ABSTRACT
Automobiles have gradually transformed from being mere means of transportation to becoming information-carrying entities second only to mobile devices. The scientific research on automotive products should not solely prioritize the technological applications of intelligent cockpits but should also contemplate the values and ethics in cockpit visual design. Ethical issues arising from technology form an integral concern within the attributes of intelligent cockpit artifacts. This paper conducts an analysis of the relationship between phenomena and essence, aiming to achieve a better understanding of the essence and principles of things by delving beyond surface appearances. It investigates the values and ethical considerations in the visual information design of intelligent vehicle cockpits, while also analyzing their value composition and equilibrium. Ultimately, the study concludes that the value equilibrium of intelligent cockpit visual interaction information design primarily encompasses designer value, user value, governmental value, and producer value. Within ethical objectives, designers should take a leading role, driving producers, governments, and users to collectively manifest their value and responsibility, thereby engendering a design outcome through the collaborative engagement of diverse stakeholders and enabling multifaceted societal oversight.
- [1] Yang, G. (2015). Value, Value Orientation and Kernel Value Orientation. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 01, 16-22.Google Scholar
- [2] Wang, Y., Zhang, W. W., & Xu, Y. Q. (2022). Value-Sensitive Intelligent Agents: Reflection on Social Responsibility of Intelligent Product Design. ZHUANGSHI, 09, 12-16.Google Scholar
- [3] Zhang, Y. (2021). Literature Review and Analysis of Industrial Design (2011-2020): The Power of Cultural (2) - Responsibility. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute (Fine Arts & Design), 04, 74-81.Google Scholar
- [4] Liu, S. M. (2022). The application and transcendence of the Basic Methods of moral Phenomenology in Marx's moral Philosophy. Marxism and Reality, 06, 94-100.Google Scholar
- [5] Wang, X.W (2015). "Internet plus" changes the attributes of cars and production mode. Internet of Things Technology, 08.033.Google Scholar
- [6] Chen, B., Sun, D., Zhou, J., Wong, W., & Ding, Z. (2020). A future intelligent traffic system with mixed autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles. Information Sciences, 529, 59-72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [7] Thomson, J. J. (1984). The trolley problem. Yale LJ, 94, 1395.Google Scholar
- [8] Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2015). Autonomous vehicles need experimental ethics: are we ready for utilitarian cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03346, 12.Google Scholar
- [9] Fleetwood, J. (2017). Public health, ethics, and autonomous vehicles. American journal of public health, 107(4), 532-537.Google Scholar
- [10] Laurel, B. (2018). Design Research: Methods and Perspectives (Chen H. Y., Trans.). Jiangsu Phoenix Fine Arts Publishing House, 235-236.Google Scholar
- [11] Cai, M. Y., & Wang, W. L. (2023). Review of Interaction Design in Automotive Intelligent Cockpit. Packaging Engineering, 44(6), 430-440.Google Scholar
- [12] Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.Google Scholar
- [13] Nash Jr, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 36(1), 48-49.Google Scholar
- [14] Borel, E. (1921). La théorie du jeu et les équations intégralesa noyau symétrique. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 173(1304-1308), 58.Google Scholar
- [15] Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- [16] Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1954). A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. American political science review, 48(3), 787-792.Google Scholar
- [17] Gao, J. W., & Niu, X. F. (2019). Coase, The Problem of Social Cost. Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
- [18] Norman, D. A. (2015). Design Psychology 4 Future Design (Xiao K., Trans.). CITIC Press.Google Scholar
- [19] Fang, J. J., Li, A. D., & Luan, L. C. (2020). The Contemporary Visual Design Value of Letterpress Printing Technology. Design, 202, 35(21), 97-99.Google Scholar
- [20] Papanek, V. J. (2020). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change (Zhou B., Trans.). Beijing Daily Press.Google Scholar
- [21] Yang, Z. (2012). Ethical Research on Product Design [Dissertation]. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
- [22] Burnett, H. S. (2009). Understanding the precautionary principle and its threat to human welfare. Social Philosophy and Policy, 26(2), 378-410.Google Scholar
- [23] Mitcham, C. (2022). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Recommendations
You want a piece of me? Paying your dues and getting your due in a distributed world
The paper offers a critical reflection, inspired by the insights of integrational linguistics, on the conception of thinking and action within the distributed cognition approach of Edwin Hutchins. Counterposing a fictional account of a mutiny at sea to ...
Technology as moral proxy: autonomy and paternalism by design
ETHICS '14: Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and TechnologyIn this paper I argue that in cases where technologies provide material answers to moral questions that arise in the use context, they can and should be characterized as moral proxies acting on behalf of a person. Because of this we can accurately ...
Comments