skip to main content
10.1145/3627673.3679886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

CMG: A Causality-enhanced Multi-view Graph Model for Stock Trend Prediction

Published: 21 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The stock trend prediction problem refers to forecasting future stock price trends. In recent years, some methods discovered causal relations between stocks to address this problem. However, traditional causal discovery methods face unique challenges in the stock market, as they fail to uncover accurate causal relationships when a distribution shift happens in stock. Additionally, current methods also overlook the commonalities and differences between stock relations. To address these shortcomings, we propose a causal-enhanced multi-view temporal graph model, named CMG. This method explores comprehensive causal relations by incorporating distribution shift confounder and constructs a multi-view contrastive learning module to unearth the commonalities and differences between stock relations, thereby enabling more accurate stock trend predictions. Further experimental results and investment simulations demonstrate the effectiveness and profitability of CMG.

References

[1]
Shaojie Bai, J Zico Kolter, and Vladlen Koltun. 2018. An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint:1803.01271 (2018).
[2]
Yingmei Chen, Zhongyu Wei, and Xuanjing Huang. 2018. Incorporating corporation relationship via graph convolutional neural networks for stock price prediction. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM CIKM. 1655--1658.
[3]
Dawei Cheng, Fangzhou Yang, Sheng Xiang, and Jin Liu. 2022. Financial time series forecasting with multi-modality graph neural network. Pattern Recognition 121 (2022), 108218.
[4]
Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint:1412.3555 (2014).
[5]
Yiqi Deng, Yuzhi Liang, and Siu-Ming Yiu. 2024. Towards interpretable stock trend prediction through causal inference. Expert Systems with Applications 238 (2024), 121654.
[6]
Qianggang Ding, Sifan Wu, Hao Sun, Jiadong Guo, and Jian Guo. 2020. Hierarchical Multi-Scale Gaussian Transformer for Stock Movement Prediction. In IJCAI. 4640--4646.
[7]
Fuli Feng, Huimin Chen, Xiangnan He, Ji Ding, Maosong Sun, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2018. Enhancing stock movement prediction with adversarial training. arXiv preprint:1810.09936 (2018).
[8]
Mingming Gong, Kun Zhang, Bernhard Schölkopf, Clark Glymour, and Dacheng Tao. 2017. Causal discovery from temporally aggregated time series. In Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: proceedings of the... conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2017. NIH Public Access.
[9]
Arthur Gretton, Kenji Fukumizu, Choon Teo, Le Song, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alex Smola. 2007. A kernel statistical test of independence. Advances in neural information processing systems 20 (2007).
[10]
Juyong Jiang, Peiyan Zhang, Yingtao Luo, Chaozhuo Li, Jae Boum Kim, Kai Zhang, Senzhang Wang, Xing Xie, and Sunghun Kim. 2023. AdaMCT: adaptive mixture of CNN-transformer for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 976--986.
[11]
Raehyun Kim, Chan Ho So, Minbyul Jeong, Sanghoon Lee, Jinkyu Kim, and Jaewoo Kang. 2019. Hats: A hierarchical graph attention network for stock movement prediction. arXiv preprint:1908.07999 (2019).
[12]
Samantha Kleinberg. 2011. A logic for causal inference in time series with discrete and continuous variables. In Twenty-Second IJCAI.
[13]
Jie Lu, Anjin Liu, Fan Dong, Feng Gu, Joao Gama, and Guangquan Zhang. 2018. Learning under concept drift: A review. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 31, 12 (2018), 2346--2363.
[14]
Andrew L Maas, Awni Y Hannun, Andrew Y Ng, et al. [n. d.]. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models.
[15]
Christopher Meek. 1995. Strong Completeness and Faithfulness in Bayesian Networks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (Montréal, Qué, Canada) (UAI'95). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 411--418.
[16]
Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, USA.
[17]
Judea Pearl et al. 2000. Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversityPress 19, 2 (2000), 3.
[18]
Ramit Sawhney, Shivam Agarwal, Arnav Wadhwa, and Rajiv Shah. 2020. Deep attentive learning for stock movement prediction from social media text and company correlations. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 8415--8426.
[19]
Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen, Antti Kerminen, and Michael Jordan. 2006. A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. JMLR 7, 10 (2006).
[20]
Peter Spirtes, Clark N Glymour, and Richard Scheines. 2000. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press.
[21]
Petar Velickovic, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, Yoshua Bengio, et al. 2017. Graph attention networks. stat 1050, 20 (2017), 10--48550.
[22]
Heyuan Wang, Tengjiao Wang, Shun Li, Shijie Guan, Jiayi Zheng, and Wei Chen. 2021. Heterogeneous Interactive Snapshot Network for Review-Enhanced Stock Profiling and Recommendation. IJCAI.
[23]
Gerald Woo, Chenghao Liu, Doyen Sahoo, Akshat Kumar, and Steven Hoi. 2022. CoST: Contrastive Learning of Disentangled Seasonal-Trend Representations for Time Series Forecasting. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=PilZY3omXV2
[24]
Sheng Xiang, Dawei Cheng, Chencheng Shang, Ying Zhang, and Yuqi Liang. 2022. Temporal and Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Financial Time Series Prediction. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM CIKM. 3584--3593.
[25]
Wentao Xu, Weiqing Liu, Lewen Wang, Yingce Xia, Jiang Bian, Jian Yin, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2021. Hist: A graph-based framework for stock trend forecasting via mining concept-oriented shared information. arXiv preprint:2110.13716 (2021).
[26]
Kun Zhang and Lai-Wan Chan. 2006. Extensions of ICA for causality discovery in the hong kong stock market. In ICONIP. Springer, 400--409.
[27]
Kun Zhang, Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Schölkopf. 2012. Kernelbased conditional independence test and application in causal discovery. arXiv preprint:1202.3775 (2012).
[28]
Liheng Zhang, Charu Aggarwal, and Guo-Jun Qi. 2017. Stock price prediction via discovering multi-frequency trading patterns. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 2141--2149.

Index Terms

  1. CMG: A Causality-enhanced Multi-view Graph Model for Stock Trend Prediction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '24: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    October 2024
    5705 pages
    ISBN:9798400704369
    DOI:10.1145/3627673
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 October 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. causal discovery
    2. contrastive learning
    3. stock trend prediction

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    • the National Key Research and Development Program

    Conference

    CIKM '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 88
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)88
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media