ABSTRACT
This study examines the effectiveness of two distinct methods for learning Chinese characters: one that incorporates a hierarchical approach with writing and visual mnemonics, and another that utilizes a hierarchical approach combined with writing. Utilizing a crossover trial design, the research investigates the impact of these strategies on memory retention and learner satisfaction among 30 participants with little or no prior experience in Chinese studies. The evaluation parameters included the accuracy of written strokes, the completion of entirely correct characters, and participants' perceptions of each learning method. The outcomes revealed a significant improvement in memory retention and learning ease when the learning method incorporated visual mnemonics. This finding suggests a novel pedagogical strategy in Chinese character learning, offering a promising alternative for educators in the Chinese language.
- M. Ahmadi, A. A. Zarei, and R. Esfandiari. 2020. Learning L2 Idioms through Visual Mnemonics. Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz 12, 26 (2020), 1-27.Google Scholar
- P. Armitage and M. Hills. 1982. The two‐period crossover trial. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 31, 2 (1982), 119-131.Google Scholar
- R. C. Atkinson. 1975. Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American psychologist 30, 8 (1975), 821.Google Scholar
- A. Campos, M. A. González, and A. Amor. 2003. Limitations of the mnemonic-keyword method. The Journal of general psychology 130, 4 (2003), 399-413.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Y. Chang, Y. Y. Tang, C. Y. Lee, and H. C. Chen. 2022. The Effect of Visual Mnemonics and the Presentation of Character Pairs on Learning Visually Similar Characters for Chinese-As-Second-Language Learners. Frontiers in psychology 13, (2022), 783898-783898.Google Scholar
- Q. L. Guo, F. P. Chew, and Y. Y. Yeoh. 2022. Effects of the Instruction With Liushu on Mandarin Learners’ Chinese Character Achievement and Motivation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 13, 6 (2022), 1211-1221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. W. Hall. 1988. On the utility of the keyword mnemonic for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 4 (1988), 554.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. W. Heisig and T. W. Richardson. 2008. Remembering traditional hanzi 1: How not to forget the meaning and writing of Chinese characters. University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
- M. L. Amy Kuo and S. Hooper. 2004. The effects of visual and verbal coding mnemonics on learning Chinese characters in computer-based instruction. Educational technology research and development 52, 3 (2004), 23-34.Google Scholar
- T. K. Kim. 2015. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean journal of anesthesiology 68, 6 (2015), 540-546.Google Scholar
- T. H. Ling, C. N. L. Chin, and N. Unin. 2019. Learning to write chinese characters among non-native chinese learners.Google Scholar
- O. Linge. 2020. Are mnemonics too slow for Chinese learners? Hacking Chinese. https://www.hackingchinese.com/are-mnemonics-too-slow-for-chinese-learners/Google Scholar
- J. C. Loach and J. Wang. 2016. Optimizing the learning order of Chinese characters using a novel topological sort algorithm. PloS one 11, 10 (2016), e0163623.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. E. McKnight and J. Najab. 2010. Mann‐Whitney U Test. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology 1, (2010), 1-1.Google Scholar
- M. Tao, D. Yang, and W. Liu. 2019. Learning effect and its prediction for cognitive tests used in studies on indoor environmental quality. Energy and Buildings 197, (2019), 87-98.Google Scholar
- N. M. Nel, S. Krog, and L. Lebeloane. 2019. South African Grade 5 non-native learners learning Mandarin as a second additional language with a focus on Chinese characters. Literator: Journal of Literary Criticism, Comparative Linguistics and Literary Studies 40, 1 (2019), 1-11.Google Scholar
- M. H. Tsai, L. Y. Chang, H. C. Chen, and C. L. Lin. 2021. Effects of key-image mnemonics on Chinese instruction for first-grade students’ achievement and interest toward Chinese learning. International Journal of Educational Research 109, (2021), 101856.Google Scholar
- A. Y. Wang and M. H. Thomas. 1992. The effect of imagery-based mnemonics on the long-term retention of Chinese characters. Language Learning 42, 3 (1992), 359-376.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Züll. 2016. Open-ended questions (version 2.0).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Applying Visual Mnemonics Enhances Chinese Characters Learning for Chinese as Second Language Learners: A Mixed-Method Study
Recommendations
A New Method for Segmenting Handwritten Chinese Characters
ICDAR '97: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Document Analysis and RecognitionA new approach is proposed to segment off-line handwritten Chinese character. Many papers have been published on the off-line recognition of Chinese characters, and almost all of them focus on the recognition of isolated Chinese character. The ...
Chinese-Japanese Machine Translation Exploiting Chinese Characters
The Chinese and Japanese languages share Chinese characters. Since the Chinese characters in Japanese originated from ancient China, many common Chinese characters exist between these two languages. Since Chinese characters contain significant semantic ...
Comments