skip to main content
10.1145/3627915.3628027acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of the Influence of Domestic Mainstream RTCM Differential Data on RTK Positioning Results

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In China, most provinces have established mature Continuous Operational Reference Systems (CORS) base stations, and enterprises such as Qianxun Spatial Intelligence Inc., (hereafter called Qianxun), China Mobile, and Six Points Technology have all deployed CORS sites one after another. Throughout this paper, the problem of differences in the accuracy of differential corrections broadcast by different types of CORS base stations is addressed, affecting Real Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning. As examples, CORS base stations of Qianxun and China Mobile broadcast differential data, and the same type of receivers are used to collect RTCM3 differential data, static raw data of mobile stations, and GGA data with similar baseline distances. After decoding the raw data, the ionospheric delay and tropospheric delay after double-differenced are back-projected through the combination of the ionosphere free, and time series graphs of their different time periods are obtained to compare the differences of RTCM3 differential data broadcast by different types of base stations. As a result of the method presented in this paper, it is possible to assess how ionospheric and tropospheric delay errors, along with other factors, affect real-time positioning accuracy in mapping, unmanned vehicles, and other fields. This is of great benefit for improving real-time positioning accuracy.

References

  1. Shi Zengkai, Li Chunyan, Sun Xiaoshuang, Dong Xurong, (2022). Stability analysis of Beijing CORS network reference stations[J]. Journal of Navigation and Positioning, 10(01): 64-68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Luo F (2014). Stability analysis and research of CORS reference stations[J]. Global Positioning System, 39(01): 41-45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang Yongqi, Lin Zhuo, Ding Xiaoguang and Su Lina (2014). Principle and application of network RTK technology based on CORS system[J]. Mapping standardization, 30(02): 9-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ye Y (2022). Application and analysis of cadastral survey based on GNSS-RTK technology[J]. Mapping and spatial geographic information, 45(12): 119-123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hou Xue, Ye Yuanbin, Lv Pengjun and Zhang Yongfeng (2022). Analysis of Beidou-3 RTK accuracy based on Guangdong CORS[J]. China High-Tech, 2022(22):62-64. DOI:10.13535/j.cnki.10-1507/n.2022.22.20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Deng Lizhong, Guo Jiming, Ma Jun, Zhao Yinzhi and Xu Yi (2022). GNSS RTK positioning alignment rod tilt compensation technology and accuracy analysis[J]. Geospatial Information, 20(10): 41-44+60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang Jianhong (2023). Analysis of network RTK measurement accuracy based on railroad banded Beidou CORS[J]. Railway Standard Design:1-7[2023-04-17]. DOI:10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.202207190003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wang Yanwei, Hu Wei and Sun Yangyang (2021). Several CORS station stability qualitative analysis methods[J]. Mapping Standardization, 37(02): 24-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bu Dongliang (2021). Comparison analysis of RTK accuracy between provincial CORS and thousand-search location CORS BDS network[J]. Mine Survey, 49(01): 61-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang X, Huang D F, Liao H, Zhou L T and Zhang D Q (2015). Research on the influence of CORS network structure on network RTK service performance[J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Information Science Edition), 40(07): 887-893.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tomaštík J, Mokroš M, Surový P, (2019). UAV RTK/PPK method—an optimal solution for map** inaccessible forested areas?[J]. Remote sensing, 11(6): 721.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ren Xuchao and Yao Rui (2022). Analysis of inertial GNSS-RTK reliability and accuracy loss law[J]. Urban Surveying, 2022(04): 108-112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang Min and Wang Jiexian (2019). Research and algorithm implementation of GNSS differential data decoding based on RTCM3.2 standard[J]. Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Management and Science and Technology (Upper Journal), 2019(04): 185-186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong Yongxiang (2018). Application of thousand location-seeking CORS-RTK in construction pit release sampling[J]. Global Positioning System, 43(6): 92-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao Meng, Wang Shunshun, Wang Cao, Zhu Huizhong and Xu Aigong (2022). Research on long baseline tri-frequency RTK algorithm in BDS[J]. Geodetic and Geodynamics, 42(01): 5-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mei J J, Gao C F and Zhang R C (2022). The ionospheric delay correction information coding and decoding method of RTCM standard[J]. Survey and Mapping Science, 47(04): 68-72+121. DOI:10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.04.009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of the Influence of Domestic Mainstream RTCM Differential Data on RTK Positioning Results

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAE '23: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
      October 2023
      358 pages
      ISBN:9798400700590
      DOI:10.1145/3627915

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format