skip to main content
10.1145/3625704.3625710acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Study on the Impact of Using 6E Model combined with the Self-efficacy Strategies for An AIoT Hands-on Activity to Students'STEM Career Interest, Learning Effectiveness and Behavior Pattern

Published:04 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the arrival of the era of Industry 4.0, the development of technologies such as Internet of Things and others has gradually been implemented in daily life. The Artificial Internet of Things can be used for STEM teaching. Its integrates the comprehensive knowledge and application of technology in the fields of science, machinery, mathematics, information and artificial intelligence.The middle school stage is a critical period for young people to develop STEM career interests, especially for the high school students. Not only they should experience an important exploratory process of choosing a department at the university but also they need to cultivate their career interest and career decision-making abilities for career preparation. However, there are few opportunities for students to actively explore their interests and integrate practical skills and hence most high school students have a huge cognitive gap between their interests in future career and their background knowledge. Therefore, this research uses the 6E model combined with the self-efficacy strategies in order to enable students to participate more actively in class discussions and complete their practical works with the help of their peers, thereby accumulating a sense of accomplishment and gaining better learning performance. According to the results, we can find that there are significant differences in STEM career interest, IoT knowledge and hands-on ability. Besides, it also shows that students in the 6E model combined with the self-efficacy strategies group can have good STEM career interest and learning effectiveness, which can help them in the development of related STEM careers in the future.

References

  1. Barton, E. E., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Effects of reinforcement on peer imitation in a small group play context. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(1), 69-86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Beatson, N. J., Berg, D. A., & Smith, J. K. (2018). The impact of mastery feedback on undergraduate students’ self-efficacy beliefs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 58-66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chan, H. C. Y. & Chan, L. (2018). Smart library and smart campus. Journal of Service Science and Management, 11(4), 543-564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Compeau, S. (2016). The calling of an engineer: High school students' perceptions of engineering (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/13924Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorph, R., Bathgate, M. E., Schunn, C. D., & Cannady, M. A. (2018). When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 1034-1057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Falco, L. D., Summers, J. J., Bauman, S. (2010). Encouraging mathematics participation through improved self-efficacy: A school counseling outcomes study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(4), 529-549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Feki, M. A., Kawsar, F., Boussard, M., & Trappeniers, L. (2013). The internet of things: the next technological revolution. Computer, 46(2), 24-25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fidai, A., Kwon, H., Buettner, G., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Jarvis, C., & Verma, S. (2019, October). Internet of things (IoT) instructional devices in STEM classrooms: Past, present and future directions. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gan, Z., Hu, G., Wang, W., Nang, H., & An, Z. (2021). Feedback behaviour and preference in university academic English courses: associations with English language self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 740-755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Guntha, R., Hariharan, B., & Rangan, P. V. (2016). Analysis of echo cancellation techniques in multi-perspective smart classroom. In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI)(pp. 1135-1140).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gushue, G. V., Clarke, C. P., Pantzer, K. M., Scanlan, K. R. (2006). Self-efficacy, perceptions of barriers, vocational identity, and the career exploration behavior of Latinoa high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(9), 307-317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S. and Palaniswami, M. (2013) Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29, 1645-1660.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hundhausen C. D., Agrawal A., Agarwal P. (2013). Talking about code: integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ,13, 1-28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jiang, Y. (2021). Learning Goal Orientation, Career Self‐Efficacy, and Career Interest: A Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Employment Counseling, 58(4), 167-181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lee, V., Cohen, S. R., Edgar, L., Laizner, A. M., & Gagnon, A. J. (2006). Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Social Science & Medicine, 62(12), 3133-3145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Nusyirwan, Prayetno, Sumantri & Perwira (2020). Engineering Design Process of Arduino Uno-based Smart Classroom Technology. The Journal of Innovation and Technology, 1(2), 72-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Renbarger, R., & DAVİS, B. (2019). Mentors, self-efficacy, or professional development: Which mediate job satisfaction for new teachers༟ A regression examination. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 8(1), 21-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Saini, M. K., & Goel, N. (2019). How smart are smart classrooms? A review of smart classroom technologies. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), 1-28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zhang, L, & Barnett, M. (2015). How high school students envision their STEM career pathways. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 637-656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zorn, T. E., Roper, J., Broadfoot, K., & Kay Weaver, C. (2006). Focus groups as sites of influential interaction: Building communicative self-efficacy and effecting attitudinal change in discussing controversial topics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(2), 115-140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Study on the Impact of Using 6E Model combined with the Self-efficacy Strategies for An AIoT Hands-on Activity to Students'STEM Career Interest, Learning Effectiveness and Behavior Pattern

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEMT '23: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
      August 2023
      429 pages
      ISBN:9798400709142
      DOI:10.1145/3625704

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format