skip to main content
10.1145/3629606.3629649acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User Demand Analysis of User-centered Automotive Cockpit Context Components

Published:27 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

The perception technology of intelligent cockpit promotes the development of context-based technology, and reasonable analysis and application of context components can better benefit users by applying technology to products. This study focuses on drivers in the intelligent cockpit of automobiles, analyzes driving context and user demand, and proposes cockpit context segmentation and context components under modern perception technology. From the perspectives of researchers and users, the relationship between context components and the analysis results of user research are generated through focus group and questionnaire methods. The entropy method, which reflects objective weighting, is used to determine the weight vector of the indicators. It is found that among the major components of driving contexts, the weight of vehicle status (23.51%) is the highest, while the weight of vehicle attributes (3.38%) is the lowest. This article takes the intelligent cockpit as the starting point, and provides a theoretical and technical practical basis for users' driving experience through context construction and components analysis.

References

  1. Zheng, J. (2021). Three sets of keywords for intelligent cockpits. Automotive Observation, 10, 58-61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., & Weber, M. (2015). Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 11-18). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Schieben, A., Temme, G., Köster, F., & Flemisch, F. (2011). How to interact with a highly automated vehicle. In Generic interaction design schemes and test results of a usability assessment (pp. 251-267). DLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng, Y., Sun, R., Wang, H., (2021). Current development and future trends of intelligent car cabins. Automotive Practical Technology, 46(17), 201-206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pan, F. Y. (2018). Research on the design of in-car shared music system based on requirement analysis. [Doctoral dissertation, China Academy of Art].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Karim, M. M., Li, Y., Qin, R., (2021). A system of vision sensor based deep neural networks for complex driving context analysis in support of crash risk assessment and prevention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Halilaj, L., Dindorkar, I., Lüttin, J., (2021). A Knowledge Graph-based Approach for Situation Comprehension in Driving Contexts. In 18th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo, Z., Huang, Y., Hu, X., (2021). A Survey on Deep Learning Based Approaches for Context Understanding in Autonomous Driving. Electronics, 10(4), 471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The Experience Economy. Harvard Business Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang, T., Weng, K. N., Deng, Y., Yang, M., & Zhang, Y. J. (2020). User profile modeling of niche domain users based on web browsing behavior. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 40(03), 641-652.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang, Z., Feng, X. N., & Qian, T. Y. (2020). User profile method based on multimodal fusion technology. Journal of Peking University (Natural Science Edition), 56(01), 105-111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Musto, C., Polignano, M., Semeraro, G., de Gemmis, M., & Lops, P. (2020). Myrror: a platform for holistic user modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research, 30(3), 477-511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Eiband, M., Schneider, H., Bilandzic, M., Fazekas-Con, J., Haug, M., & Hussmann, H. (2018). Bringing Transparency Design into Practice. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Exploration of automotive contextual design. [Online]. Retrieved from https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/53814332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Frees, S. (2010). Context-driven interaction in immersive virtual environments. Virtual reality, 14(4), 277-290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2010). "This is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases". BIS Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). "Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research". Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). "Survey Research Methods". Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CHCHI '23: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI
    November 2023
    634 pages
    ISBN:9798400716454
    DOI:10.1145/3629606

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate17of40submissions,43%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format