skip to main content
10.1145/3627341.3630382acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccvitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Artificial intelligence based algorithm for automatic diagnosis and quantification of acute spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage

Published:15 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical analysis tool called uAI-HematomaCare in automatically detecting, classifying, and measuring the volume of acute spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on non-contrast-enhanced CT (NCCT) images.

Methods: A 1:2 matched case-control study design was used. The analysis included NCCT images from 70 cases with ICH and 140 non-ICH cases (70 cases with hemorrhage-like hyperdensities). Initially, the algorithm's performance in detecting and classifying acute ICH subtypes was compared to that of two radiologists. The criterion standard was determined by consensus of two blinded neuroradiology experts. Subsequently, the algorithm and two radiologists quantified the volumes of intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and total ICH using manual segmentation. The performance of the measurement methods was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and absolute error.

Results: The algorithm showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80% for detecting any ICH, while radiologist 1 showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99.29%, and radiologist 2 showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%. Regarding the classification of ICH subtypes, the algorithm showed a higher sensitivity in detecting IVH (100%) and SAH (100%), but lower specificity (97.71% and 95.19%, respectively) compared to the two radiologists. ICCs ranging from 0.932 to 0.983 indicated good agreement between the algorithm and manual segmentation methods for measuring summation and individual hemorrhage volumes (IPH, IVH, and SAH). Bland-Altman analysis of absolute errors revealed that the algorithm performed well in quantifying the volume of total ICH and the three subtypes, but radiologist 1 had better overall performance.

Conclusion: The AI-based algorithm analysis tool, uAI-HematomaCare, demonstrated a high accuracy in automatically detecting, classifying, and quantifying acute spontaneous ICH. However, further improvements are needed to enhance its ability to differentiate between hyperdensities and ICH.

References

  1. Roh D J, Asonye I S, Carvalho Poyraz F, Magid-Bernstein J R, Joiner E F, Avadhani R, Awad I. 2022. Intraventricular Hemorrhage Expansion in the Clear Iii Trial: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis. Stroke, 53, 6 (Jun 2022), 1847-1853. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.121.037438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, Jung C, Forsting M, Rinkel G. 2013. European Stroke Organization Guidelines for the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 35, 2 (Dec 2013), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Glover M t, Almeida R R, Schaefer P W, Lev M H, Mehan W A, Jr. 2017. Quantifying the Impact of Noninterpretive Tasks on Radiology Report Turn-around Times. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 14, 11 (Nov 2017), 1498-1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gibson E, Georgescu B, Ceccaldi P, Trigan P H, Yoo Y, Das J, Re T J. 2022. Artificial Intelligence with Statistical Confidence Scores for Detection of Acute or Subacute Hemorrhage on Noncontrast Ct Head Scans. Radiol Artif Intell, 4, 3 (May 2022), e210115. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.210115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhao X, Chen K, Wu G, Zhang G, Zhou X, Lv C, Wu S. 2021. Deep Learning Shows Good Reliability for Automatic Segmentation and Volume Measurement of Brain Hemorrhage, Intraventricular Extension, and Peripheral Edema. European radiology, 31, 7 (Jul 2021), 5012-5020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07558-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gou X, He X. 2021. Deep Learning-Based Detection and Diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021), 9639419. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9639419Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chang P D, Kuoy E, Grinband J, Weinberg B D, Thompson M, Homo R, Chen J. 2018. Hybrid 3d/2d Convolutional Neural Network for Hemorrhage Evaluation on Head Ct. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 39, 9 (Sep 2018), 1609-1616. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Schmitt N, Mokli Y, Weyland C S, Gerry S, Herweh C, Ringleb P A, Nagel S. 2022. Automated Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Hemorrhage Suspect Hyperdensities in Non-Contrast-Enhanced Ct Scans of Acute Stroke Patients. European radiology, 32, 4 (Apr 2022), 2246-2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08352-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Seu T. RSNA 2019 Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection: Code for 1st Place Solution in Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection Challenge. Retrieved May 27, 2023 from https://github.com/SeuTao/RSNA2019_1st_place_solution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee H, Yune S, Mansouri M, Kim M, Tajmir S H, Guerrier C E, Ebert S A. 2019. An Explainable Deep-Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Acute Intracranial Haemorrhage from Small Datasets. Nature biomedical engineering, 3, 3 (Mar 2019), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0324-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cho J, Park K S, Karki M, Lee E, Ko S, Kim J K, Lee D. 2019. Improving Sensitivity on Identification and Delineation of Intracranial Hemorrhage Lesion Using Cascaded Deep Learning Models. Journal of digital imaging, 32, 3 (Jun 2019), 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-00172-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ye H, Gao F, Yin Y, Guo D, Zhao P, Lu Y, Wang X. 2019. Precise Diagnosis of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Subtypes Using a Three-Dimensional Joint Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Network. European radiology, 29, 11 (Nov 2019), 6191-6201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06163-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dhar R, Falcone G J, Chen Y, Hamzehloo A, Kirsch E P, Noche R B, Roth K. 2020. Deep Learning for Automated Measurement of Hemorrhage and Perihematomal Edema in Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke, 51, 2 (Feb 2020), 648-651. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027657Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ironside N, Chen C J, Mutasa S, Sim J L, Marfatia S, Roh D, Ding D. 2019. Fully Automated Segmentation Algorithm for Hematoma Volumetric Analysis in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke, 50, 12 (Dec 2019), 3416-3423. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.119.026561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chung K J, Kuang H, Federico A, Choi H S, Kasickova L, Al Sultan A S, Horn M. 2021. Semi-Automatic Measurement of Intracranial Hemorrhage Growth on Non-Contrast Ct. International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 16, 2 (Feb 2021), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019895704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Artificial intelligence based algorithm for automatic diagnosis and quantification of acute spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICCVIT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computer, Vision and Intelligent Technology
            August 2023
            378 pages
            ISBN:9798400708701
            DOI:10.1145/3627341

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 15 December 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            ICCVIT '23 Paper Acceptance Rate54of142submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate54of142submissions,38%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format