ABSTRACT
Background: Agile methods and practices have been consistently adopted in recent years as alternatives to traditional software development processes to address the ever-changing needs of IT organizations. In a previous systematic mapping study, we identified twelve critical success factors of agile transformations from a project management perspective. Objective: In this paper, we investigate how practitioners perceive the relevance of these factors and whether other factors should be considered. Method: We conducted a survey research involving project managers from several organizations undergoing agile transformations. Results: The participants’ perceptions provided valuable insights into the relevance of the critical success factors. Additionally, we identified five new critical success factors: organizational ambidexterity, use of tools and automation, breaking down organizational silos, team commitment, and alignment of organizational goals and expectations. These newly identified factors contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of organizations’ challenges during an agile transformation. Based on the results and the literature, we formulated three propositions representing recommendations that can foster agile transformation. Conclusions: The evidence gathered in this study indicates that the factors investigated previously are highly relevant. Moreover, organizations should consider them to enhance the chances of success of agile transformation initiatives.
- Samia Abdalhamid and Alok Mishra. 2017. Factors in agile methods adoption. TEM Journal 6, 2 (2017), 416.Google Scholar
- Paul S Adler, Barbara Goldoftas, and David I Levine. 1999. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization science 10, 1 (1999), 43–68.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abdalla Alhroub and Ayham AM Jaaron. 2019. Assessing agile project management practices: the case of Palestinian software development companies. Middle East Journal of Management 6, 1 (2019), 95–120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fahad S Altuwaijri and Maria Angela Ferrario. 2022. Factors affecting Agile adoption: An industry research study of the mobile app sector in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Systems and Software 190 (2022), 111347.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mc Andion and James B. Avey et al.2013. Anuário do trabalho na micro e pequena empresa 2013. RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea 3 (2013). Issue 3.Google Scholar
- Alan Andrade, Claudio Mattos, Alessandra Fortuna, Luiz Ramos, Rodrigo Santos, and Gleison Santos. 2023. Critical Success Factors of Agile Transformation Initiatives from a Project Management Perspective. ACM 1 (2023), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592813.3592936Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sidgley Andrade and Tania Fatima Tait. 2012. Uma aplicação do guia PMBOK na gestão de projetos de software. Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada 4, 1 (abr. 2012), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.5335/rbca.2013.1796Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hajer Ayed, Benoît Vanderose, and Naji Habra. 2017. Agile cultural challenges in Europe and Asia: insights from practitioners. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP). IEEE, IEEE, 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.33Google ScholarDigital Library
- Victor R Basili. 1992. Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Sussy Bayona, Jose A. Calvo-Manzano, and Tomás San Feliu. 2012. Critical Success Factors in Software Process Improvement: A Systematic Review. In Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Antonia Mas, Antoni Mesquida, Terry Rout, Rory V. O’Connor, and Alec Dorling (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Mike Beedle, Arie Van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, Jon Kern, Brian Marick, 2001. Manifesto for agile software development. Recuperado de http://agilemanifesto. org (2001).Google Scholar
- James W. Bishop and K. Dow Scott. 2000. An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000). Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.439Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christine V Bullen and John F Rockart. 1981. A primer on critical success factors. (1981).Google Scholar
- Ruben Burga, Chris Spraakman, Carson Balestreri, and Davar Rezania. 2022. Examining the transition to agile practices with information technology projects: Agile teams and their experience of accountability. International Journal of Project Management 40, 1 (2022), 76–87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Calnan and Alon Rozen. 2019. ING’s Agile transformation—Teaching an elephant to race. Journal of Creating Value 5, 2 (2019), 190–209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amadeu Silveira Campanelli, Dairton Bassi, and Fernando Silva Parreiras. 2017. Agile transformation success factors: a practitioner’s survey. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 364–379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amadeu Silveira Campanelli and Fernando Silva Parreiras. 2015. Agile methods tailoring–A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software 110 (2015), 85–100.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tsun Chow and Dac-Buu Cao. 2008. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of systems and software 81, 6 (2008), 961–971.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kieran Conboy, Sharon Coyle, Xiaofeng Wang, and Minna Pikkarainen. 2011. People over Process: Key Challenges in Agile Development. IEEE Software 28, 4 (2011), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2010.132Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karla Michele Barbosa da Silva and Simone Cristiane dos Santos. 2015. Critical factors in agile software projects according to people, process and technology perspective. In 2015 6th Brazilian Workshop on Agile Methods (WBMA). IEEE, 48–54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Digital.ai. 2021. 15th Annual State Of Agile Report. https://digital.ai/resource-center/analyst-reports/state-of-agile-report/. (Accessed on 12/06/2022).Google Scholar
