skip to main content
10.1145/3628454.3629551acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiaitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Am I Fighting Well? Fighting Game Commentary Generation With ChatGPT

Published:06 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new approach for leveraging ChatGPT in fighting game commentary generation task. Commentary generation often relies on deep learning techniques, which typically demand extensive data to achieve effectiveness. Large language models (LLMs) have become essential due to their remarkable ability to process data efficiently, thanks to their extensive training on vast datasets. Our proposed approach integrates the use of LLMs, specifically the GPT-3.5 model, for generating commentaries through the utilization of various prompts with data from the open-source fighting game, DareFightingICE. Four prompt variants are employed to assess the effectiveness of each prompt components. Objective evaluation using natural language metrics reveals that different prompt components significantly affect the generated commentaries. Additionally, subjective evaluation through a questionnaire reveals that prompts without parameter definitions received the highest preference from human evaluators. These results suggest that LLMs exhibit versatility in generating fighting game commentaries and hold promise for broader applications.

References

  1. Jordan Ashley. 2023. Best Fighting Games in 2023. https://www.esports.net/news/fighting-games/top-10-competitive-fighting-games/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Som S. Biswas. 2023. Role of Chat GPT in Public Health. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 51, 5 (01 May 2023), 868–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Julien Bousquet and Myriam Ertz. 2021. eSports: Historical Review, Current State, and Future Challenges. IGI Global, USA, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7300-6.ch001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cheuk-Yiu Chan, Chun-Chuen Hui, Wan-Chi Siu, Sin-wai Chan, and H. Anthony Chan. 2022. To Start Automatic Commentary of Soccer Game with Mixed Spatial and Temporal Attention. In TENCON 2022 - 2022 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON). IEEE, Hong Kong, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON55691.2022.9978078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jari Dahmen, M. Enes Kayaalp, Matthieu Ollivier, Ayoosh Pareek, Michael T. Hirschmann, Jon Karlsson, and Philipp W. Winkler. 2023. Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 31, 4 (01 Apr 2023), 1187–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07355-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fouad El Afi and Ouiddad Smail. 2021. The Rise of Video-Game Live Streaming: Motivations and Forms of Viewer Engagement. In 2021 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer-Verlag, USA, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Daniel Gros, Anna Hackenholt, Piotr Zawadzki, and Brigitta Wanner. 2018. Interactions of Twitch Users and Their Usage Behavior. In Social Computing and Social Media. Technologies and Analytics: 10th International Conference, SCSM 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II (Las Vegas, NV, USA). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91485-5_15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Business Research Insights. 2022. Fighting Games Market Size | Trends Analysis Report 2023. https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/fighting-games-market-101457Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tatsuya Ishigaki, Goran Topic, Yumi Hamazono, Hiroshi Noji, Ichiro Kobayashi, Yusuke Miyao, and Hiroya Takamura. 2021. Generating Racing Game Commentary from Vision, Language, and Structured Data. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Natural Language Generation. Association for Computational Linguistics, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 103–113. https://aclanthology.org/2021.inlg-1.11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ibrahim Khan, Thai Van Nguyen, Xincheng Dai, and Ruck Thawonmas. 2022. DareFightingICE Competition: A Fighting Game Sound Design and AI Competition. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). IEEE, China, 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoG51982.2022.9893624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Byeong Jo Kim and Yong Suk Choi. 2020. Automatic Baseball Commentary Generation Using Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (Brno, Czech Republic) (SAC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341105.3374063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Vikram Kumaran, Jonathan Rowe, Bradford Mott, and James Lester. 2023. SceneCraft: Automating Interactive Narrative Scene Generation in Digital Games with Large Language Models. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment 19, 1 (Oct. 2023), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v19i1.27504Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pascal Lessel, Maximilian Altmeyer, Julian Sahner, and Antonio Krüger. 2022. Streamer’s Hell - Investigating Audience Influence in Live-Streams Beyond the Game. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CHI PLAY, Article 252 (oct 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549515Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chenhui Zhang, Sheng Shen, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su, Huan Sun, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2023. AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents. arxiv:2308.03688 [cs.AI]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Feiyu Lu, Kaito Yamamoto, Luis H. Nomura, Syunsuke Mizuno, YoungMin Lee, and Ruck Thawonmas. 2013. Fighting game artificial intelligence competition platform. In 2013 IEEE 2nd Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE). IEEE, Japan, 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE.2013.6664844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. OpenAI. 2022. Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgptGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arxiv:2203.02155 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brian Richards. 1987. Type/Token Ratios: what do they really tell us?Journal of child language 14 (07 1987), 201–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012885Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Raquel Breejon Robinson, Ricardo Rheeder, Madison Klarkowski, and Regan L Mandryk. 2022. ”Chat Has No Chill”: A Novel Physiological Interaction For Engaging Live Streaming Audiences. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 562, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501934Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Thomas Hubert, Karen Simonyan, Laurent Sifre, Simon Schmitt, Arthur Guez, Edward Lockhart, Demis Hassabis, Thore Graepel, Timothy Lillicrap, and David Silver. 2020. Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature 588, 588 (Dec 2020), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03051-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Daniel Spadaro, Lawrence Robinson, and L. Smith. 1980. Assessing Readability of Patient Information Materials. American journal of hospital pharmacy 37 (03 1980), 215–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/37.2.215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nigar M. Shafiq Surameery and Mohammed Y. Shakor. 2023. Use Chat GPT to Solve Programming Bugs. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Engineering (IJITC) ISSN : 2455-5290 3, 01 (Jan. 2023), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijitc.31.17.22Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yasufumi Taniguchi, Yukun Feng, Hiroya Takamura, and Manabu Okumura. 2019. Generating Live Soccer-Match Commentary from Play Data. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (AAAI’19/IAAI’19/EAAI’19). AAAI Press, USA, Article 871, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pittawat Taveekitworachai, Febri Abdullah, Mury F. Dewantoro, Ruck Thawonmas, Julian Togelius, and Jochen Renz. 2023. ChatGPT4PCG Competition: Character-like Level Generation for Science Birds. arxiv:2303.15662 [cs.AI]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Zihan Wang and Naoki Yoshinaga. 2022. Esports Data-to-commentary Generation on Large-scale Data-to-text Dataset. arxiv:2212.10935 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V. Le. 2022. Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners. arxiv:2109.01652 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, Ed H. Chi, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Oriol Vinyals, Percy Liang, Jeff Dean, and William Fedus. 2022. Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD Survey Certification.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Piers R. Williams, Diego Perez-Liebana, and Simon M. Lucas. 2016. Ms. Pac-Man Versus Ghost Team CIG 2016 competition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG). IEEE, Greece, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2016.7860446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Michal Čertický, David Churchill, Kyung-Joong Kim, Martin Čertický, and Richard Kelly. 2019. StarCraft AI Competitions, Bots, and Tournament Manager Software. IEEE Transactions on Games 11, 3 (2019), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2018.2883499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Am I Fighting Well? Fighting Game Commentary Generation With ChatGPT

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IAIT '23: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology
      December 2023
      303 pages
      ISBN:9798400708497
      DOI:10.1145/3628454

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate20of47submissions,43%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format