skip to main content
10.1145/3624875.3624888acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmisncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Psychological Safety, Participant-Intention, and Organizational Routine Affect Failure–Learning Implementation

Published:16 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although there is no distinctive header, this is the abstract. This submission template allows authors to submit their papers for review to an ACM Conference or Journal without any output design specifications incorporated at this point in the process. The ACM manuscript template is a single column document that allows authors to type their content into the pre-existing set of paragraph formatting styles applied to the sample placeholder text here. Throughout the document you will find further instructions on how to format your text. If your conference's review process will be double-blind: The submitted document should not include author information and should not include acknowledgments, citations or discussion of related work that would make the authorship apparent. Submissions containing author identifying information may be subject to rejection without review. Upon acceptance, the author and affiliation information must be added to your paper.

References

  1. James G. March, 1991. “Explorations and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science, 2,1, 71-87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sanetake Nagayoshi, and Jun Nakamura, 2021. “Can a computer-based knowledge repository strengthen organizational memory? Evidence from a Japanese Company.” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Yoichiro Hatamura, 2005. Shippaigaku No Susume (in Japanese), Tokyo: Kodansha Bunko.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paul Louis Iske, 2020. Institute of Brilliant Failures: Make Room to Experiment, Innovate and Learn. Business Contact.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Amy C. Edmondson, 2019. The Fearless Organization, Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Leaning, Innovation, and Growth, New York, Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. George P. Huber, 1991. “Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures.” Organization Science 2, 1, 88-115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Manlio Del Giudice, and Vincenzo Maggioni, 2014. “Managerial Practices and Operative Directions of Knowledge Management within Inter-Firm Networks: A Global View.” Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 5, 841-846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hsin Hsin Chang, and Shuang-Shii Chuang, 2011. “Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge sharing: Participant Involvement as a Moderator.” Information and Management, 48,1, 9-18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Wei-Tsong Wang, and Ya-Pei Hou, 2015. “Motivations of Employees' Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: A Self-Determination Perspective.” Information and Organization, 25, 1, 1-26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hao-Fan Chumg, Louise Cooke, Jenny Fry, and I-Hua Hung, 2015. “Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing in a Virtual Organisation: Employees' Sense of Well-Being as a Mediating Effect.” Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 70-80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hsui-Fen Lin, 2007. “Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Employee Knowledge Sharing Intentions.” Journal of Information Science, 33, 2, 135-149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mark D. Cannon, and Amy C. Edmondson, 2005. “Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve.” Long Range Plan 38, 299-319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mark D. Cannon, and Amy C. Edmondson, 2001. “Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs about Failure in Organizational Work Groups.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 167-177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Michael D. Cohen, 1991. “Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections.” Organization Science 2, 1, 135-139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michael D. Cohen, and Paul Bacdayan, 1994. “Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study.” Organization Science 5, 4, 554-568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Herbert A. Simon, 1991. “Bounded rationality and organizational learning.” Organization Science 2, 1,125-134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Scott D. N. Cook, and Dvora Yanow, 1993. “Culture and Organizational Learning.” Journal of Management Inquiry 2, 4,373-390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nobuo Takahashi,1998. “Organizational routine and interorganizational ecology.” Annals Organization Science 32, 2,54-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How Psychological Safety, Participant-Intention, and Organizational Routine Affect Failure–Learning Implementation
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MISNC '23: Proceedings of the 10th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference
            September 2023
            241 pages
            ISBN:9798400708176
            DOI:10.1145/3624875

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 16 October 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format