skip to main content
10.1145/3630970.3631078acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crowdsourcing in the prioritization of accessibility and usability criteria for autism

Published:06 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects individuals’ communication, social interaction and personal interests. The use of digital resources (games, websites, apps, etc.) in conjunction with therapies and interventions has become an alternative for improving the quality of life of people with autism. However, the lack of information on the design, implementation and effectiveness of these resources hinders their development and evaluation, impacting on their usability. In this context, guidelines can help in the development and evaluation of the quality and suitability of these digital resources, but the application of these guidelines is challenging due to the completeness scope and quantity of guidelines available. Considering the above scenario, the following research question arises: how can the application of such recommendations be made feasible in a pragmatic scenario? To answer this question, the following hypothesis is considered: making the content more flexible, identifying the most important recommendations for specific contexts through an anonymous opinion poll. In light of the above, this study presents the results of an empirical crowdsourcing study with the aim of establishing different levels of importance for a subset of recommendations from AutismGuide, a document of usability recommendations guidelines for digital resources aimed at people with ASD, based on different contexts of use. Through a collaborative web system, 148 contributions were collected from contributors with diverse profiles: software engineers, user interface designers, professionals who work with people with ASD (doctors, pedagogues, etc.), relatives of people with ASD, among others. The results indicate the greater importance of certain criteria in certain contexts of use, and also the greater effectiveness of this methodology compared to previous methodologies for obtaining the level of importance of each criterion.

References

  1. Yuska Paola Costa Aguiar, Douglas V de A. Cardins, Juliana de AG Saraiva, Tiago Maritan, and Juliana Aragão de Araújo. 2022. Towards accessibility for users with autism: a comparative analysis of guidelines. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aguiar, Yuska Paola Costa e Galy, Edith e Godde, Anaïs e Trémaud, Maëla e Tardif, Carole. 2020. AutismGuide: a usability guidelines to design software solutions for users with autism spectrum disorder. Behaviour & Information Technology (2020), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed Alshehri, Malcolm Rutter, and Sally Smith. 2019. Assessing the Relative Importance of an E-Learning System’s Usability Design Characteristics Based on Students’ Preferences.European Journal of Educational Research 8, 3 (2019), 839–855.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association 2014. DSM-5: Manual diagnóstico e estatístico de transtornos mentais. Artmed Editora.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Peter Börjesson, Wolmet Barendregt, Eva Eriksson, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. Designing technology for and with developmentally diverse children: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children. 79–88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Britto, Talita Cristina Pagani and Pizzolato, Ednaldo Brigante. 2018. GAIA: uma proposta de um guia de recomendações de acessibilidade de interfaces Web com foco em aspectos do Autismo. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação 26, 02 (2018), 102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Consórcio World Wide Web (W3C). [n. d.]. Cognitive and learning disabilities accessibility task force (COGA TF) of the AG WG and APA WG. https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/ Disponível em: <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/>. Acesso em 26 de abril de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yuska Paola Costa, Anaïs Godde, Maëla Trémaud, Taciana Pontual, Thomas Arciszewski, Carole Tardif, and Edith Marie Galy. 2022. A survey on accessibility guidelines for users with autism: A broad understanding of the relevance and completeness. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Google LLC. [n. d.]. Waze. https://www.waze.com/es-419/company Disponível em: <https://www.waze.com/es-419/company>. Acesso em 8 de maio de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Google LLC. 2010. Angular: The modern web developer’s platform. https://angular.io/ Disponível em: <https://angular.io/>. Acesso em 10 de abril de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Google LLC. 2015. Angular Material UI Component Library. https://material.angular.io Disponível em: <https://material.angular.io>. Acesso em 10 de abril de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Juan Pablo Hourcade, Stacy R Williams, Ellen A Miller, Kelsey E Huebner, and Lucas J Liang. 2013. Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3197–3206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Muhammad Nazrul Islam, Muimmah Kabir, Jakia Sultana, Chowdhury Nawrin Ferdous, Afsana Zaman, Ummey Habiba Bristy, Priyanka Kundu Moumi, and Iffat Tamanna. 2018. Autism Sohayika: a web portal to provide services to autistic children. In International Conference on Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems. Springer, 181–192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ami Klin. 2006. Autismo e síndrome de Asperger: uma visão geral. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry 28 (2006), s3–s11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Di Liu, Randolph G Bias, Matthew Lease, and Rebecca Kuipers. 2012. Crowdsourcing for usability testing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49, 1 (2012), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Laura Malinverni, Joan Mora-Guiard, Vanesa Padillo, Lilia Valero, Amaia Hervás, and Narcis Pares. 2017. An inclusive design approach for developing video games for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 535–549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ke Mao, Licia Capra, Mark Harman, and Yue Jia. 2017. A survey of the use of crowdsourcing in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software 126 (2017), 57–84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. MongoDB. 2022. MongoDB: A Plataforma De Aplicação de Dados. https://www.mongodb.com/pt-br Disponível em: <https://www.mongodb.com/pt-br>. Acesso em 10 de maio de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jakob Nielsen. 2005. Ten usability heuristics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielsen, Jakob e Molich, Rolf. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 249–256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustavo Maciel Nunes and Yuska Paola Costa Aguiar. 2020. Emotismo: Um aplicativo para auxiliar crianças no espectro autista a reconhecer e reproduzir emoções. In Anais do xxxi simpósio brasileiro de informática na educação. SBC, 692–701.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Talita Cristina Pagani Britto Pichiliani and Ednaldo Brigante Pizzolato. 2021. Cognitive disabilities and web accessibility: a survey into the Brazilian web development community. Journal on Interactive Systems 12, 1 (2021), 308–327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Putnam, Cynthia and Chong, Lorna. 2008. Software and technologies designed for people with autism: what do users want?. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Aubyn C Stahmer, Laura Schreibman, and Allison B Cunningham. 2011. Toward a technology of treatment individualization for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain research 1380 (2011), 229–239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Virnes, Marjo e Kärnä, Eija e Vellonen, Virpi. 2015. Review of research on children with autism spectrum disorder and the use of technology. Journal of Special Education Technology 30, 1 (2015), 13–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wikipedia Foundation Inc. [n. d.]. Wikipedia: a enciclopédia livre. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Disponível em: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page>. Acesso em 8 de maio de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanan Makki Zakari, Minhua Ma, and David Simmons. 2014. A review of serious games for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In International conference on serious games development and applications. Springer, 93–106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yuxiang Zhao and Qinghua Zhu. 2014. Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction. Information systems frontiers 16 (2014), 417–434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crowdsourcing in the prioritization of accessibility and usability criteria for autism

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              CLIHC '23: Proceedings of the XI Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
              October 2023
              247 pages
              ISBN:9798400716577
              DOI:10.1145/3630970

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 6 January 2024

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format