ABSTRACT
Time-varying kinematics is a problem with extreme relevance in an increasingly automated world, with no more than a handful of papers studying it. For any industry nowadays to include automation within their pipeline, there will almost always be a need to have purpose-built robotics with expensive and elaborate infrastructure built around it. The reasoning for this is that any robotic-based automation implemented requires movement commands with pin-point precision to work reliably. The Kinematics of the robot is already a well-studied subject, however kinematics only ever reliably works on static object goals, not on moving object goals. This would pose a problem as any industry seeking to implement robotic automation would have no solution toward moving object goals. Additionally, traditional robotic automation incurs time-cost due to the necessity of static object goals during collection. Stopping the object goal or halting robot movement adds to the time overhead, impacting overall efficiency. To address these limitations, this research explores the integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) to develop a more robust "Reflected" trajectory prediction methodology. By leveraging IoT capabilities, it is possible to enhance the adaptability and responsiveness of robotic systems to dynamic grasping tasks involving moving object goals. The introduction of IoT design principles would also allow for a more robust range of robotics to be able to integrate the proposed system, as the computationally complex tasks might not be able to run well alone on a miniaturized robotic system.
- Jie Cai, Jinlian Deng, Wei Zhang, and Weisheng Zhao. 2021. Modeling Method of Autonomous Robot Manipulator Based on D-H Algorithm. Mobile Information Systems 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4448648Google ScholarCross Ref
- François Chaumette and Seth Hutchinson. 2007. Visual servo control. II. Advanced approaches [Tutorial]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 14, 1 (2007), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2007.339609Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sachin Chitta, Ioan Sucan, and Steve Cousins. 2012. MoveIt!IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 19, 1 (2012), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2011.2181749Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohamed El Beheiry and Maxime Dahan. 2013. ViSP: Representing single-particle localizations in three dimensions. Nature Methods 10, 8 (2013), 689–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2566Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kovalevsky, I.I. Mueller, and B. Kolaczek. 1989. Reference Frames: In Astronomy and Geophysics. Springer Netherlands. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=UQspAAAAYAAJGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- E Marchand. 1999. ViSP : A software environment for eye-in-hand visual servoing To cite this version : HAL Id : inria-00352546. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 4 (1999), 3224–3230.Google Scholar
- Éric Marchand, Fabien Spindler, and François Chaumette. 2005. ViSP for visual servoing: A generic software platform with a wide class of robot control skills. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 12, 4 (2005), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2005.1577023Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mircea Paul Muresan, Ion Giosan, and Sergiu Nedevschi. 2020. Stabilization and validation of 3D object position using multimodal sensor fusion and semantic segmentation. Sensors 20, 4 (2020), 1110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dinh C Nguyen, Ming Ding, Pubudu N Pathirana, Aruna Seneviratne, Jun Li, Dusit Niyato, Octavia Dobre, and H Vincent Poor. 2021. 6G Internet of Things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9, 1 (2021), 359–383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Relly Victoria V. Petrescu, Raffaella Aversa, Bilal Akash, Ronald B. Bucinell, Juan M. Corchado, Filippo Berto, MirMilad Mirsayar, Antonio Apicella, and Florian Ion T. Petrescu. 2017. Inverse Kinematics at the Anthropomorphic Robots, by a Trigonometric Method. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 10, 2 (2017), 394–411. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.394.411Google ScholarCross Ref
- Er Harpreet Singh, Naveen Dhillon, and Er Imran Ansari. 2015. Forward and inverse Kinematics Solution for Six DOF with the help of Robotics tool box in matlab. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering and Management (IJAIEM) 4, 3 (2015), 17–22.Google Scholar
- Lin Xiao and Yunong Zhang. 2014. Solving time-varying inverse kinematics problem of wheeled mobile manipulators using Zhang neural network with exponential convergence. Nonlinear Dynamics 76, 2 (2014), 1543–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1227-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yanpeng Zhou, Keping Liu, and Chunxu Li. 2021. A Gradient Neural Network for online Solving the Time-varying Inverse Kinematics Problem of Four-wheel Mobile Robotic Arm. (2021), 7.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- IoT-Driven Solution for Time-Varying Kinematics: 'Reflected'Trajectory Prediction in Dynamic Grasping Tasks
Recommendations
Human Driven Robot Grasping: An Interactive Framework
MESAS 2016: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems - Volume 9991One main problem in the field of robotic grasping is to teach a robot how to grasp a particular object; in fact, this depends not only on the object geometry, but also on the end-effector properties. Different methods to generate grasp trajectories way-...
Towards markerless visual servoing of grasping tasks for humanoid robots
2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)Vision-based grasping for humanoid robots is a challenging problem due to a multitude of factors. First, humanoid robots use an “eye-to-hand” kinematics configuration that, on the contrary to the more common “eye-in-hand” ...
Component-based robot system design for grasping tasks
The paper presents a robot system design with highly reusable components for a component-based robot system for manipulation tasks. The robot system is designed based on the analysis of manipulation tasks using a unified modeling language use case ...
Comments