skip to main content
10.1145/3625008.3625009acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Pilot Study of the User Experience in an Augmented Reality Mobile App to Support Teaching of Hematology

Published: 06 January 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the development and pilot study of the user experience of the AnemiaAR Mobile App, an Augmented Reality serious game to support teaching of hematology. We created two versions of the game: marker-based (using Vuforia resources) and markerless (using MRTK resources). Our counterbalanced study considered assessing the two app versions by 12 volunteers, Medicine undergraduate students, enrolled in a hematology course. At the post-test, the subjects answered the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) and responded to an interview about the strengths and weaknesses of each version. The results showed 17 of the 26 UEQ aspects with better evaluation means for the markerless support, suggesting a more positive user experience for this version. This panorama is corroborated by the subjective interview data, showing a user preference for markerless interaction for this AR mobile game.

References

[1]
Murat Akçayır and Gökçe Akçayır. 2017. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational research review 20 (2017), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
[2]
AH Allam and Halina Mohamed Dahlan. 2013. User experience: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation 3, 1 (2013), 28–36.
[3]
Regina Bernhaupt. 2010. User Experience Evaluation in Entertainment. Springer London, London, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_1
[4]
Isabela Bianchi, Cassiano JM Stefani, Pablo Santiago, Alexandre L Zanatta, and Rafael Rieder. 2022. AnemiaAR: a serious game to support teaching of haematology. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 45, 3 (2022), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2021.2021798
[5]
Pedro Quelhas Brito and Jasmina Stoyanova. 2018. Marker versus markerless augmented reality. Which has more impact on users?International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 9 (2018), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1393974
[6]
Julie Carmigniani, Borko Furht, Marco Anisetti, Paolo Ceravolo, Ernesto Damiani, and Misa Ivkovic. 2011. Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia tools and applications 51 (2011), 341–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
[7]
Jack CP Cheng, Keyu Chen, and Weiwei Chen. 2017. Comparison of marker-based AR and markerless AR: A case study on indoor decoration system. In Lean and Computing in Construction Congress (LC3): Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3). ITC Digital library, Heraklion, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.24928/JC3-2017/0231
[8]
Anabela Estudante and Nicolas Dietrich. 2020. Using augmented reality to stimulate students and diffuse escape game activities to larger audiences. Journal of Chemical Education 97, 5 (2020), 1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00933
[9]
Chen Feng and Vineet R Kamat. 2012. Augmented reality markers as spatial indices for indoor mobile AECFM applications. In Proceedings of 12th international conference on construction applications of virtual reality (CONVR 2012). CONVR, Taipei, 235–24. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4484.4166
[10]
Panos E Kourouthanassis, Costas Boletsis, and George Lekakos. 2015. Demystifying the design of mobile augmented reality applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 74 (2015), 1045–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1710-7
[11]
MRTK. 2023. Documentação para desenvolvedores do MRTK2-Unity. https://learn.microsoft.com/pt-br/windows/mixed-reality/mrtk-unity/mrtk2
[12]
MRTK. 2023. Projeto Github: Mixed Reality Toolkit – Unity. https://github.com/microsoft/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity
[13]
Danakorn Nincarean, Mohamad Bilal Alia, Noor Dayana Abdul Halim, and Mohd Hishamuddin Abdul Rahman. 2013. Mobile augmented reality: The potential for education. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 103 (2013), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.385
[14]
Alexandra Rese, Daniel Baier, Andreas Geyer-Schulz, and Stefanie Schreiber. 2017. How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 124 (2017), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.010
[15]
Martin Schrepp, Jörg Thomaschewski, and Andreas Hinderks. 2017. Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4 (2017), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445
[16]
UEQ. 2023. User Experience Questionnaire. https://www.ueq-online.org
[17]
UNITY. 2023. Unity: Real–time development platform | 3D, 2D, VR & AR engine. https://unity.com
[18]
VUFORIA. 2023. Vuforia Developer Portal. https://developer.vuforia.com
[19]
VUFORIA. 2023. Vuforia Enterprise Augmented Reality (AR) Software | PTC. https://www.ptc.com/pt/products/vuforia
[20]
Hsin-Kai Wu, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Hsin-Yi Chang, and Jyh-Chong Liang. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & education 62 (2013), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SVR '23: Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality
November 2023
315 pages
ISBN:9798400709432
DOI:10.1145/3625008
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 January 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. augmented reality
  2. hematology
  3. marked-based
  4. markerless
  5. mobile game
  6. user experience

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SVR '23
SVR '23: Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality
November 6 - 9, 2023
Rio Grande, Brazil

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 71
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)57
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media