skip to main content
10.1145/3629296.3629304acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Novel Two-Stage Personalized Learning Path Recommendation Approach for E-learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the context of e-learning, learners often struggle to make informed decisions about what and how to learn when they have access to a vast array of learning resources. To address this issue, several approaches have been proposed from different perspectives, aiming to generate personalized learning paths for e-learners. These approaches include learner-based, knowledge-based, and hybrid recommendation methods. Among them, hybrid methods have emerged as a promising solution for personalized learning path recommendations, as they combine the strengths of both learner-based and knowledge-based approaches. However, existing hybrid methods typically employ exhaustive techniques to determine optimal paths by extracting all possible learning paths. This approach can be time-consuming and computationally expensive. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel two-stage personalized learning path recommendation approach that integrates concept map and an improved genetic algorithm. We conducted computational experiments using diverse simulation datasets to assess the effectiveness of our proposed method. The experimental results indicate that our approach surpasses other competing methods in terms of both performance and robustness.

References

  1. Maiti Monica, and Priyaadharshini Manickavasagam. 2022. Recommender System for Low Achievers in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12, 12(DEC. 2022),1390-1398. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1763Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sarwar Sohail, García-Castro Raúl, Qayyum Zia Ul, Safyan Muhammad, Munir Faisal, and Iqbal Muddesar. 2018. Ontology Based e-Learning Systems: A Step towards Adaptive Content Recommendation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8, 10(OCT. 2018) ,700-705. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJIET.2018.8.10.1125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Kaewkiriya Thongchai, Utakrit Nattavee, and Tiantong Monchai. 2016. The Design of a Rule Base for an e-Learning Recommendation System Base on Multiple Intelligences. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 3(MAR. 2016),206-210. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Liu Gang, and Hao Tianyong. 2012. User-based Question Recommendation for Question Answering System. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2, 3(JUN. 2012), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2012.v2.120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jafarkarimi1 Hosein, Hiang Sim Alex Tze, and Saadatdoost Robab. 2012. A Naïve Recommendation Model for Large Databases. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2, 3(JUN. 2012), 216-219. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2012.V2.113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Long III* Robert W., and Watanabe Hiroaki. 2023. Teacher Recommendations for Writing Programs in Japanese Universities. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13, 4(APR. 2023), 650-657. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.4.1849Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marcelo de Oliveira Costa Machado, Natalie Ferraz Silva Bravo, Andre Ferreira Martins, Heder Soares Bernardino, Eduardo Barrere, and Jairo Francisco de Souza. 2021. Metaheuristic-based adaptive curriculum sequencing approaches: a systematic review and mapping of the literature. Artif Intell Rev, 54, 1(JAN. 2021), 711-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09864-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Amir Hossein Nabizadeh, Jose Paulo Leal, Hamed N. Rafsanjani, and Rajiv Ratn Shah. 2020. Learning path personalization and recommendation methods: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Expert Systems with Applications, 159(NOV. 2020). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113596Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Eugenijus Kurilovas, Inga Zilinskiene, and Valentina Dagiene. 2015. Recommending suitable learning paths according to learners’ preferences: Experimental research results. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(OCT. 2015), 945-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pragya Dwivedi, Vibhor Kant, and Kamal K. Bharadwaj. 2018. Learning path recommendation based on modified variable length genetic algorithm. Education and information technologies, 23, 2(MAR. 2018), 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9637-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yuwen Zhou, Changqin Huang, Qintai Hu, Jia Zhu, and Yong Tang. 2018. Personalized learning full-path recommendation model based on LSTM neural networks. Information sciences, 444(MAY. 2018),135-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Guillaume Durand, Nabil Belacel, and Francois LaPlante. 2013. Graph theory based model for learning path recommendation. Information Sciences, 251(DEC. 2013), 10-21. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yanxia Pang, Na Wang, Ying Zhang, Yuanyuan Jin, Wendi Ji, and Wenan Tan. 2019. Prerequisite-related MOOC recommendation on learning path locating. Computational Social Networks, 6(AUG. 2019), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-019-0065-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jiaqi Gao, Qianhui Liu, and Win-Bin Huang. 2021. Learning Path Generator Based on Knowledge Graph. 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450148.3450155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Haiping Zhu, Feng Tian, Ke Wu, Nazaraf Shah, Yan Chen, Yifu Ni, Xinhui Zhang, Kuo-Ming Chao, and Qinghua Zheng. 2018. A multi-constraint learning path recommendation algorithm based on knowledge map. Knowledge-Based Systems, 143(MAR. 2018), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Daqian Shi, Ting Wang, Hao Xing, and Hao Xu. 2020. A learning path recommendation model based on a multidimensional knowledge graph framework for e-learning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 195(MAY. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105618Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Amir Hossein Nabizadeh, Danie Goncalves, Sandra Gama, Joaquim Jorge, and Hamed N. Rafsanjani. 2020. Adaptive learning path recommender approach using auxiliary learning objects. Computers & Education, 147(APR. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103777Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Fernando Gaxiola, Patricia Melin, Fevrier Valdez, Juan R. Castro, and Oscar Castillo. 2016. Optimization of type-2 fuzzy weights in backpropagation learning for neural networks using GAs and PSO. Applied Soft Computing, 38(JAN. 2016), 860-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hwai-En Tseng, Chien-Cheng Chang, Shih-Chen Lee, and Yu-Ming Huang. 2018. A block-based genetic algorithm for disassembly sequence planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 96(APR. 2018), 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pankaj Gupta, Masahiro Inuiguchi, Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat, and Mittal, Garima. 2013. Multiobjective credibilistic portfolio selection model with fuzzy chance-constraints. Information Sciences, 229(APR. 2013), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Novel Two-Stage Personalized Learning Path Recommendation Approach for E-learning
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICETC '23: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
        September 2023
        532 pages
        ISBN:9798400709111
        DOI:10.1145/3629296

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 January 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format