skip to main content
10.1145/3629606.3629647acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Value and Ethical Responsibility of Visual Interaction Information Design for Automotive Intelligent Cockpit

Published: 27 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Automobiles have gradually transformed from being mere means of transportation to becoming information-carrying entities second only to mobile devices. The scientific research on automotive products should not solely prioritize the technological applications of intelligent cockpits but should also contemplate the values and ethics in cockpit visual design. Ethical issues arising from technology form an integral concern within the attributes of intelligent cockpit artifacts. This paper conducts an analysis of the relationship between phenomena and essence, aiming to achieve a better understanding of the essence and principles of things by delving beyond surface appearances. It investigates the values and ethical considerations in the visual information design of intelligent vehicle cockpits, while also analyzing their value composition and equilibrium. Ultimately, the study concludes that the value equilibrium of intelligent cockpit visual interaction information design primarily encompasses designer value, user value, governmental value, and producer value. Within ethical objectives, designers should take a leading role, driving producers, governments, and users to collectively manifest their value and responsibility, thereby engendering a design outcome through the collaborative engagement of diverse stakeholders and enabling multifaceted societal oversight.

References

[1]
[1] Yang, G. (2015). Value, Value Orientation and Kernel Value Orientation. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 01, 16-22.
[2]
[2] Wang, Y., Zhang, W. W., & Xu, Y. Q. (2022). Value-Sensitive Intelligent Agents: Reflection on Social Responsibility of Intelligent Product Design. ZHUANGSHI, 09, 12-16.
[3]
[3] Zhang, Y. (2021). Literature Review and Analysis of Industrial Design (2011-2020): The Power of Cultural (2) - Responsibility. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute (Fine Arts & Design), 04, 74-81.
[4]
[4] Liu, S. M. (2022). The application and transcendence of the Basic Methods of moral Phenomenology in Marx's moral Philosophy. Marxism and Reality, 06, 94-100.
[5]
[5] Wang, X.W (2015). "Internet plus" changes the attributes of cars and production mode. Internet of Things Technology, 08.033.
[6]
[6] Chen, B., Sun, D., Zhou, J., Wong, W., & Ding, Z. (2020). A future intelligent traffic system with mixed autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles. Information Sciences, 529, 59-72.
[7]
[7] Thomson, J. J. (1984). The trolley problem. Yale LJ, 94, 1395.
[8]
[8] Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2015). Autonomous vehicles need experimental ethics: are we ready for utilitarian cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03346, 12.
[9]
[9] Fleetwood, J. (2017). Public health, ethics, and autonomous vehicles. American journal of public health, 107(4), 532-537.
[10]
[10] Laurel, B. (2018). Design Research: Methods and Perspectives (Chen H. Y., Trans.). Jiangsu Phoenix Fine Arts Publishing House, 235-236.
[11]
[11] Cai, M. Y., & Wang, W. L. (2023). Review of Interaction Design in Automotive Intelligent Cockpit. Packaging Engineering, 44(6), 430-440.
[12]
[12] Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
[13]
[13] Nash Jr, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 36(1), 48-49.
[14]
[14] Borel, E. (1921). La théorie du jeu et les équations intégralesa noyau symétrique. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 173(1304-1308), 58.
[15]
[15] Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior Princeton. Princeton University Press.
[16]
[16] Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1954). A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. American political science review, 48(3), 787-792.
[17]
[17] Gao, J. W., & Niu, X. F. (2019). Coase, The Problem of Social Cost. Economic Science Press.
[18]
[18] Norman, D. A. (2015). Design Psychology 4 Future Design (Xiao K., Trans.). CITIC Press.
[19]
[19] Fang, J. J., Li, A. D., & Luan, L. C. (2020). The Contemporary Visual Design Value of Letterpress Printing Technology. Design, 202, 35(21), 97-99.
[20]
[20] Papanek, V. J. (2020). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change (Zhou B., Trans.). Beijing Daily Press.
[21]
[21] Yang, Z. (2012). Ethical Research on Product Design [Dissertation]. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
[22]
[22] Burnett, H. S. (2009). Understanding the precautionary principle and its threat to human welfare. Social Philosophy and Policy, 26(2), 378-410.
[23]
[23] Mitcham, C. (2022). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CHCHI '23: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI
November 2023
634 pages
ISBN:9798400716454
DOI:10.1145/3629606
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 February 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Design ethics
  2. Ethical responsibility
  3. Intelligent cockpit
  4. Technological philosophy
  5. Visual interaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHCHI 2023
CHCHI 2023: Chinese CHI 2023
November 13 - 16, 2023
Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 40 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 55
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)54
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media