skip to main content
research-article

Understanding the Effects of Movement Direction on 2D Touch Pointing Tasks

Published:01 November 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

HCI researchers have long recognized the significant effects of movement direction on human performance, and this factor has been carefully addressed to benefit user interface design. According to our previous study (2012), the weights of the two target dimensions, width W and height H, in the extended index of difficulty (ID) for 2D pointing tasks are asymmetric and appear to vary periodically based on movement direction (θ), following a cosine function. However, this periodic effect of movement direction is uncertain for direct 2D touch pointing tasks, and a thorough understanding of the effects of movement direction on direct pointing tasks, such as on touch input surfaces, is still lacking. In this paper, we conducted two experiments on a 24-inch touch screen, with tilted and horizontal orientations respectively, to confirm the periodic effect in the context of direct pointing and illustrate its variations across different pointing tasks. At the same time, we propose a quantification formula to measure the real differences in task difficulty caused by the direction factor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to do so. Using this formula, the ID values in different directions can be unified to the same scale and compared, providing a new perspective for understanding and evaluating human performance in different interaction environments.

References

  1. Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 2003. Refining Fitts’ Law Models for Bivariate Pointing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’03). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 193–200. isbn:1581136307 https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642646 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Caroline Appert, Olivier Chapuis, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2008. Evaluation of Pointing Performance on Screen Edges. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 119–126. isbn:9781605581415 https://doi.org/10.1145/1385569.1385590 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Oscar Kin-Chung Au, Xiaojun Su, and Rynson W.H. Lau. 2014. LinearDragger: A Linear Selector for One-Finger Target Acquisition. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 2607–2616. isbn:9781450324731 https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557096 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Daniel Avrahami. 2015. The Effect of Edge Targets on Touch Performance. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1837–1846. isbn:9781450331456 https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702439 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Myroslav Bachynskyi, Gregorio Palmas, Antti Oulasvirta, Jürgen Steimle, and Tino Weinkauf. 2015. Performance and Ergonomics of Touch Surfaces: A Comparative Study Using Biomechanical Simulation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1817–1826. isbn:9781450331456 https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702607 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hrvoje Benko, Andrew D. Wilson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2006. Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-Touch Screens. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1263–1272. isbn:1595933727 https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124963 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xiaojun Bi, Yang Li, and Shumin Zhai. 2013. FFitts Law: Modeling Finger Touch with Fitts’ Law. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1363–1372. isbn:9781450318990 https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466180 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. James Boritz, Kellogg S. Booth, and Wiliam B. Cowan. 1991. Fitts’ Law Studies of Directional Mouse Movement. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto. 216–223. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stuart K. Card, William K. English, and Betty J. Burr. 1987. Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys, for Text Selection on a CRT. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. 386–392. isbn:0934613249 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/58076.58107 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Karen B. Chen, Anne B. Savage, Amrish O. Chourasia, Douglas A. Wiegmann, and Mary E. Sesto. 2013. Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 2 (2013), 297–302. issn:0003-6870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Cockburn, D. Ahlström, and C. Gutwin. 2012. Understanding Performance in Touch Selections: Tap, Drag and Radial Pointing Drag with Finger, Stylus and Mouse. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 3 (2012), 218–233. issn:1071-5819 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.11.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alan Esenther and Kathy Ryall. 2006. Fluid DTMouse: Better Mouse Support for Touch-Based Interactions. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 112–115. isbn:1595933530 https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133289 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Leah Findlater, Jon E. Froehlich, Kays Fattal, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Tanya Dastyar. 2013. Age-Related Differences in Performance with Touchscreens Compared to Traditional Mouse Input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 343–346. isbn:9781450318990 https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470703 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paul M Fitts. 1954. The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 6 (1954), 381–391. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0055392 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Chia Shen, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Direct-Touch vs. Mouse Input for Tabletop Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 647–656. isbn:9781595935939 https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240726 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tovi Grossman and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2005. A Probabilistic Approach to Modeling Two-Dimensional Pointing. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12, 3 (2005), sep, 435–459. issn:1073-0516 https://doi.org/10.1145/1096737.1096741 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yves Guiard. 2009. The Problem of Consistency in the Design of Fitts’ Law Experiments: Consider Either Target Distance and Width or Movement Form and Scale. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1809–1818. isbn:9781605582467 https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518980 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Niels Henze, Enrico Rukzio, and Susanne Boll. 2011. 100,000,000 Taps: Analysis and Improvement of Touch Performance in the Large. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 133–142. isbn:9781450305419 https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037395 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2011. Understanding Touch. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 2501–2510. isbn:9781450302289 https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979308 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yu-Jung Ko, Hang Zhao, Yoonsang Kim, IV Ramakrishnan, Shumin Zhai, and Xiaojun Bi. 2020. Modeling Two Dimensional Touch Pointing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 858–868. isbn:9781450375146 https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415871 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. I. Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 7, 1 (1992), mar, 91–139. issn:0737-0024 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. I. Scott MacKenzie and William Buxton. 1992. Extending Fitts’ Law to Two-Dimensional Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’92). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 219–226. isbn:0897915135 https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142794 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mark Micire, Martin Schedlbauer, and Holly A. Yanco. 2007. Horizontal selection: An Evaluation of a Digital Tabletop Input Device. In Proceedings of 2007 Americas Conference on Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library, Keystone, Colorado. 164. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2007/164 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilian Genaro Motti, Nadine Vigouroux, and Philippe Gorce. 2013. Interaction Techniques for Older Adults Using Touchscreen Devices: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 125–134. isbn:9781450324076 https://doi.org/10.1145/2534903.2534920 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christian Müller-Tomfelde, Anja Wessels, and Claudia Schremmer. 2008. Tilted tabletops: In between Horizontal and Vertical Workspaces. In 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems. IEEE, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2008.4660183 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Atsuo Murata and Hirokazu Iwase. 2001. Extending Fitts’ Law to a Three-Dimensional Pointing Task. Human Movement Science, 20, 6 (2001), 791–805. issn:0167-9457 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00058-6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Atsuo Murata and Hirokazu Iwase. 2005. Usability of Touch-Panel Interfaces for Older Adults. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47 (2005), 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570952 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Alex Olwal, Steven Feiner, and Susanna Heyman. 2008. Rubbing and Tapping for Precise and Rapid Selection on Touch-Screen Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 295–304. isbn:9781605580111 https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357105 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Esben Warming Pedersen and Kasper Hornbæ k. 2012. An Experimental Comparison of Touch Interaction on Vertical and Horizontal Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 370–379. isbn:9781450314824 https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399074 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. R. L. Potter, L. J. Weldon, and B. Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’88). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 27–32. isbn:0201142376 https://doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Gabriel Cramariuc, and Doina Maria Schipor. 2015. Touch Interaction for Children Aged 3 to 6 Years. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 74, C (2015), feb, 54–76. issn:1071-5819 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sebastian Vetter, Jennifer Bützler, Nicole Jochems, and Christopher M. Schlick. 2011. Fitts’ Law in Bivariate Pointing on Large Touch Screens: Age-Differentiated Analysis of Motion Angle Effects on Movement Times and Error Rates. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Users Diversity, Constantine Stephanidis (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 620–628. isbn:978-3-642-21663-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21663-3_67 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 657–666. isbn:9781595935939 https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240727 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Thomas G. Whisenand and Henry H. Emurian. 1999. Analysis of Cursor Movements with a Mouse. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 1 (1999), 85–103. issn:0747-5632 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00036-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Huahai Yang and Xianggang Xu. 2010. Bias towards Regular Configuration in 2D Pointing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1391–1400. isbn:9781605589299 https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753536 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Xing-Dong Yang, Tovi Grossman, Pourang Irani, and George Fitzmaurice. 2011. TouchCuts and TouchZoom: Enhanced Target Selection for Touch Displays Using Finger Proximity Sensing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 2585–2594. isbn:9781450302289 https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979319 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Koji Yatani, Kurt Partridge, Marshall Bern, and Mark W. Newman. 2008. Escape: A Target Selection Technique Using Visually-Cued Gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA. 285–294. isbn:9781605580111 https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357104 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Xinyong Zhang, Hongbin Zha, and Wenxin Feng. 2012. Extending Fitts’ Law to Account for the Effects of Movement Direction on 2D Pointing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 3185–3194. isbn:9781450310154 https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208737 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding the Effects of Movement Direction on 2D Touch Pointing Tasks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue ISS
          December 2023
          482 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3554314
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 November 2023
          Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue ISS

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)80
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader