skip to main content
10.1145/3626641.3626940acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessietConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Implementation of Summary-Connection-Prediction (SCP) Instructional Strategy in Flipped Classroom with Moodle: Investigate Preservice Teachers' Acceptance and Beliefs

Published:27 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the implementation of summary-connection-prediction (SCP) instructional strategy on students’ report tasks before the class under the flipped classroom learning design with Moodle. A total of 106 undergraduate students who enrolled in the Teaching and Learning Theory course participated in this study. A questionnaire based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and open-ended interview questions were used to collect the data. Following the results, it is known that the preservice teachers have high positive acceptance of SCP strategy. Further, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness significantly predict behavioral intention, which follows the relationship direction in TAM. Regarding the thematic analysis of interview data, three themes are elaborated to obtain in-depth information about what preservice teachers’ beliefs when implementing this strategy.

References

  1. Ajayi, I.H., Iahad, N.A., Ahmad, N. and Yusof, A.F. 2017. A proposed conceptual model for flipped learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 95, 24 (2017), 7049–7057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Adwan, A.S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G.A., Albelbisi, N.A. and Habibi, A. 2023. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”.” Education and Information Technologies. (Apr. 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Al-Adwan, A.S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G.A., Albelbisi, N.A. and Habibi, A. 2023. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”. Education and Information Technologies. (Apr. 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Albadran, N.F. 2020. Flipped Classroom Model Based Technology Acceptance and Adoption among Faculty Members in Saudi Arabia Universities. Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing. May 2020 (2020), 25–57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A. and Alzahrani, A.I. 2020. A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development. 68, 3 (Jun. 2020), 1017–1051. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09718-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Alyoussef, I.Y. 2022. Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon. 8, 12 (Dec. 2022), e12529. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Alyoussef, I.Y. 2022. Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon. 8, 12 (Dec. 2022), e12529. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Amad, Z., Tamani, S., Sefri, Y. and Radid, M. 2023. The Flipped Classroom Approach via the M-Learning Model: Impact on Student Learning and Motivation. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences. 50, 4 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.4.18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H. and Valcke, M. 2015. Exploring evolutions in reciprocal peer tutoring groups’ socially shared metacognitive regulation and identifying its metacognitive correlates. Learning and Instruction. 38, (Aug. 2015), 63–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2015.04.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ISTE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ISTE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A.D. and Antonenko, P. 2019. Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 67, 4 (Aug. 2019), 793–824. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A.D. and Antonenko, P. 2019. Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development. 67, 4 (Aug. 2019), 793–824. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3 (Sep. 1989), 319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3 (Sep. 1989), 319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Doo, M.Y. 2023. An investigation of the social influence processes of flipped class students: An application of the extension of the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies. 0123456789 (May 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11878-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Huang, A.Y.Q., Lu, O.H.T. and Yang, S.J.H. 2023. Effects of artificial Intelligence–Enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education. 194, November 2022 (Mar. 2023), 104684. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hwang, W.-Y. and Hariyanti, U. 2020. Investigation of Students’ and Parents’ Perceptions of Authentic Contextual Learning at Home and Their Mutual Influence on Technological and Pedagogical Aspects of Learning under COVID-19. Sustainability. 12, 23 (Dec. 2020), 10074. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310074.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kemp, A., Palmer, E. and Strelan, P. 2019. A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50, 5 (Sep. 2019), 2394–2413. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kemp, A., Palmer, E., Strelan, P. and Thompson, H. 2022. Exploring the specification of educational compatibility of virtual reality within a technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 38, 2 (2022), 15–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Khlaisang, J., Teo, T. and Huang, F. 2021. Acceptance of a flipped smart application for learning: a study among Thai university students. Interactive Learning Environments. 29, 5 (Jul. 2021), 772–789. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mafarja, N., Mohamad, M.M., Zulnaidi, H. and Fadzil, H.M. 2023. Using of reciprocal teaching to enhance academic achievement: A systematic literature review. Heliyon. 9, 7 (Jul. 2023), e18269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E18269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mafarja, N. and Zulnaidi, H. 2022. Relationship between Critical thinking and academic self- concept: An experimental study of Reciprocal teaching strategy. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 45, (2022), 101113. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Nadlifatin, R., Miraja, B.A., Persada, S.F., Belgiawan, P.F., Redi, A.A.N.P. and Lin, S.-C. 2020. The Measurement of University Students’ Intention to Use Blended Learning System through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) at Developed and Developing Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 15, 09 (May 2020), 219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i09.11517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. O'Dwyer, L.M. and Bernauer, J.A. 2013. Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Palinscar, A.S. and Brown, A.L. 1984. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1, 2 (Mar. 1984), 117–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Retnaningsih, W., Nugroho, A., Van, D.T.H. and Al Amin, N.H. 2022. Booming the Vocabulary Acquisition by Using Flipped Classroom on EFL Learners’ PPA (Performance, Perception and Acceptance). VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society. 6, 2 (Oct. 2022), 325–339. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.6107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Said, C.S., Jelani, A.B., Abd Rashid, N., Kamarulzaman, M.A., Abdul Rahman, M.H., Ismail, N., Mohd Noor, A.F. and Amin, J.M. 2022. Exploring University Students’ Acceptance in Online Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11, 4 (Nov. 2022), 88–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i4/15066.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Said, C.S., Jelani, A.B., Abd Rashid, N., Kamarulzaman, M.A., Abdul Rahman, M.H., Ismail, N., Mohd Noor, A.F. and Amin, J.M. 2022. Exploring University Students’ Acceptance in Online Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11, 4 (Nov. 2022), 88–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i4/15066.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sánchez, R.A. and Hueros, A.D. 2010. Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1632–1640. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schünemann, N., Spörer, N. and Brunstein, J.C. 2013. Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching: A moderator–mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders’ reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 38, 4 (Oct. 2013), 289–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2013.06.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Seymour, J.R. and Osana, H.P. 2003. Reciprocal Teaching procedures and principles: two teachers’ developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education. 19, 3 (Apr. 2003), 325–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00018-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sholikah, M. and Sutirman, S. 2020. How Technology Acceptance Model TAM)Factors of Electronic Learning Influence Education Service Quality through Students’ Satisfaction. TEM Journal. 9, 3 (Aug. 2020), 1221–1226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sholikah, M. and Sutirman, S. 2020. How Technology Acceptance Model TAM)Factors of Electronic Learning Influence Education Service Quality through Students’ Satisfaction. TEM Journal. 9, 3 (Aug. 2020), 1221–1226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Strayer, J.F. 2016. Designing Instruction for Flipped Classroom. Instructional Design Theories and Models, Volume IV. C.M. Reigeluth, B.J. Beatty, and R.D. Myers, eds. Routledge. 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S. and Wong, S.L. 2009. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education. 53, 3 (Nov. 2009), 1000–1009. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S. and Wong, S.L. 2009. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education. 53, 3 (Nov. 2009), 1000–1009. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control , intrinsic motivation , acceptance model. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 11, 3 (2000), 319–340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Journal of Decision Sciences Institute. 39, 2 (2008), 273–315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model. Management Science. 46, 2 (2000), 186–204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Implementation of Summary-Connection-Prediction (SCP) Instructional Strategy in Flipped Classroom with Moodle: Investigate Preservice Teachers' Acceptance and Beliefs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIET '23: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology
      October 2023
      722 pages
      ISBN:9798400708503
      DOI:10.1145/3626641

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate45of57submissions,79%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format