skip to main content
10.1145/3625687.3625787acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

CurtainNet: Enabling precise beamforming with a deformable antenna array on a fabric substrate

Published:26 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent trends in flexible antennas and printed circuit boards present an opportunity to leverage deformable substrates such as textiles to deploy large UHF, VHF and ISM band antenna arrays in smart homes. Low-frequency large antenna arrays are rarely deployed in indoor settings due to their large size which makes them bulky and difficult to deploy. By embedding these arrays on existing surfaces such as curtains, we can improve through-wall sensing, beamforming for IoT devices equipped with low-power radios and indoor localization of Bluetooth tags.

However, antenna arrays on curtains present new challenges since deformation shifts their phase centers and changes the 3D positions of antennas. We present CurtainNet, a flexible UHFband antenna array on a large surface curtain that leverages a combination of optical and RF tracking to compensate for these changes while dealing with occlusions and phase changes. Results show that CurtainNet outperforms alternative methods by more than 155% in beamforming performance and increases indoor range by 20m.

References

  1. Blender. https://www.blender.org/. [Online; accessed 13-Feb-2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A steerable, transflective metamaterial surface for NextG mmWave networks. In 20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 23), Boston, MA, Apr. 2023. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. V. Arun and H. Balakrishnan. RFocus: Beamforming using thousands of passive antennas. In 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20), pages 1047--1061, Santa Clara, CA, Feb. 2020. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Bencivenni, M. Coldrey, R. Maaskant, and M. V. Ivashina. Aperiodic switched array for line-of-sight mimo backhauling. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 17(9):1712--1716, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Bian, B. Zhou, H. Bello, and P. Lukowicz. A wearable magnetic field based proximity sensing system for monitoring covid-19 social distancing. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC '20, page 22--26, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Borges, A. Symington, B. Coltin, T. Smith, and R. Ventura. Htc vive: Analysis and accuracy improvement. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 2610--2615, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. L. Buechley, D. Mellis, H. Perner-Wilson, E. Lovell, and B. Kaufmann. Living wall: programmable wallpaper for interactive spaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 1401--1402, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Chen, W. Hu, K. Jamieson, X. Chen, D. Fang, and J. Gummeson. Pushing the physical limits of iot devices with programmable metasurfaces. In NSDI, pages 425--438, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. X. Chen, D. Ganesan, J. Gummeson, and M. Rostami. Cocoon: A conductive substrate-based coupled oscillator network for wireless communication. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys '21, page 84--96, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Cheng, C. Xing, and Y.-C. Wu. Irregular array manifold aided channel estimation in massive mimo communications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 13(5):974--988, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K. Chetty, G. E. Smith, and K. Woodbridge. Through-the-wall sensing of personnel using passive bistatic wifi radar at standoff distances. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(4):1218--1226, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K. W. Cho, Y. Ghasempour, and K. Jamieson. Towards dual-band reconfigurable metasurfaces for satellite networking. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets '22, page 17--23, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. W. Dong, Z.-H. Xu, X.-H. Liu, L.-S.-B. Wang, and S.-P. Xiao. Modular subarrayed phased-array design by means of iterative convex relaxation optimization. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 18(3):447--451, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. esar. Vivepos. https://github.com/esar/vivepos, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. a. N. I. C. Ettus Research. Octoclock. https://www.ettus.com/all-products/octoclock/, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. a. N. I. C. Ettus Research. X300 kit. https://www.ettus.com/all-products/x300-kit/, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Y. Feng, Y. Xie, D. Ganesan, and J. Xiong. Lte-based pervasive sensing across indoor and outdoor. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys '21, page 138--151, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Feng, Y. Xie, D. Ganesan, and J. Xiong. Lte-based low-cost and low-power soil moisture sensing. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys '22, page 421--434, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Ferraro and G. De Natale. On the possible use of optical fiber bragg gratings as strain sensors for geodynamical monitoring. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 37(2--3):115--130, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. W. Giernacki, M. Skwierczyński, W. Witwicki, P. Wroński, and P. Kozierski. Crazyflie 2.0 quadrotor as a platform for research and education in robotics and control engineering. In 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pages 37--42, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Hosseinzadeh. Multi wall (cost231) signal propagation models + python code. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/61340-multi-wall-cost231-signal-propagation-models-python-code, 2023. Accessed February 15, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Hosseinzadeh, H. Larijani, and K. Curtis. An enhanced modified multi wall propagation model. 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), pages 1--4, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. A. Ibrahim, G. Hassan, K. Monea, H. S. Hassanein, and K. Obaia. A ferrous-selective proximity sensor for industrial internet of things. In ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 1--6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. Kanchi, S. Sandilya, D. Bhosale, A. Pitkar, and M. Gondhalekar. Overview of lte-a technology. In 2013 IEEE Global High Tech Congress on Electronics, pages 195--200, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. F. Kendoul, I. Fantoni, and K. Nonami. Optic flow-based vision system for autonomous 3d localization and control of small aerial vehicles. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57(6--7):591--602, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D.-W. Kim and S. Nam. Mutual coupling compensation in receive-mode antenna array based on characteristic mode analysis. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 66(12):7434--7438, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Kotaru, K. Joshi, D. Bharadia, and S. Katti. Spotfi: Decimeter level localization using wifi. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM '15, page 269--282, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. G. Lan, M. F. Imani, P. d. Hougne, W. Hu, D. R. Smith, and M. Gorlatova. Wireless sensing using dynamic metasurface antennas: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(6):66--71, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. G. Lan, M. F. Imani, Z. Liu, J. Manjarrés, W. Hu, A. S. Lan, D. R. Smith, and M. Gorlatova. Metasense: Boosting rf sensing accuracy using dynamic metasurface antenna. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(18):14110--14126, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. S. M. LaValle, A. Yershova, M. Katsev, and M. Antonov. Head tracking for the oculus rift. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 187--194, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Z. Li, Y. Xie, L. Shangguan, R. I. Zelaya, J. Gummeson, W. Hu, and K. Jamieson. Towards programming the radio environment with large arrays of inexpensive antennas. In NSDI, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Z.-q. Luo, W.-k. Ma, A. M.-c. So, Y. Ye, and S. Zhang. Semidefinite relaxation of quadratic optimization problems. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 27(3):20--34, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. R. Ma and W. Hu. Cross-media wireless made easier: Tuning media interfaces with flexible metasurfaces, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. R. Ma, W. Hu, and R. I. Zelaya. Softly, deftly, scrolls unfurl their splendor: Rolling flexible surfaces for wideband wireless. MobiCom '23. Association for Computing Machinery, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. MathWorks. Music super-resolution doa estimation. https://www.mathworks.com/help/phased/ug/music-super-resolution-doa-estimation.html, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. K. Morsi, X. Huagang, and G. Qiang. Performance estimation and evaluation of bluetooth frequency hopping selection kernel. In 2009 Joint Conferences on Pervasive Computing (JCPC), pages 461--466, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. U. Noreen, A. Bounceur, and L. Clavier. A study of lora low power and wide area network technology. In 2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP), pages 1--6, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. U. on Stack Overflow. Find the pair of closest points from two sets of points. https://stackoverflow.com/a/9632444, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J. Purat, N. J. Lehmann, M. Karagulle, and A. Voisard. Halownet - a wifi halow network-based information system for the provision of multi-sided applications for medical emergency scenarios. In 2022 IEEE 10th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), pages 519--521, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, jun 2022. IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. L. Qiao, Z. Zheng, W. Cui, and L. Wang. A survey on wi-fi halow technology for internet of things. In 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pages 1--5, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. H. Qu, T. Brastaviceanu, F. Bergeron, J. Olesik, I. Pavlov, T. Ishigure, and M. Skorobogatiy. Photonic bandgap bragg fiber sensors for bending/displacement detection. Appl. Opt., 52(25):6344--6349, Sep 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Qualisys. Human biomechanics and sports research. https://www.qualisys.com/life-sciences/human-biomechanics-and-sports-research/, accessed 2023-02-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. D. Quiñones, G. Lopes, D. Kim, C. Honnet, D. Moratal, and A. Kampff. HIVE Tracker: a tiny, low-cost, and scalable device for sub-millimetric 3D positioning. In Augmented Human International Conference, Seoul, South Korea, Feb. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. C. M. Ramya, M. Shanmugaraj, and R. Prabakaran. Study on zigbee technology. In 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, volume 6, pages 297--301, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. T. R. Rao and D. Balachander. Rf propagation investigations at 915/2400 mhz in indoor corridor environments for wireless sensor communications. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 47:359--381, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. A. A. N. Shirehjini, A. Yassine, and S. Shirmohammadi. An rfid-based position and orientation measurement system for mobile objects in intelligent environments. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 61(6):1664--1675, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. H. Singh, S. H L, and R. Jha. Mutual coupling in phased arrays: A review. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 2013, 01 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. D. Vasisht, S. Kumar, and D. Katabi. Decimeter-level localization with a single wifi access point. In 13th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 16), pages 165--178, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. J. Wang, F. Adib, R. Knepper, D. Katabi, and D. Rus. Rf-compass: Robot object manipulation using rfids. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing Networking, MobiCom '13, page 3--14, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. J. Wang and Y. Takahashi. Indoor mobile robot self-localization based on a low-cost light system with a novel emitter arrangement. Robomech J, 5:17, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. R. Want. An introduction to rfid technology. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 5(1):25--33, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. A. Welkie, L. Shangguan, J. Gummeson, W. Hu, and K. Jamieson. Programmable radio environments for smart spaces. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets-XVI, page 36--42, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. D. Willi, M. Meindl, H. Xu, and M. Rothacher. Gnss antenna phase center variation calibration for attitude determination on short baselines. Navigation: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 65(4):643--654, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. X. Xiao, Y. Fan, J. Dufek, and R. Murphy. Indoor uav localization using a tether. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), pages 1--6, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. B. Xie, D. Ganesan, and J. Xiong. Embracing lora sensing with device mobility. In 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), pages 349--361. ACM, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. B. Xie and J. Xiong. Combating interference for long range lora sensing. In 18th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), pages 69--81. ACM, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. R. I. Zelaya, R. Ma, and W. Hu. Towards 6g and beyond: Smarten everything with metamorphic surfaces. In Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets '21, page 155--162, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. R. I. Zelaya, R. Ma, and W. Hu. Towards 6g and beyond: Smarten everything with metamorphic surfaces. In Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets '21, page 155--162, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. R. I. Zelaya, W. Sussman, J. Gummeson, K. Jamieson, and W. Hu. Lava: Finegrained 3d indoor wireless coverage for small iot devices. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference, SIGCOMM '21, page 123--136, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Y. Zhang, C. Yang, S. E. Hudson, C. Harrison, and A. Sample. Wall++ room-scale interactive and context-aware sensing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1--15, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. CurtainNet: Enabling precise beamforming with a deformable antenna array on a fabric substrate

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SenSys '23: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
            November 2023
            574 pages
            ISBN:9798400704147
            DOI:10.1145/3625687

            Copyright © 2023 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 April 2024

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader