Ericsogate: Advancing Analytics and Management of Data from Diverse Sources within Ericsson Using Knowledge Graphs
Pages 4795 - 4802
Abstract
As data in the telecommunications industry becomes more voluminous and complex, extracting insightful information requires efficient and scalable systems that can effectively link and manage this data. This paper introduces a novel, multi-layered approach to managing interlinked data for Cloud Radio Access Network (CloudRAN) at Ericsson, utilizing Knowledge Graphs (KGs). Our system is structured into six distinct layers, each focusing on a specific aspect of managing interlinked data. This division enhances clarity and manageability, and promotes effective teamwork and collaborative development. A cornerstone of our architecture is its modularity, which enables the flexible exchange of components, such as the triple store, with minimal impact on the system's operations, ensuring longevity and adaptability to evolving technological trends. Moreover, we introduce novel applications in knowledge graph summarization and semantic search, specifically engineered for industrial decision-making. These innovations provide concise insights and actionable intelligence, fostering rapid and informed decision-making processes crucial for industry professionals. Finally, we discuss the lessons learned from deploying and utilizing this six-layer framework.
References
[1]
Amr Ahmed, Nino Shervashidze, Shravan Narayanamurthy, Vanja Josifovski, and Alexander J. Smola. 2013. Distributed large-scale natural graph factorization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW).
[2]
Dave Beckett and Brian McBride. 2004. RDF/XML syntax specification (revised). In World Wide Web Consortium (WWW).
[3]
David Beckett, Tim Berners-Lee, Eric Prudhommeaux, and Gavin Carothers. 2014. RDF 1.1 Turtle. In World Wide Web Consortium (WWW).
[4]
Sid Black, Stella Biderman, Eric Hallahan, Quentin Anthony, Leo Gao, Laurence Golding, Horace He, Connor Leahy, Kyle McDonell, Jason Phang, Michael Pieler, USVSN Sai Prashanth, Shivanshu Purohit, Laria Reynolds, Jonathan Tow, Ben Wang, and Samuel Weinbach. 2022. GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model. In ArXiv.
[5]
Blazegraph. 2024. Blazegraph. Retrieved from https://blazegraph.com/
[6]
Paolo Boldi and Sebastiano Vigna. 2004. The webgraph framework I: compression techniques. In Proceedings of the international conference on World Wide Web (WWW).
[7]
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In ArXiv.
[8]
Peter Buneman, Sanjeev Khanna, and Wang Chiew Tan. 2001. Why and Where: A Characterization of Data Provenance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Theory.
[9]
Douglas Burdick, Ronald Fagin, Phokion G Kolaitis, Lucian Popa, and Wang-Chiew Tan. 2016. A declarative framework for linking entities. In ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS).
[10]
Rajkumar Buyya, Satish Narayana Srirama, Giuliano Casale, Rodrigo Calheiros, Yogesh Simmhan, Blesson Varghese, Erol Gelenbe, Bahman Javadi, Luis Miguel Vaquero, Marco A. S. Netto, Adel Nadjaran Toosi, Maria Alejandra Rodriguez, Ignacio M. Llorente, Sabrina De Capitani Di Vimercati, Pierangela Samarati, Dejan Milojicic, Carlos Varela, Rami Bahsoon, Marcos Dias De Assuncao, Omer Rana, Wanlei Zhou, Hai Jin, Wolfgang Gentzsch, Albert Y. Zomaya, and Haiying Shen. 2018. A Manifesto for Future Generation Cloud Computing: Research Directions for the Next Decade. In ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR).
[11]
Andrew Carlson, Justin Betteridge, Bryan Kisiel, Burr Settles, Estevam R Hruschka, and Tom M Mitchell. 2010. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.
[12]
Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, James Bradbury, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Pengcheng Yin, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, Liam Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeff Dean, Slav Petrov, and Noah Fiedel. 2022. PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways. In ArXiv.
[13]
World Wide Web Consortium. 2024. RDF 1.1 N-Triples. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/
[14]
World Wide Web Consortium. 2024. SPARQL 1.1 Federated Query. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-federated-query-20130321/
[15]
The Apache Software Foundation. 2024. Apache Jena. Retrieved from https://jena.apache.org/
[16]
The Linux Foundation. 2024. Helm. Retrieved from https://helm.sh/
[17]
The Linux Foundation. 2024. Kubernetes. Retrieved from https://kubernetes.io/
[18]
David K. Hsiao. 1992. Federated Databases and Systems: Part I - A Tutorial on Their Data Sharing. In VLDB J.
[19]
Han Hu, Yonggang Wen, Tat-Seng Chua, and Xuelong Li. 2014. Toward Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial. In IEEE Access.
[20]
jsonld. 2024. jsonld. Retrieved from https://json-ld.org/
[21]
Kristen LeFevre and Evimaria Terzi. 2010. GraSS: Graph structure summarization. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining.
[22]
Wen-Syan Li and Chris Clifton. 2000. SEMINT: A tool for identifying attribute correspondences in heterogeneous databases using neural networks. In Data & Knowledge Engineering.
[23]
Yongsub Lim, U Kang, and Christos Faloutsos. 2014. Slashburn: Graph compression and mining beyond caveman communities. In IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[24]
Yike Liu, Tara Safavi, Abhilash Dighe, and Danai Koutra. 2018. Graph summarization methods and applications: A survey. In ACM computing surveys (CSUR).
[25]
Cynthia Matuszek, Michael Witbrock, John Cabral, and John DeOliveira. 2006. An introduction to the syntax and content of Cyc. In AAAI Spring Symposium.
[26]
Pauli Miettinen and Jilles Vreeken. 2014. Mdl4bmf: Minimum description length for boolean matrix factorization. In ACM transactions on knowledge discovery from data (TKDD).
[27]
Hyun Jin Moon, Carlo A Curino, and Carlo Zaniolo. 2010. Scalable architecture and query optimization fortransaction-time dbs with evolving schemas. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data.
[28]
Amihai Motro and Peter Buneman. 1981. Constructing superviews. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data.
[29]
Ontotext. 2024. GraphDB. Retrieved from https://graphdb.ontotext.com/
[30]
Lassila Ora. 1999. Resource Description Framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. In World Wide Web Consortium (WWW).
[31]
Abdelghny Orogat and Ahmed El-Roby. 2021. CBench: Demonstrating Comprehensive Evaluation of Question Answering Systems over Knowledge Graphs Through Deep Analysis of Benchmarks. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB).
[32]
Abdelghny Orogat, Isabelle Liu, and Ahmed El-Roby. 2021. CBench: Towards Better Evaluation of Question Answering Over Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB).
[33]
Xinghao Pan, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, Samet Oymak, Benjamin Recht, Kannan Ramchandran, and Michael I Jordan. 2015. Parallel correlation clustering on big graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[34]
Matteo Riondato, David Garcia-Soriano, and Francesco Bonchi. 2017. Graph summarization with quality guarantees. In Data mining and knowledge discovery.
[35]
Cambridge Semantics. 2024. AnzoGraph. Retrieved from https://cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/
[36]
Zeqian Shen, Kwan-Liu Ma, and Tina Eliassi-Rad. 2006. Visual analysis of large heterogeneous social networks by semantic and structural abstraction. In IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics.
[37]
OpenLink Software. 2024. Virtuoso. Retrieved from https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/
[38]
Fabian M Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the international conference on World Wide Web (WWW).
[39]
Christina Unger, Lorenz Buhmann, Jens Lehmann, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Daniel Gerber, and Philipp Cimiano. 2012. Template-based question answering over RDF data. In Proceedings of the international conference on World Wide Web (WWW).
[40]
Stardog Union. 2024. Stardog. Retrieved from https://www.stardog.com/
[41]
Denny Vrandecic and Markus Krotzsch. 2014. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. In Communications of the ACM.
[42]
Gerhard Weikum, Xin Luna Dong, Simon Razniewski, and Fabian Suchanek. 2021. Machine knowledge: Creation and curation of comprehensive knowledge bases. In Foundations and Trends in Databases.
[43]
Jun Wu, Zhifeng Zhang, Yu Hong, and Yonggang Wen. 2015. Cloud radio access network (C-RAN): a primer. In IEEE network.
[44]
Mohamed Yahya, Klaus Berberich, Shady Elbassuoni, and Gerhard Weikum. 2013. Robust question answering over the web of linked data. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM).
[45]
Gideon Zenz, Xuan Zhou, Enrico Minack, Wolf Siberski, and Wolfgang Nejdl. 2009. From keywords to semantic queries-Incremental query construction on the semantic web. In Journal of Web Semantics.
[46]
Ce Zhang, Christopher Re, Michael Cafarella, Christopher De Sa, Alex Ratner, Jaeho Shin, Feiran Wang, and Sen Wu. 2016. Deepdive: Declarative knowledge base construction. In Communications of the ACM.
[47]
Weiguo Zheng, Jeffrey Xu Yu, Lei Zou, and Hong Cheng. 2018. Question answering over knowledge graphs: question understanding via template decomposition. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB).
[48]
Qi Zhou, Chong Wang, Miao Xiong, Haofen Wang, and Yong Yu. 2007. SPARK: Adapting Keyword Query to Semantic Search. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC).
Index Terms
- Ericsogate: Advancing Analytics and Management of Data from Diverse Sources within Ericsson Using Knowledge Graphs
Recommendations
Using Knowledge Management to Give Context to Analytics and Big Data and Reduce Strategic Risk
At the moment, the phrases big data and analytics are often being used as if they were magic incantations that will solve all an organization's problems at a stroke. The reality is that data on its own, even with the application of analytics, will not ...
Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challenges
AbstractWith the explosive growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data, it has become vitally important to organize and represent the enormous volume of knowledge appropriately. As graph data, knowledge graphs accumulate and convey knowledge of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
5705 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 October 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
CIKM '24
Sponsor:
CIKM '24: The 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 21 - 25, 2024
ID, Boise, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 51Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)51
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in