skip to main content
10.1145/3624875.3624880acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmisncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Chain Restaurant Financial and Operational Competitiveness Evaluation with Linguistic MULTIMOORA and Entropy Method

Published:16 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The volume of restaurant in Taiwan is increasing every year. So, chain restaurant faces a high pressure to compete with their competitor. The goal of this work is to build a novel framework to evaluate competitiveness of chain restaurant in Taiwan. In the case study, eight criteria have been arranged to evaluate competitiveness of five chain restaurants. In the final section, the advantage of framework has been discussed and the improvement direction of proposed framework has been taken over as ending.

References

  1. Heung, V. C., Wong, M. Y., & Hailin, Q. (2000). Airport-restaurant service quality in Hong Kong: An application of SERVQUAL. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 866-96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sulek, J. M., & Hensley, R. L. (2004). The relative importance of food, atmosphere, and fairness of wait: The case of a full-service restaurant. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 45(3), 235-247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xue, D., Zhao, Q., & Guo, X. (2008). TOPSIS method for evaluation customer service satisfaction to fast food industry. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 1, 920-925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Li, Q. S., Zhong, Y,, Chen, X., & Che, C. W. (2010). The Image of Characteristic Business District, Research on Restaurant Service Quality and Relationship Quality-Taking Hakka Restaurant in the Characteristic Business District of Hsinchu Beipu as an Example. Research on Sports and Leisure Dining, 5(2), 1-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai, Z., Chen, X., & Zhong, Y. G. (2011). An empirical study on the relationship between service quality, repurchase intention and word of mouth in teppanyaki restaurants. Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(3), 39-56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee, T. J., Cho, H., & Ahn, T. H. (2012). Senior citizen satisfaction with restaurant service quality. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 21(2), 215-226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gharakhani, D., Maghferati, A. P., & Jalalifar, S. (2012). Evaluation of the efficiency of Restaurants using DEA Method (the case of Iran). Life Science Journal, 9(4), 530-534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yildiz, S., & Yildiz, E. (2015). Service quality evaluation of restaurants using the AHP and TOPSIS method. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 53-61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pai, F. Y., Yeh, T. M., & Tang, C. Y. (2016). Classifying restaurant service quality attributes by using Kano model and IPA approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang, M. H., Su, C. H., & Wang, W. C. (2017). The Use of a DANP with VIKOR Approach for Establishing the Model of E-Learning Service Quality. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(8), 5927-5937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., & Chen, D. L. (2019). Research on Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty of Digital Sky Landscape Restaurant Using IPA Model. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Management, 7, 85-102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anggraeni, G., Lin, C. N., & Azizah, S. (2019). Using AHP to evaluate the critical factors on management of Indonesian restaurant. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 29(2), 167-177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ocampo, L., Tanaid, R. A., Tiu, A. M., Selerio Jr, E., & Yamagishi, K. (2021). Classifying the degree of exposure of customers to COVID-19 in the restaurant industry: A novel intuitionistic fuzzy set extension of the TOPSIS-Sort. Applied Soft Computing, 113, 107906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Abu Hassan, S., Hassan, N. A., Kin, T. Y., Mahat, N., & Ariffin, A. F. (2021). Companies’ perspectives on factors affecting consumer satisfaction in fast-food restaurant using fuzzy AHP. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation (JCRINN), 6(3), 42-52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chen, C. T., & Hung, W. Z. (2021). A MCDM method with linguistic variables and intuitionistic fuzzy numbers to evaluate product development projects. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 14(1), 935-945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pourshahabi, S., Talebbeydokhti, N., Rakhshandehroo, G., & Nikoo, M. R. (2018). Spatio-temporal multi-criteria optimization of reservoir water quality monitoring network using value of information and transinformation entropy. Water Resources Management, 32(10), 3489-3504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Chen, C. T., Huang, S. F., & Hung, W. Z. (2018). Linguistic VIKOR method for project evaluation of ambient intelligence product. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., Liao, H., & Herrera, F. (2019). An overview of MULTIMOORA for multi-criteria decision-making: Theory, developments, applications, and challenges. Information Fusion, 51, 145-177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lansdowne, Z. F., & Woodward, B. S. (1996). Applying the Borda ranking method. Air Force Journal of Logistics, 20(2), 27-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Chain Restaurant Financial and Operational Competitiveness Evaluation with Linguistic MULTIMOORA and Entropy Method
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MISNC '23: Proceedings of the 10th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference
          September 2023
          241 pages
          ISBN:9798400708176
          DOI:10.1145/3624875

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 October 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format