Audrey Laplante
ABSTRACT
Music research appears to lag behind other fields in adopting methods coming from the digital humanities (DH). Researchers have hypothesized that this might be due to the gulf that exists between music scholars who use computational approaches and those who do not, which makes it more difficult for the former group to publish their research and gain recognition for their research from their peers. If we are to invest efforts and resources in the development of tools for music analysis, it seems crucial to understand what could impede their adoption. In this paper, we present the preliminary results of an ongoing qualitative study based on five in-depth interviews with music scholars from Canadian universities. We focus more specifically on 1) how music scholars perceive and value digital musicology, and 2) how they think doing digital musicology could affect the career progression of a scholar. We found that the participants who did not do DH research expressed skepticism towards the validity and relevance of DH research in music, valued traditional approaches, and, to some extent, feared that DH methods could displace traditional methods. Participants from both sides of the gulf noted that doing DH research in music could sometimes constitute an advantage in the career progression of music scholars (e.g., for getting funding), but that it could also be detrimental in other circumstances (e.g., for getting published in renowned journals).
- Christine L. Borgman. 2007. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7434.001.0001Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Pierre Bourdieu. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14, 6 (Dec. 1975), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raymond Erickson. 1968. Music analysis and the computer. Journal of Music Theory 12, 2 (1968), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/843312Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15, 9 (2005), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charles Inskip and Frans Wiering. 2015. In their own words: Using text analysis to identify musicologists’ attitudes towards technology. In Proceedings of the 16th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Malaga, Spain.Malaga, Spain. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1416422Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan Liu. 2013. The meaning of the digital humanities. PMLA 128, 2 (2013), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.409Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan Marsden. 2009. ‘What was the question?’: Music analysis and the computer. In Modern Methods for Musicology. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Collectif Multitudes. 2015. Digital humanities manifesto 2.0. Multitudes 59, 2 (2015), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.059.0181Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Panteli, Emmanouil Benetos, and Simon Dixon. 2018. A review of manual and computational approaches for the study of world music corpora. Journal of New Music Research 47, 2 (2018), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2017.1418896Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Quinn Patton. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Susan Schreibman, Raymond George Siemens, and John Unsworth. 2004. A companion to digital humanities. Blackwell Pub., Malden, MA. https://companions.digitalhumanities.org/DH/Google Scholar
- Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anja Volk and Aline Honingh. 2012. Mathematical and computational approaches to music: Challenges in an interdisciplinary enterprise. Journal of Mathematics and Music 6, 2 (2012), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2012.704154Google ScholarCross Ref
- Volk, Anja, Wiering, Frans, and van Kranenburg, Peter. 2011. Unfolding the potential of computational musicology. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations: Problems and Possibilities of Computational Humanities. Fryske Akademy, 137–144.Google Scholar
- Claire Warwick. 2012. Studying users in digital humanities. In Digital Humanities in Practice, Claire Warwick, Julianne Nyhan, and Melissa Terras (Eds.). Facet, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049054.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zorich, Diane M.2012. Transitioning to a digital world: Art history, its research centers, and digital scholarship. Technical Report. https://www.kressfoundation.org/Resources/Sponsored-Research/Research-Items/Transitioning-to-a-Digital-WorldGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Attitudes of Music Scholars Towards Digital Musicology
Recommendations
Listen Here! A Web-native digital musicology environment for machine-assisted close listening
DLfM '23: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Libraries for MusicologyClose listening is a mainstay of the musicological study of performance recordings, but paying focused, critical attention carries high cognitive overhead, making the application of this approach difficult when dealing with large corpora. In Signature ...
Applications of RISM data in digital libraries and digital musicology
Information about manuscripts and printed music indexed in RISM (Répertoire International des Sources Musicales), a large, international project that records and describes musical sources, was for decades available solely through book publications, CD-...
The Digital Music Lab: A Big Data Infrastructure for Digital Musicology
Special Issue on Digital Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage, Part 1In musicology and music research generally, the increasing availability of digital music, storage capacities, and computing power enable and require new and intelligent systems. In the transition from traditional to digital musicology, many techniques ...
Comments