skip to main content
10.1145/3628797.3628992acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoictConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimizing GANs using Relativistic Discriminator with Margin Losses for Semi-supervised Learning

Published: 07 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce a novel framework, termed RMGANs, that merges Relativistic Generative Adversarial Networks (RGANs) with Margin Losses. This framework capitalizes on the strengths of both RGANs’ discriminators, which assess the realism of real and fake data, and the advantages of Margin Losses, well-known for their ability to create distinct class separation. We apply this combination to the problem of semi-supervised learning (SSL). Our study delves into the architecture of RMGANs, provides a mathematical analysis to assess the impact of margin utilization on RMGAN losses, and offers guidance on choosing hyper-parameters. We also conduct experiments across the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. The empirical results clearly demonstrate RMGANs’ effectiveness in achieving higher accuracy compared to the state-of-the-art work (MarginGAN) in the SSL fashion.

References

[1]
A. Agrawala. 1970. Learning with a probabilistic teacher. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 16, 4 (1970), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1970.1054472
[2]
Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining Labeled and Unlabeled Data with Co-Training. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (Madison, Wisconsin, USA) (COLT’ 98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/279943.279962
[3]
Yanwen Chong, Yun Ding, Qing Yan, and Shaoming Pan. 2020. Graph-based semi-supervised learning: A review. Neurocomputing 408 (2020), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.130
[4]
Jiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Jing Yang, Niannan Xue, Irene Kotsia, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. 2022. ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44, 10 (2022), 5962–5979. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3087709
[5]
Jinhao Dong and Tong Lin. 2019. MarginGAN: Adversarial Training in Semi-Supervised Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NIPS 2019). 10440–10449.
[6]
S. Fralick. 1967. Learning to recognize patterns without a teacher. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13, 1 (1967), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053952
[7]
Ian Goodfellow 2014. Generative Adversarial Nets. In Proc. NIPS 2014. Montreal, Canada, 2672–2680.
[8]
Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau. 2019. The Relativistic Discriminator: A Key Element Missing from Standard GAN. In Proc. ICLR 2019. New Orleans, USA.
[9]
Samuli Laine and Timo Aila. 2017. Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learning. arxiv:1610.02242 [cs.NE]
[10]
Dong-Hyun Lee. 2013. Pseudo-Label : The Simple and Efficient Semi-Supervised Learning Method for Deep Neural Networks. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18507866
[11]
Chongxuan Li, Kun Xu, Jun Zhu, and Bo Zhang. 2017. Triple Generative Adversarial Nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 31. Curran Associates, Inc.
[12]
Weiyang Liu, Yandong Wen, Zhiding Yu, Ming Li, Bhiksha Raj, and Le Song. 2018. SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognition. arXiv abs/1704.08063v4 (2018).
[13]
Cuong V. Nguyen, Tien-Dung Cao, Tram Truong-Huu, Khanh N. Pham, and Binh T. Nguyen. 2021. An Empirical Study on GANs with Margin Cosine Loss and Relativistic Discriminator. arxiv:2110.11293 [cs.CV]
[14]
Mohammad Peikari, Sherine Salama, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, and Anne L. Martel. 2018. A Cluster-then-label Semi-supervised Learning Approach for Pathology Image Classification. Scientific Reports 8, 1 (2018), 7193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24876-0
[15]
Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. 2016. Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.). http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06434
[16]
H. Scudder. 1965. Probability of error of some adaptive pattern-recognition machines. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 11, 3 (1965), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1965.1053799
[17]
Jost Tobias Springenberg. 2016. Unsupervised And Semi-supervised Learning With Categorical Generative Adversarial Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
[18]
Hao Wang 2018. CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition. In Proc. CVPR 2018. Utah, USA.

Index Terms

  1. Optimizing GANs using Relativistic Discriminator with Margin Losses for Semi-supervised Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SOICT '23: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology
    December 2023
    1058 pages
    ISBN:9798400708916
    DOI:10.1145/3628797
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 December 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Angular Margin
    2. Cosine Margin
    3. GANs
    4. Margin Losses
    5. Relativistic Discriminator
    6. Semi-supervised Learning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    SOICT 2023

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 318 submissions, 46%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 35
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media