skip to main content
10.1145/3629479.3629506acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbqsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The use of Design Thinking in creating projects and improving customer value perception: an experience report on software projects at a Research and Development Institute in Amazonas

Published:06 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Context:The measure of success for a product is the extent to which it meets users’ needs. To meet these needs, it’s necessary to understand what they are. In this context, where the user and their needs are central to the success of a product, Design Thinking (DT) techniques are essential. Objective: This study presents the application of Design Thinking techniques in innovation projects at a significant Research and Development Institute in Manaus, aiming to enhance customer value perception and satisfaction with the deliverables. Method: The research strategy employed in this study was field research, the methods were exploratory case study and archival research, with quantitative and qualitative analyses conducted on the data. Results: It was possible to notice that there was an increase in customer satisfaction indicators through the utilization of Design Thinking (DT) techniques in the process of uncovering user needs. The CVP (Customer Value Perception), which assesses customer satisfaction concerning intermediate project deliverables, rose from 3.3 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2022, where score 1 represents the minimum and 5 the maximum rating. The NPS (Net Promoter Score), gauging customer value perception across all organization sectors, surged from -50 (Critical Zone) in 2016 to 71.4 (Quality Zone) in 2022, with -100 as the lowest and 100 as the highest achievable score. These data were collected considering the CVP and NPS surveys conducted between 2016 and 2022. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that implementing DT techniques assisted the Institute in achieving greater precision in its deliverables. In response to this insight, the Institute has established a laboratory to facilitate collaborative meetings and co-creation sessions to enhance customer engagement and foster project innovation.

References

  1. Mateen Ahmed Abbasi, Javeria Jabeen, Yasir Hafeez, D Batool, and Naila Fareen. 2015. Assessment of requirement elicitation tools and techniques by various parameters. Software Engineering 3, 2 (2015), 7–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Naiara Crislaine Alflen and Edmir Parada Vasques Prado. 2021. Técnicas de elicitação de requisitos no desenvolvimento de software: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento 10, 1 (2021), 39–49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alhejab Alhazmi and Shihong Huang. 2020. Integrating design thinking into scrum framework in the context of requirements engineering management. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering. 33–45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie Van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, 2001. Manifesto for agile software development. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Edna Dias Canedo, Anderson Jefferson Cerqueira, Alexandre V Papadópolis, and Aleteia Patricia F de Araujo. 2020. Application of Design Thinking for Requirements Elicitation in Mobile Applications. (2020), 6651–6660.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Edna Dias Canedo, Ana Carolina Dos Santos Pergentino, Angelica Toffano Seidel Calazans, Frederico Viana Almeida, Pedro Henrique Teixeira Costa, and Fernanda Lima. 2020. Design Thinking Use in Agile Software Projects: Software Developers’ Perception.. In ICEIS (2). 217–224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paulo Caroli. 2017. Lean inception. São Paulo, BR: Caroli. org (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lauriane Correa, Daniel Maria, Jean Carlos Bellio, Sabrina Marczak, and Tayana Conte. 2018. O uso de design thinking no apoio ao desenvolvimento de software: Um estudo de caso no contexto de academias de musculação. Cadernos do IME-Série Informática 41 (2018), 77–93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bill Davey and Chris Cope. 2008. Requirements Elicitation–What’s Missing?Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology 5 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruno Raphael de Carvalho Santos, Luana Bittencourt Saraiva, Claudete Barbosa Ruschival, Alef Vernon de Oliveira Santos, Eduardo Jorge Lira Antunes da Silva, Lúcio Vasconcellos Dias, and Nelson Kuwahara. 2021. Método do diamante duplo para o design de um aplicativo: Move in para a saúde e bem-estar. DAT Journal 6, 4 (2021), 314–337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Amarinildo Osório de SOUZA, Camilla Rosas GOMES, Jhonatas Lima de SOUZA, and Melissa Lima CABRAL. [n. d.]. Dificuldades na elaboração de um projeto publicitário por meio de uma experiência de aplicação com Design Thinking (DT). ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Franziska Dobrigkeit and Danielly de Paula. 2019. Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM joint meeting on European software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering. 1059–1069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Diuliane Valéria Prado dos SANTOS, Maria Eduarda Fagundes dos Santos, Tiago Costa Martins, and Karolini Melo Kulmann. 2020. Inovação em planejamento: a Lean Inception como metodologia de trabalho em Relações Públicas. Anais do Salão Internacional de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão 12, 2 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ronald J Ferguson, Michèle Paulin, and Jasmin Bergeron. 2010. Customer sociability and the total service experience: antecedents of positive word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of service management 21, 1 (2010), 25–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jennifer Hehn, Daniel Mendez, Falk Uebernickel, Walter Brenner, and Manfred Broy. 2019. On integrating design thinking for human-centered requirements engineering. IEEE Software 37, 2 (2019), 25–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Maria Meireles, Anderson Souza, Tayana Conte, and José Maldonado. 2021. Organizing the Design Thinking Toolbox: Supporting the Requirements Elicitation Decision Making. In Proceedings of the XXXV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 285–290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bashar Nuseibeh and Steve Easterbrook. 2000. Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering. 35–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rafael Parizi, Marina Moreira, Igor Couto, Sabrina Marczak, and Tayana Conte. 2020. A design thinking techniques recommendation tool: An initial and on-going proposal. In 19th Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lauriane Pereira, Rafael Parizi, Matheus Prestes, Sabrina Marczak, and Tayana Conte. 2021. Towards an understanding of benefits and challenges in the use of design thinking in requirements engineering. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 1338–1345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Frederick F Reichheld. 2003. The one number you need to grow. Harvard business review 81, 12 (2003), 46–55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Osama Sohaib, Hiralkumari Solanki, Navkiran Dhaliwa, Walayat Hussain, and Muhammad Asif. 2019. Integrating design thinking into extreme programming. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 10 (2019), 2485–2492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sabrina Rocha de Souza, Maria Alcimar Meireles, José Carlos Duarte, Jose Carlos Maldonado, and Tayana Conte. 2022. Design for IoT: An Experimental Study to Understand How Design Thinking Can Help in the Elicitation of Requirements for IoT Systems. In Proceedings of the XXI Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Klaas-Jan Stol and Brian Fitzgerald. 2020. Guidelines for conducting software engineering research. In Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering. Springer, 27–62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Magnus C Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, and Anders Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Masooma Yousuf and M Asger. 2015. Comparison of various requirements elicitation techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications 116, 4 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Mika Yrjölä, Timo Rintamäki, Hannu Saarijärvi, Johanna Joensuu, and Gauri Kulkarni. 2019. A customer value perspective to service experiences in restaurants. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 51 (2019), 91–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The use of Design Thinking in creating projects and improving customer value perception: an experience report on software projects at a Research and Development Institute in Amazonas

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SBQS '23: Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality
      November 2023
      391 pages
      ISBN:9798400707865
      DOI:10.1145/3629479

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate35of99submissions,35%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format