Cited By
View all- Tache (Ungureanu) MPăscuțoiu OBorcoci E(2024)Optimization Algorithms in SDN: Routing, Load Balancing, and Delay OptimizationApplied Sciences10.3390/app1414596714:14(5967)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
Comparative Analysis of Load Balancing with Shortest Delay and Least Connection Methods on Software Defined Network
Pages 589 - 598
Abstract
Software-Defined Network (SDN) is an essential component of network management, and load balancing is necessary to ensure proper network functionality. This research compares the performance of two load-balancing algorithms, Shortest Delay and Least Connection, which have not been previously compared. The research uses Mininet and RYU simulators as controllers and Flask as a web server. HTTPERF tools are used to test the algorithms with three parameters: CPU Usage, Throughput, and Response Time. The tests are conducted with 600, 900, and 1,500 connections for 150 seconds. The results show that the Shortest Delay algorithm has lower CPU Usage for all connection tests and lower Response Time for low and medium connection tests. However, the Least Connection algorithm is superior for high connection tests due to its lower Response Time. This research provides valuable insights into the performance of these two load-balancing algorithms on SDN.
References
[1]
P. Göransson, C. Black, and T. Culver, Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Approach: Second Edition. 2016.
[2]
D. Kreutz, F. M. V. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig, “Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, 2015.
[3]
M. Abdillah, W. Yahya, and A. Basuki, “Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Metode Load Balancing Berbasis CPU Dengan Berbasis Response Time Pada Software Defined Network” JPTIIK J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 395–403, 2018,
[4]
J. Zha, J. Wang, R. Han, and M. Song, “RESEARCH ON LOAD BALANCE OF SERVICE CAPABILITY INTERACTION MANAGEMENT,” Appl. Mech. Mater., 2010.
[5]
Z. Shang, W. Chen, Q. Ma, and B. Wu, “Design and implementation of server cluster dynamic load balancing based on OpenFlow,” 2013 Int. Jt. Conf. Aware. Sci. Technol. Ubi-Media Comput.
[6]
A. Mahmood and I. Rashid, “Comparison of load balancing algorithms for clustered web servers,” 2011 Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Multimedia. “Ubiquitous ICT Sustain. Green Living”, ICIM 2011, no. November 2011.
[7]
H. Zhong, Y. Fang, and J. Cui, “Reprint of ‘LBBSRT: An efficient SDN load balancing scheme based on server response time,’” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 80, pp. 409–416, 2018,
[8]
L. Ronny, C. Negara, W. Yahya, and R. Primananda, “Analisis Dan Implementasi Load Balancing Pada Web Server Dengan Algoritme Shortest Delay Pada Software Defined Network,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput. Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 2791–2797, 2018.
[9]
M. W. Putra, E. S. Pramukantoro, and W. Yahya, “Analisis Perbandingan Performansi Kontroller Floodlight, Maestro, RYU, POX Dan ONOS Dalam Arsitektur Software Defined Network ( SDN ),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 3779–3787, 2018.
[10]
L. Fani, I. Ardy, A. Bhawiyuga, and W. Yahya, “Implementasi Load Balancer Berdasarkan Server Status pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network ( SDN ),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 2135–2143, 2018.
[11]
K. A. Agung Nugroho, Widhi Yahya, “Analisis Perbandingan Performa Algoritma Round Robin dan Least Connection untuk Load Balancing pada Software Defined Network,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 1568–1577, 2017.
[12]
I. Ummah, “Perancangan Simulasi Jaringan Virtual Berbasis Software-Define Networking,” Indones. J. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2016.
[13]
F. Alfareza, A. Basuki, and K. Amron, “Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Stateless Dan Stateful Pada Aplikasi Server Load Balancing Berbasis Software-Defined Networking,” vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 8954–8963, 2019.
[14]
H. Karim, R. Primananda, and W. Yahya, “Implementasi Load Balancing Web Server Dengan Algoritme Weighted Least Connection Pada Software Defined Network,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
[15]
M. Sholeh, W. Yahya, and P. H. Trisnawan, “Implementasi Load Balancing menggunakan Algoritme Least Connection dengan Agen Psutils pada Web Server,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 842–851, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
[16]
P. Monika, R. M. Negara, and D. D. Sanjoyo, “Performance analysis of software defined network using intent monitor and reroute method on ONOS controller,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2065–2073, 2020.
[17]
E. Amiri, E. Alizadeh, and M. H. Rezvani, “Controller selection in software defined networks using best-worst multi-criteria decision-making,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1506–1517, 2020.
[18]
A. Widjajarto, D. W. Jacob, and M. Lubis, “Live migration using checkpoint and restore in userspace (Criu): Usage analysis of network, memory and CPU,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 837–847, 2021.
[19]
N. Fauzi, W. Yahya, and A. Bhawiyuga, “Implementasi Load Balancing Pada Server Dengan Menggunakan Algoritme Least Traffic Pada Software-Defined Network,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput. Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 3134–3141, 2018
[20]
M. Rizky Pratama, “Analisis Performansi Load Balancing Dengan Algoritma Round Robin Dan Least Connection Pada Sebuah Web Server,” Proceeding Appl. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 1577, 2015.
[21]
F. Mulya, T. W. P, S. Si, M. Pmat, and R. Latuconsina, “Analisis Load Balancing Pada Jaringan Software Defined Network ( Sdn ) Menggunakan Algoritma Optimasi Koloni Semut Load Balancing Analysis on Software Defined Network ( Sdn ) Using Ant-Colony Optimization Algorithm,” e-Proceeding Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1385–1392, 2019
[22]
V. Monita, I. D. Irawati, and R. Tulloh, “Comparison of routing protocol performance on multimedia services on software defined network,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1612–1619, 2020.
[23]
P. E. Numan, “On the latency and jitter evaluation of software defined networks,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1507–1516, 2019.
[24]
T. Bonald and M. Feuillet, “Network Performance Analysis,” Netw. Perform. Anal., 2011.
[25]
G. Singh and K. Kaur, “An Improved Weighted Least Connection Scheduling Algorithm for Load Balancing in Web Cluster Systems,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, pp. 1950–1955, 2018
Index Terms
- Comparative Analysis of Load Balancing with Shortest Delay and Least Connection Methods on Software Defined Network
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Impact of DoS Attack in Software Defined Network for Virtual Network
A virtual network is a computer network which does not contain any physical link between two computational nodes instead they connect through the virtual links. In recent years the virtual network is managed by Software Defined Network (SDN). SDN is one ...
Network parameters effects on system resources in software defined networks
ICICT '19: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication TechnologySoftware Defined Networking (SDN), often referred to as a revolutionary rather than an evolutionary new idea in networking, promises to dramatically simplify network control, management, and enable innovation through network programmability. SDN has ...
SDN-DVFS: an enhanced QoS-aware load-balancing method in software defined networks
AbstractRecently, software defined networks (SDN) has been considered as a promising technology for improving the network performance. However, the load imbalance problem considerably reduces quality of service (QoS) level in SDNs. Traffic distribution in ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2023
722 pages
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 27 December 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
SIET 2023
SIET 2023: International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology
October 24 - 25, 2023
Badung, Bali, Indonesia
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 45 of 57 submissions, 79%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 31Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)24
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Tache (Ungureanu) MPăscuțoiu OBorcoci E(2024)Optimization Algorithms in SDN: Routing, Load Balancing, and Delay OptimizationApplied Sciences10.3390/app1414596714:14(5967)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format