- Kim Dikert, Maria Paasivaara, and Casper Lassenius. 2016. Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software 119 (2016), 87–108.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert B Duncan. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization 1, 1 (1976), 167–188.Google Scholar
- Amy Gallo. 2023. What Is Psychological Safety?https://hbr.org/2023/02/what-is-psychological-safety Harvard Business Review, last checked 24.07.2023.Google Scholar
- Taghi Javdani Gandomani and Mina Ziaei Nafchi. 2015. An empirically-developed framework for Agile transition and adoption: A Grounded Theory approach. Journal of Systems and Software 107 (2015), 204–219.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taghi Javdani Gandomani, Hazura Zulzalil, Abdul Azim Abdul Ghani, Abu Bakar Md Sultan, and Mina Ziaei Nafchi. 2013. Obstacles in moving to agile software development methods; at a glance. Journal of Computer Science 9, 5 (2013), 620.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taghi Javdani Gandomani, Hazura Zulzalil, and Mina Ziaei Nafchi. 2014. Agile Transformation: What is it about?. In 2014 8th. Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC). IEEE, 240–245.Google Scholar
- Anastasia Grass, Julia Backmann, and Martin Hoegl. 2020. From empowerment dynamics to team adaptability: exploring and conceptualizing the continuous agile team innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management 37, 4 (2020), 324–351.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Vol. 3. Mcgraw-hill New York.Google Scholar
- Philipp Hohl, Jil Klünder, Arie van Bennekum, Ryan Lockard, James Gifford, Jürgen Münch, Michael Stupperich, and Kurt Schneider. 2018. Back to the future: origins and directions of the “Agile Manifesto”–views of the originators. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development 6 (2018), 1–27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taghi Javdani Gandomani, Hazura Zulzalil, Abdul Azim Abd Ghani, Abu Bakar Md. Sultan, and Khaironi Yatim Sharif. 2013. Exploring key factors of pilot projects in agile transformation process using a grounded theory study. In Information and Software Technologies: 19th International Conference, ICIST 2013, Kaunas, Lithuania, October 2013. Proceedings 19. Springer, 146–158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miloš Jovanović, Antoni-Lluís Mesquida, Antonia Mas, and Ricardo Colomo-Palacios. 2020. Agile transition and adoption frameworks, issues and factors: a systematic mapping. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 15711–15735.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerson Junior, João Amaral, Patrícia Matsubara, and Valdemar Neto. 2015. Influences of Organizational Culture in the Adoption of Agile Methodologies in Information Systems Development A Systematic Mapping. In Anais do XI Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação. SBC, 227–234.Google Scholar
- Barbara Ann Kitchenham, David Budgen, and Pearl Brereton. 2015. Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews. Vol. 4. CRC press.Google Scholar
- Barbara A Kitchenham and Shari L Pfleeger. 2008. Personal opinion surveys. In Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Springer, 63–92.Google Scholar
- Robert P Leone, David A Aaker, and George S Day. 2018. Marketing research. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Alok Mishra, Samia Abdalhamid, Deepti Mishra, and Sofiya Ostrovska. 2021. Organizational issues in embracing Agile methods: an empirical assessment. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 12, 6 (2021), 1420–1433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mariano Montoni and Ana Regina Rocha. 2011. Uma Investigação sobre os Fatores Críticos de Sucesso em Iniciativas de Melhoria de Processos de Software. In Anais do X Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (Curitiba). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2011.15393Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahlomola Motingoe and Josef J Langerman. 2019. New organisational models that break silos in organisations to enable software delivery flow. In 2019 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE). IEEE, 341–348.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nannette P Napier, Lars Mathiassen, and Daniel Robey. 2011. Building contextual ambidexterity in a software company to improve firm-level coordination. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (2011), 674–690.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahmood Niazi, David Wilson, and Didar Zowghi. 2006. Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: an empirical study. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 11, 2 (2006), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.261 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/spip.261Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ronielton Rezende Oliveira, José Elenilson Cruz, and Roniton Rezende Oliveira. 2018. Fatores críticos de sucesso na gestão de projetos:: Análise dos indicadores que constituem os predecessores da estratégia, pessoas e operações. Gestão e Projetos: GeP 9, 3 (2018), 49–66.Google Scholar
