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Karmen Franinović and Luke Franzke. 2019. Shape Changing Surfaces and Structures: Design Tools and Methods for Electroactive Polymers. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 125, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eduard Georges Groutars, Carmen Clarice Risseeuw, Colin Ingham, Raditijo Hamidjaja, Willemijn S. Elkhuizen, Sylvia C. Pont, and Elvin Karana. 2022. Flavorium: An Exploration of Flavobacteria's Living Aesthetics for Living Color Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 99, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sachin Sean Gupta, Dhileep Kumar Jayashankar, Naesh D. Sanandiya, Javier G. Fernandez, and Kenneth Tracy. 2019. Prototyping of chitosan-based shape-changing structures. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), vol. 2, pp. 441-450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Florian Hartmann, Melanie Baumgartner, and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2021. Becoming Sustainable, The New Frontier in Soft Robotics. Advanced Materials. 33, 19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Harshika Jain, Kexin Lu, and Lining Yao. 2021. Hydrogel-based DIY Underwater Morphing Artifacts: A morphing and fabrication technique to democratize the creation of controllable morphing 3D underwater structures with low-cost, easily available hydrogel beads adhered to a substrate. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1242–1252. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Viirj Kan, Emma Vargo, Noa Machover, Hiroshi Ishii, Serena Pan, Weixuan Chen, and Yasuaki Kakehi. 2017. Organic Primitives: Synthesis and Design of pH-Reactive Materials using Molecular I/O for Sensing, Actuation, and Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025952Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Elvin Karana, Bahar Barati, Valentina Rognoli, and Anouk Zeeuw van der Laan. 2015. Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences. International Journal of Design, 9(2), 35-54. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1965Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redstrom, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Danli Luo, Jianzhe Gu, Fang Qin, Guanyun Wang, and Lining Yao. 2020. E-seed: Shape-Changing Interfaces that Self Drill. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415855Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sachith Muthukumarana, Moritz Alexander Messerschmidt, Denys J.C. Matthies, Jürgen Steimle, Philipp M. Scholl, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2021. ClothTiles: A Prototyping Platform to Fabricate Customized Actuators on Clothing using 3D Printing and Shape-Memory Alloys. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 510, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445613Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pat Pataranutaporn, Todd Ingalls, and Ed Finn. 2018. Biological HCI: Towards Integrative Interfaces Between People, Computer, and Biological Materials. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper LBW579, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dinesh K. Patel, Ke Zhong, Haiqing Xu, Mohammad F. Islam, and Lining Yao. 2023. Sustainable Morphing Matter: Design and Engineering Practices. Advanced Materials Technologies published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202300678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jie Qi and Leah Buechley. 2012. Animating paper using shape memory alloys. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 749–752. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207783Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael L. Rivera, Jack Forman, Scott E. Hudson, and Lining Yao. 2020. Hydrogel-Textile Composites: Actuators for Shape-Changing Interfaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sumana Roy, Tamalika Chakraborty, Jeenatara Begum, Md Saquib Hasnain, and Amit Kumar Nayak. 2022. 1 - Chitosan: a versatile biopolymer. In Eds: Md Saquib Hasnain, Sarwar Beg, and Amit Kumar Nayak. Chitosan in Biomedical Applications, ISBN 9780128210581, Academic Press, 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821058-1.00005-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Chinmayee Saikia, Pankaj Gogoi and Tarun K Maji. 2015. Chitosan: A Promising Biopolymer in Drug Delivery Applications. Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine. s4. https://doi.org/10.4172/1747-0862.s4-006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Giulia Scalet. 2020. Two-way and multiple-way shape memory polymers for soft robotics: An overview. Actuators. 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/act9010010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wen Wang, Lining Yao, Teng Zhang, Chin-Yi Cheng, Daniel Levine, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2017. Transformative Appetite: Shape-Changing Food Transforms from 2D to 3D by Water Interaction through Cooking. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6123–6132. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Amy Winters, Iris Bekkers, Dorsa Nayeb Ghanbar Hosseini, Verindi Vekemans, Samuël Weima, and Miguel Bruns. 2022. Dynamic Robotic Fibers: Liquid Crystal Elastomers for Programmable and Reversible Shape-Changing Behaviors. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 353, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lining Yao, Jifei Ou, Chin-Yi Cheng, Helene Steiner, Wen Wang, Guanyun Wang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. BioLogic: Natto Cells as Nanoactuators for Shape Changing Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702611Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sang Ho Yoon, Siyuan Ma, Woo Suk Lee, Shantanu Thakurdesai, Di Sun, Flávio P. Ribeiro, and James D. Holbery. 2019. HapSense: A Soft Haptic I/O Device with Uninterrupted Dual Functionalities of Force Sensing and Vibrotactile Actuation. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347888Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. By Chang-E Zhou, Chi-wai Kan, Chang Sun, Jinmei Du, and Changhai Xu. 2019. A review of chitosan textile applications. AATCC Journal of Research. 6, (1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.14504/ajr.6.S1.2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Chitosan Biofilm Actuators: Humidity Responsive Materials for Sustainable Interaction Design
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '24: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2024
      1058 pages
      ISBN:9798400704024
      DOI:10.1145/3623509

      Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2024

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)169
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format