Science Chaser app: A gamified learning journey into STEM activities
Authors: 
Eleni Chatzidaki, Sofia Papavlasopoulou, Hannie Gijlers, Tessa H.S. Eysink, 
Michail GiannakosAuthors Info & Claims
Eleni Chatzidaki, Sofia Papavlasopoulou, Hannie Gijlers, Tessa H.S. Eysink, Michail GiannakosAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 951 - 954
Abstract
Researchers have emphasized the importance of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education and recognized it as a key aspect in today's global landscape. Exploring STEM learning opportunities in educational settings, our research leverages the need to apply different learning approaches that enhance children's engagement. This work goes beyond learning in the classrooms and focuses on the various science-related everyday life experiences. Examples of these experiences can be a museum visit, an independent exploration through reading, watching, or practical experimentation from children. Therefore, we suggest the Science Chaser which is a gamified web app that aims to integrate STEM activities into educational settings for children, while at the same time collecting data about their “science proficiency” level. More specifically, Science Chaser serves as a science companion and provides users with a variety of science activities and challenges through a user friendly, enjoyable, and gamified environment. The Science Chaser acts as the driving force leading users beyond the conventional use of a web app, enabling active exploration of new scientific paths while allowing them to create their individual science journey by reporting and monitoring their activities. Apart from offering an engaging experience for children, the data collected through Science Chaser offers evidence-based insights into the effectiveness of science activities.
References
[1]
Lyn D. English. 2016. STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education 3, Article 3 (March 2016), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
[2]
Elisabeth R. McClure, Lisa Guernsey, Douglas H. Clements, Susan N. Bales, Jennifer Nichols, Nat Kendall-Taylor, and Michael H. Levine. 2017. STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. 1900 Broadway, New York, NY.
[3]
Bernard Schiele. 2021. Science museums and centres: evolution and contemporary trends, Vol. 1: Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (3rd. ed.). Routledge, London.
[4]
Ching-Huei Chen, Wen-Pi Chan, Kun Huang, and Chin-Wen Liao. 2022. Supporting informal science learning with metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality: Effects on science knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load. Research in Science & Technological Education 41, 4 (Jan. 2023), 1480-1495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629.
[5]
Tobías Martín-Páez, David Aguilera, Francisco J. Perales-Palacios, and José M. Vílchez-González. 2019. What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education 103, 4 (Jul. 2019), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522.
[6]
Lieve Thibaut, Stijn Ceuppens, Haydée De Loof, Jolien De Meester, Leen Goovaerts, Annemie Struyf, Jelle Boeve-de Pauw, Wim Dehaene, Johan Deprez, Mieke De Cock, Luc Hellinckx, Heidi Knipprath, Greet Langie, Katrien Struyven, Didier Van de Velde, Peter Van Petegem, Fien Depaepe. 2018. Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education 3, 1, Article 2 (May 2018), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525.
[7]
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Jennifer M. Zosh, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, James H. Gray, Michael B. Robb, and Jordy Kaufman. 2015. Putting Education in “Educational” Apps: Lessons From the Science of Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16, 1 (Apr. 2015), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721.
[8]
Marisa Meyer, Jennifer M. Zosh, Caroline McLaren, Michael Robb, Harlan McCaffery, Roberta Michnick Golinkoffd, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, and Jenny Radesky. 2021. How educational are “educational” apps for young children? App store content analysis using the Four Pillars of Learning framework. Journal of Children and Media 15, 4 (Feb. 2021), 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516.
[9]
Jennifer M. Zosh, Sarah R. Lytle, Roberta M. Golinkoff, and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek. 2017. Putting the Education Back in Educational Apps: How Content and Context Interact to Promote Learning, Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood: The Effects of Content and Context on Learning and Development (1st. ed.). Springer International Publishing (2017), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_17.
[10]
Ahmet S. Konca, Burcu Izci, and Ahmet Simsar. 2023. Evaluating popular STEM applications for young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 32, 1 (Jul. 2023), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2023.2221414.
[11]
Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), January 6-9, 2014, Waikoloa, HI, USA. IEEE, 3025-3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377.
[12]
Juho Hamari. 2013. Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12, 4 (Jul.-Aug. 2013), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004.
[13]
Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th. International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '11), September 28-30, 2011, Tampere, Finland. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040.
[14]
Sebastian Deterding. 2012. Gamification: designing for motivation. Interactions ACM 19, 4 (Jul. 2012), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212883.
[15]
Shurui Bai, Khe Foon Hew, and Biyun Huang. 2020. Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review 30, (Jun. 2020), 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322.
[16]
Darina Dicheva, Christo Dichev, Gennady Agre and Galia Angelova. 2015. Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of educational technology & society 18, 3 (Jul. 2015), 75-88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.75.
[17]
Feiran Zhang, Hanne Brynildsrud, Sofia Papavlasopoulou, Kshitij Sharma, and Michail Giannakos. 2023. Experiverse: Exploring an experiment-based gamification application for motivating children to science learning in an informal setting. In Proceedings of the 2023 Symposium on Learning, Design and Technology (LDT ’23), June 2023, Evanston, IL, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594781.3594799.
[18]
Karen Dahl Aarhus, Julie Holte Motland, Feiran Zhang, and Sofia Papavlasopoulou. 2023. Development and Evaluation of a Gamified Application for Environmental Education: coralQuest. In Proceedings of the 15th. International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning Conference (IMCL), November 9-10, 2023, Thessaloniki, Greece. Springer, 374-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54327-2_38.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54327-2_38.%3c/
[19]
José P. Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark Patterns in the Design of Games. In Proceedings of the Foundations of Digital Games 2013 (FDG 2013), May 14-17, Chania, Crete, Greece, 39-46.
[20]
Dan Fitton, Janet C. Read. 2019. Creating a Framework to Support the Critical Consideration of Dark Design Aspects in Free-to-Play Apps. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘19), June 12-15, Boise ID USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323136.
Index Terms
- Science Chaser app: A gamified learning journey into STEM activities
Recommendations
STEM project activities for pK-12 students: What it takes to make it happen
2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)This paper discusses the work-in-progress to set up and deliver Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) project activities with critical Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) components for STEM students across the different school ...
Co-Curricular Activities in Computer Science Departments
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationAcademic co-curricular activities (e.g., programming contests, hackathons, student ACM clubs, tutoring, internships, undergrad research) are popular with students, may promote academic engagement, and can give a leg up to students applying for jobs and ...
Designing Inclusive STEM Activities: A Comparison of Playful Interactive Experiences Across Gender
IDC '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenThe STEM toy market is primarily designed for, and targeted to, boys. Even the Maker Movement, which has been hailed as movement for all types of people, is dominated by males. In this paper, we take a mixed-methods approach to identify the affordances ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
1049 pages
ISBN:9798400704420
DOI:10.1145/3628516
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 17 June 2024
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
IDC '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%
Upcoming Conference
IDC '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 115Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)115
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format