Implementation of Summary-Connection-Prediction (SCP) Instructional Strategy in Flipped Classroom with Moodle: Investigate Preservice Teachers' Acceptance and Beliefs
Pages 393 - 400
Abstract
This study investigated the implementation of summary-connection-prediction (SCP) instructional strategy on students’ report tasks before the class under the flipped classroom learning design with Moodle. A total of 106 undergraduate students who enrolled in the Teaching and Learning Theory course participated in this study. A questionnaire based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and open-ended interview questions were used to collect the data. Following the results, it is known that the preservice teachers have high positive acceptance of SCP strategy. Further, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness significantly predict behavioral intention, which follows the relationship direction in TAM. Regarding the thematic analysis of interview data, three themes are elaborated to obtain in-depth information about what preservice teachers’ beliefs when implementing this strategy.
References
[1]
Ajayi, I.H., Iahad, N.A., Ahmad, N. and Yusof, A.F. 2017. A proposed conceptual model for flipped learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 95, 24 (2017), 7049–7057.
[2]
Al-Adwan, A.S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G.A., Albelbisi, N.A. and Habibi, A. 2023. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”.” Education and Information Technologies. (Apr. 2023).
[3]
Al-Adwan, A.S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G.A., Albelbisi, N.A. and Habibi, A. 2023. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”. Education and Information Technologies. (Apr. 2023).
[4]
Albadran, N.F. 2020. Flipped Classroom Model Based Technology Acceptance and Adoption among Faculty Members in Saudi Arabia Universities. Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing. May 2020 (2020), 25–57.
[5]
Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A. and Alzahrani, A.I. 2020. A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development. 68, 3 (Jun. 2020), 1017–1051.
[6]
Alyoussef, I.Y. 2022. Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon. 8, 12 (Dec. 2022), e12529.
[7]
Alyoussef, I.Y. 2022. Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon. 8, 12 (Dec. 2022), e12529.
[8]
Amad, Z., Tamani, S., Sefri, Y. and Radid, M. 2023. The Flipped Classroom Approach via the M-Learning Model: Impact on Student Learning and Motivation. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences. 50, 4 (2023).
[9]
De Backer, L., Van Keer, H. and Valcke, M. 2015. Exploring evolutions in reciprocal peer tutoring groups’ socially shared metacognitive regulation and identifying its metacognitive correlates. Learning and Instruction. 38, (Aug. 2015), 63–78.
[10]
Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ISTE.
[11]
Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ISTE.
[12]
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A.D. and Antonenko, P. 2019. Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 67, 4 (Aug. 2019), 793–824.
[13]
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A.D. and Antonenko, P. 2019. Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 67, 4 (Aug. 2019), 793–824.
[14]
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3 (Sep. 1989), 319.
[15]
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3 (Sep. 1989), 319.
[16]
Doo, M.Y. 2023. An investigation of the social influence processes of flipped class students: An application of the extension of the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies. 0123456789 (May 2023).
[17]
Huang, A.Y.Q., Lu, O.H.T. and Yang, S.J.H. 2023. Effects of artificial Intelligence–Enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education. 194, November 2022 (Mar. 2023), 104684.
[18]
Hwang, W.-Y. and Hariyanti, U. 2020. Investigation of Students’ and Parents’ Perceptions of Authentic Contextual Learning at Home and Their Mutual Influence on Technological and Pedagogical Aspects of Learning under COVID-19. Sustainability. 12, 23 (Dec. 2020), 10074.
[19]
Kemp, A., Palmer, E. and Strelan, P. 2019. A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50, 5 (Sep. 2019), 2394–2413.
[20]
Kemp, A., Palmer, E., Strelan, P. and Thompson, H. 2022. Exploring the specification of educational compatibility of virtual reality within a technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 38, 2 (2022), 15–34.
[21]
Khlaisang, J., Teo, T. and Huang, F. 2021. Acceptance of a flipped smart application for learning: a study among Thai university students. Interactive Learning Environments. 29, 5 (Jul. 2021), 772–789.
[22]
Mafarja, N., Mohamad, M.M., Zulnaidi, H. and Fadzil, H.M. 2023. Using of reciprocal teaching to enhance academic achievement: A systematic literature review. Heliyon. 9, 7 (Jul. 2023), e18269.
[23]
Mafarja, N. and Zulnaidi, H. 2022. Relationship between Critical thinking and academic self- concept: An experimental study of Reciprocal teaching strategy. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 45, (2022), 101113.
[24]
Nadlifatin, R., Miraja, B.A., Persada, S.F., Belgiawan, P.F., Redi, A.A.N.P. and Lin, S.-C. 2020. The Measurement of University Students’ Intention to Use Blended Learning System through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) at Developed and Developing Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 15, 09 (May 2020), 219.
[25]
O'Dwyer, L.M. and Bernauer, J.A. 2013. Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. SAGE.
[26]
Palinscar, A.S. and Brown, A.L. 1984. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1, 2 (Mar. 1984), 117–175.
[27]
Retnaningsih, W., Nugroho, A., Van, D.T.H. and Al Amin, N.H. 2022. Booming the Vocabulary Acquisition by Using Flipped Classroom on EFL Learners’ PPA (Performance, Perception and Acceptance). VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society. 6, 2 (Oct. 2022), 325–339.
[28]
Said, C.S., Jelani, A.B., Abd Rashid, N., Kamarulzaman, M.A., Abdul Rahman, M.H., Ismail, N., Mohd Noor, A.F. and Amin, J.M. 2022. Exploring University Students’ Acceptance in Online Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11, 4 (Nov. 2022), 88–97.
[29]
Said, C.S., Jelani, A.B., Abd Rashid, N., Kamarulzaman, M.A., Abdul Rahman, M.H., Ismail, N., Mohd Noor, A.F. and Amin, J.M. 2022. Exploring University Students’ Acceptance in Online Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11, 4 (Nov. 2022), 88–97.
[30]
Sánchez, R.A. and Hueros, A.D. 2010. Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1632–1640.
[31]
Schünemann, N., Spörer, N. and Brunstein, J.C. 2013. Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching: A moderator–mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders’ reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 38, 4 (Oct. 2013), 289–305.
[32]
Seymour, J.R. and Osana, H.P. 2003. Reciprocal Teaching procedures and principles: two teachers’ developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education. 19, 3 (Apr. 2003), 325–344.
[33]
Sholikah, M. and Sutirman, S. 2020. How Technology Acceptance Model TAM)Factors of Electronic Learning Influence Education Service Quality through Students’ Satisfaction. TEM Journal. 9, 3 (Aug. 2020), 1221–1226.
[34]
Sholikah, M. and Sutirman, S. 2020. How Technology Acceptance Model TAM)Factors of Electronic Learning Influence Education Service Quality through Students’ Satisfaction. TEM Journal. 9, 3 (Aug. 2020), 1221–1226.
[35]
Strayer, J.F. 2016. Designing Instruction for Flipped Classroom. Instructional Design Theories and Models, Volume IV. C.M. Reigeluth, B.J. Beatty, and R.D. Myers, eds. Routledge. 30.
[36]
Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S. and Wong, S.L. 2009. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education. 53, 3 (Nov. 2009), 1000–1009.
[37]
Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S. and Wong, S.L. 2009. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education. 53, 3 (Nov. 2009), 1000–1009.
[38]
Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, acceptance model. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 11, 3 (2000), 319–340.
[39]
Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Journal of Decision Sciences Institute. 39, 2 (2008), 273–315.
[40]
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model. Management Science. 46, 2 (2000), 186–204.
Index Terms
- Implementation of Summary-Connection-Prediction (SCP) Instructional Strategy in Flipped Classroom with Moodle: Investigate Preservice Teachers' Acceptance and Beliefs
Recommendations
Flipped Classroom: Do Malaysian Polytechnic Lecturers Ready for Adoption?
ICIET 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education TechnologyA common challenge of among lecturers is to design and develop learning materials before class for implementing flipped classroom that is caused by lack of training and facilities. The purpose of this study is to determine how high and low-level ...
The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom
AbstractWith the integration of popular technologies such as social media, smartphones, and tablets in the education system, new online course delivery methods such as flipped classrooms have emerged to enhance teaching and learning. To understand ...
Exploring secondary school teachers’ TPACK for video-based flipped learning: the role of pedagogical beliefs
AbstractVideo-based flipped learning (VFL) has become a popular form of flipped learning. However, teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for video-based flipped learning is still under-explored. A TPACK-VFL questionnaire for ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2023
722 pages
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 27 December 2023
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
SIET 2023
SIET 2023: International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology
October 24 - 25, 2023
Badung, Bali, Indonesia
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 45 of 57 submissions, 79%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 24Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)20
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format