skip to main content
10.1145/3627611.3627617acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ombra Musici II: Classical Music Performance and Public Space

Published:28 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ombra Musici II presents a video projection of a violinist performing solo classical works on a screen installed on a rooftop terrace adjacent a major street and public plaza in Portland, Oregon during the Portland Winter Light Festival 2023. An accompanying research project asked: How do outdoor digital installations of classical music performance impact people's feelings about classical music performance? How do outdoor digital installations of classical music performance impact people's feelings about the urban environment after dark? Employing contextual observation and semi-structured interviews with a total of 117 attendees, and building on and evaluating theories of observing media audiences in urban contexts, placemaking (digital, creative, and mobile), and expanded cinema (namely montage and dispositif), the research found that group size and dynamics had a strong effect on the length of engagement with the work, that most participants used their digital devices to capture and share the experience outside of the site, that sound was crucial in creating a communal and comfortable space, as well as expanding the footprint of the performance, and that classical music in particular helped to challenge the narrative expectations of this particular public space, deepening people's connection to one another in the space. The findings may be useful for shaping both the design of digital and creative placemaking initiatives, as well as further experimentation with the presentation of classical music performance in public space.

References

  1. Zlatan Krajina. 2019. Media audiences in the urban context. The Routledge Companion to Urban Media and Communication (2019), 387–396. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315211633-41. 387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Zlatan Krajina [1], 387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zlatan Krajina. 2013. Negotiating the mediated city. (2013). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315882833. 45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zlatan Krajina [3], 45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marek Franěk, Lukáš Režný, and Denis Šefara. 2020. The effect of music on the perception of outdoor urban environment. PeerJ 8 (2020), 1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9770. 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Marek Franěk, Lukáš Režný, and Denis Šefara [5], 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yalcin Yildirim and Mahyar Arefi. 2022. Sense of place and sound: Revisiting from multidisciplinary outlook. Sustainability 14, 18 (2022), 11508. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su141811508 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Qi Meng, Tingting Zhao, and Jian Kang. 2018. Influence of music on the behaviors of crowd in urban open public spaces. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00596 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Levin Monroe. 1998. Notes on Music: Arts Project Becoming Reality. (July 1998). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ayse Gul Gemci and Bahar Ferah. 2020. A triangulation process of street music in public spaces: A case study of Istanbul's Istiklal Avenue. Open House International 45, 4 (2020), 427–448. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ohi-05-2020-0039. 433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ayse Gul Gemci and Bahar Ferah [10], 433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Morten Breinbjerg. 2012. Urban sound interfaces: poetic approaches to media architecture. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference: Participation (MAB '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2421076.2421083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Project for Public Spaces. 2007. “What Is Placemaking?”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Louis-Etienne Dubois, H.Onur Bodur, Jonathon Anderson, Dogan Tirtiroglu, and Frederic Dimanche. 2023. Augmenting places: The impact of placemaking on behavioral intentions. City, Culture and Society 32 (2023), 100502. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100502. 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Louis-Etienne Dubois, H.Onur Bodur, Jonathon Anderson, Dogan Tirtiroglu, and Frederic Dimanche [14], 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alan A. Lew. 2017. Tourism Planning and place making: Place-making or placemaking? Tourism Geographies 19, 3 (2017), 448–466. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1282007. 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nicole Basaraba. 2021. The emergence of creative and digital place-making: A scoping review across disciplines. New Media & Society (2021), 146144482110449. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044942. 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nicole Basaraba [17], 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Marie-Laure Ryan, Kenneth E. Foote, and Moaz Azaryahu. 2016. Narrating Space/Spatializing Narrative: Where Narrative Theory and Geography Meet. The Ohio State University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Germaine Halegoua and Erika Polson. 2021. Exploring ‘digital placemaking.’ Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27, 3 (2021), 573–578. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13548565211014828 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Claude Fortin. 2016. Recasting the data sublime in media architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Media Architecture Biennale (MAB). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2946803.2946809Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Foth, M. (2017). Some thoughts on digital placemaking. In H. M. Hausler, M. Tomitsch, L. Hespanhol, & G. Tscherteu (Eds.), Media architecture compendium: Digital placemaking (pp. 203–205). avedition GmbH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Germaine R. Halegoua. 2020. The Digital City. NYU Press. 198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Miguel Fernández Labayen and Irene Gutierrez. 2021. Digital placemaking as survival tactics: Sub-Saharan migrants’ videos at the Moroccan–Spanish border. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27, 3 (2021), 664–678. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856520982974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Benjamin Stokes, François Bar, Karl Baumann, Ben Caldwell, and Andrew Schrock. 2021. Urban furniture in digital placemaking: Adapting a storytelling payphone across Los Angeles. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27, 3 (2021), 711–726. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856521999181 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Dave Colangelo. 2019. The Building as Screen. Amsterdam University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeburger, J. (2012). Designing and evaluating mobile multimedia user experiences in public urban places: Making sense of the field. In D. Tjondronegoro (Ed.), Mobile multimedia - User and technology perspectives (pp. 117–132). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/39050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Seeburger, J. (2010). Capital music: personal expression with a public display of song choice. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, 777–780. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1869027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Seeburger, J. (2012). The sound of music: sharing song selections between collocated strangers in public urban places. In E. Rukzio (Ed.), MUM ’12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (pp. 1–10). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2406367.2406409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nanna Verhoeff. 2012. Mobile Screens. Amsterdam University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Erin Sutherland. 2021. Rediscovering campus: Urban plaza is Portland State's front door. (July 2021). Retrieved February 20, 2023 from https://insideportlandstate.pdx.edu/2021/07/12/rediscovering-campus-urban-plaza-is-portland-states-front-door/#:∼:text=The%20Urban%20Plaza%20is%20an,between%205th%20and%206th%20Avenues. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Carl Abbott. 2014. The Landscape: Urban Center Plaza (2014). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin Tomitsch. 2018. Design. Think. Make. Break. Repeat. BIS Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. R. Longhurst. 2009. Interviews: In-depth, semi-structured. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2009), 580–584. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044910-4.00458-2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Germaine R. Halegoua [23], 198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ombra Musici II: Classical Music Performance and Public Space

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MAB '23: Proceedings of the 6th Media Architecture Biennale Conference
          June 2023
          187 pages

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 March 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate27of68submissions,40%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format