skip to main content
10.1145/3628034.3628058acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Paper Tigers Using Social Norms: A Strategic Workshop Design for Maximising Collaborative Success

Published: 05 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Collaboration is seen as a cornerstone for contemporary success, yet managing its challenges is often overlooked. How can we harness its benefits while mitigating its drawbacks efficiently? This paper introduces a pedagogical pattern that delves into the transformative power of social norms within interactive workshops for participants pursuing individual projects. The pattern emerges from an observation that workshop participants show reluctance to invest mental energy unless immediate returns for their own projects are evident. Through the proposed workshop design, the aim is to strike a delicate balance: leveraging collective resources while avoiding social loafing. Practical experiences with this workshop design yielded positive outcomes. Participants showed more motivation and newfound willingness to actively contribute to interactive formats. Tailored for practitioners, educators, and facilitators in project-based learning, this paper offers a nuanced approach for fostering collaboration without solely relying on conventional group-based projects.

References

[1]
ActivizeTech. 2021. How to pitch your project at hackathons. Retrieved May 8, 2023 from https://activize.tech/2021/03/03/how-to-pitch-your-project-at-hackathons/
[2]
Christopher Alexander. 1964. Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Vol. 5. Harvard University Press.
[3]
Christopher Alexander. 1979. The timeless way of building. Vol. 1. New york: Oxford university press.
[4]
Wayne Baker and Jane E Dutton. 2017. Enabling positive social capital in organizations. In Exploring positive relationships at work, J Dutton and B Ragins (Eds.). Psychology Press, 325–346.
[5]
Myriam N Bechtoldt, Carsten KW De Dreu, Bernard A Nijstad, and Hoon-Seok Choi. 2010. Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of personality and social psychology 99, 4 (2010), 622.
[6]
Joseph Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Mary-Lynn Manns, Helen Sharp, Markus Voelter, Eugene Wallingford, Klaus Marquardt, Jane Chandler, and Astrid Fricke. 2012. The pedagagogical patterns project. Retrieved September 30, 2023 from http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/
[7]
Joseph Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Markus Volter, Marianna Sipos, Eugene Wallingford, Klaus Marquardt, Jane Chandler, Helen Sharp, and Mary Lynn Manns. 2012. Pedagogical patterns: advice for educators. Joseph Bergin Software Tools.
[8]
Gerard Briscoe. 2014. Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon. Creativeworks London 2 (2014).
[9]
Jerry M Burger, Jackeline Sanchez, Jenny E Imberi, and Lucia R Grande. 2009. The norm of reciprocity as an internalized social norm: Returning favors even when no one finds out. Social Influence 4, 1 (2009), 11–17.
[10]
Cheng-Huan Chen and Yong-Cih Yang. 2019. Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review 26 (2019), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
[11]
James O Coplien and Bobby Woolf. 1997. A pattern language for writers’ workshops. C Plus Plus Report 9 (1997), 51–60.
[12]
Berta de la Torre-Neches, Mariano Rubia-Avi, Jose Luis Aparicio-Herguedas, and Jairo Rodríguez-Medina. 2020. Project-based learning: an analysis of cooperation and evaluation as the axes of its dynamic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7, 1 (2020), 1–7.
[13]
David M Donahue, Jane Bowyer, and Dana Rosenberg. 2003. Learning with and learning from: Reciprocity in service learning in teacher education. Equity & Excellence in Education 36, 1 (2003), 15–27.
[14]
EuroPLoP. n.d. Call for papers. Retrieved October 7, 2023 from https://www.europlop.net/call-for-papers/
[15]
EuroPLoP. n.d. Patterns. Retrieved October 7, 2023 from https://www.europlop.net/patterns/
[16]
Edna B. Foa and Uriel G. Foa. 2012. Resource Theory of Social Exchange. In Handbook of Social Resource Theory: Theoretical Extensions, Empirical Insights, and Social Applications, Kjell Törnblom and Ali Kazemi (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, USA, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_2
[17]
Patrick Griffin and Esther Care. 2014. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
[18]
David Hall and Simone Buzwell. 2013. The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education 14, 1 (2013), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123
[19]
Ralf Hertwig and Till Grüne-Yanoff. 2017. Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12, 6 (2017), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617702496
[20]
Stefan Holtel and Imke Böse. 2022. Problem-Based Effectual Action Fuels Digital Mindsets. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (Irsee, Germany) (EuroPLop ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551902.3551979
[21]
Woei Hung, Mahnaz Moallem, and Nada Dabbagh. 2019. Social Foundations of Problem-Based Learning. In The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning. John Wiley & Sons, Chapter 3, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch3
[22]
David R Johnson, Linda Renzulli, Jackson Bunch, and Maria Paino. 2013. Everyday observations: Developing a sociological perspective through a portfolio term project. Teaching Sociology 41, 3 (2013), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X13480642
[23]
Anthony R Kaye. 2012. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers. Vol. 90. Springer Science & Business Media, Chapter Learning together apart, 1–24.
[24]
Christian Kohls. 2013. The theories of design patterns and their practical implications exemplified for e-learning patterns. Ph. D. Dissertation. Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt.
[25]
Olga Kozar. 2010. Towards Better Group Work: Seeing the Difference between Cooperation and Collaboration. English Teaching Forum 48, 2 (2010), 16–23.
[26]
Karel Kreijns, Paul A Kirschner, and Wim Jochems. 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 3 (2003), 335–353.
[27]
Hyunjeong Lee, David Parsons, Gyuhyun Kwon, Jieun Kim, Krassie Petrova, Eunju Jeong, and Hokyoung Ryu. 2016. Cooperation begins: Encouraging critical thinking skills through cooperative reciprocity using a mobile learning game. Computers & Education 97 (2016), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.006
[28]
Marina Micari and Pilar Pazos. 2014. Worrying About what others think: A social-comparison concern intervention in small learning groups. Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (2014), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787414544874
[29]
Mirriam-webster.com. 2023. project. Retrieved September 30, 2023 from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/project/
[30]
Eduardo Salas, Denise L Reyes, and Susan H McDaniel. 2018. The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead.American Psychologist 73, 4 (2018), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000334
[31]
Chantal MJH Savelsbergh, Beatrice IJM van der Heijden, and Rob F Poell. 2009. The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Research 40, 5 (2009), 578–607.
[32]
Jin Michael Splichal, Jun Oshima, and Ritsuko Oshima. 2018. Regulation of collaboration in project-based learning mediated by CSCL scripting reflection. Computers & Education 125 (2018), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.003
[33]
Karolina Sylwester and Gilbert Roberts. 2013. Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas. Evolution and Human Behavior 34, 3 (2013), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.009
[34]
Henri Tajfel and John C Turner. 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political Psychology. Psychology Press, 276–293.
[35]
Skift Meetings Studio Team. 2017. How to ensure your workshops are interactive and increase participation. Retrieved September 30, 2023 from https://meetings.skift.com/interactive-workshops-to-increase-participation/
[36]
Linda Torp and Sara Sage. 2002. Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (second ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[37]
Helen Williams. 2020. Will Students Engage If There Are No Grades? A Review of the Evidence, and an Experiment in Ungrading. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.0605

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EuroPLoP '23: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
July 2023
451 pages
ISBN:9798400700408
DOI:10.1145/3628034
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 February 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. group dynamics
  2. interactive workshops
  3. pedagogical design patterns
  4. project-based learning
  5. social reciprocity norm

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EuroPLoP 2023

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 216 of 354 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 35
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media