- TMV de Oliveira. 2001. Amostragem não probabilística: adequação de situações para uso e limitações de amostras por conveniência, julgamento e quotas. Administração on line 2, 3 (2001), 01–10.Google Scholar
- Maria Paasivaara and Casper Lassenius. 2014. Communities of practice in a large distributed agile software development organization–Case Ericsson. Information and Software Technology 56, 12 (2014), 1556–1577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raul Pelagio Rodriguez, Ma Hechanova, and Ma Regina. 2014. A study of culture dimensions, organizational ambidexterity, and perceived innovation in teams. Journal of technology management & innovation 9, 3 (2014), 21–33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fabio Reginaldo and Gleison Santos. 2020. Challenges in Agile Transformation Journey: A Qualitative Study. In Proceedings of the 34th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 11–20.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Russo. 2021. The Agile Success Model: A Mixed-methods Study of a Large-scale Agile Transformation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 30, 4 (2021), 1–46.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nancy L Russo, Guy Fitzgerald, and Siamak Shams. 2013. Exploring adoption and use of agile methods: A comparative case study. (2013).Google Scholar
- Paula de Oliveira Santos and Marly Monteiro de Carvalho. 2021. Exploring the challenges and benefits for scaling agile project management to large projects: a review. Requirements Engineering (2021), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Elizandra Severgnini, Edwin Vladimir Cardoza Galdamez, and Valter Afonso Vieira. 2019. Efeitos do exploration, exploitation e ambidestria no desempenho das organizações de software. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 23 (2019), 111–134.Google Scholar
- Yatim Sharif. 2014. Exploring facilitators of transition and adoption to agile methods: a grounded theory study. Journal of Software 9, 7 (2014), 1666.Google Scholar
- Jayakanth Srinivasan and Kristina Lundqvist. 2010. Agile in India: Challenges and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 3rd India software engineering conference. 125–130.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dragan Stankovic, Vesna Nikolic, Miodrag Djordjevic, and Dac-Buu Cao. 2013. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects in former Yugoslavia IT companies. Journal of Systems and Software 86, 6 (2013), 1663–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.027Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dragan Stankovic, Vesna Nikolic, Miodrag Djordjevic, and Dac-Buu Cao. 2013. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects in former Yugoslavia IT companies. Journal of Systems and Software 86, 6 (2013), 1663–1678.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mateusz Trzeciak and Paulina Banasik. 2022. Motivators Influencing the Efficiency and Commitment of Employees of Agile Teams. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8, 4 (2022), 176.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hidde van Manen and Hans van Vliet. 2014. Organization-wide agile expansion requires an organization-wide agile mindset. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement: 15th International Conference, PROFES 2014, Helsinki, Finland, December 10-12, 2014. Proceedings 15. Springer, 48–62.Google Scholar
- Hany Wells, Darren Dalcher, and Hedley Smyth. 2015. The adoption of agile management practices in a traditional project environment: An IT/IS Case Study. In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, 4446–4453.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Surveying the Relevance of the Critical Success Factors of Agile Transformation Initiatives from a Project Management Perspective
Recommendations
Challenges in Agile Transformation Journey: A Qualitative Study
SBES '20: Proceedings of the XXXIV Brazilian Symposium on Software EngineeringContext: The agile transformation of an organization is influenced by different factors that can hinder the initiative's success, such as lack of adaptation of agile practices to the organizational context, selection of agile alternatives without using ...
Critical Success Factors of Agile Transformation Initiatives from a Project Management Perspective
SBSI '23: Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Information SystemsContext: Agile methods have been adopted as an alternative to meet the frequent changes in the IT industry and to address issues of quality, cost, speed, and efficiency in systems development processes. Problem: Managers are responsible for the ...
Empirical analysis of critical success factors for project management in global software development
ICGSE '19: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Global Software EngineeringContext: Global software development (GSD) is a well-recognized business model to achieve competitiveness in the current global market. However this model has its own challenges due to the complex nature of its development process. Project management is ...
Comments