Wei Dong
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Differential privacy has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its potential in offering robust privacy protection for individual data during analysis. With the increasing volume of sensitive information being collected by organizations and analyzed through SQL queries, the development of a general-purpose query engine that is capable of supporting a broad range of queries while maintaining differential privacy has become the holy grail in privacypreserving query release. Towards this goal, this article surveys recent advances in query evaluation under differential privacy.
- M. Abadi, A. Chu, I. Goodfellow, H. B. McMahan, I. Mironov, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang. Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pages 308--318, 2016.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of databases, volume 8. Addison-Wesley Reading, 1995.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Abo Khamis, H. Q. Ngo, X. Nguyen, D. Olteanu, and M. Schleich. In-database learning with sparse tensors. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 325--340, 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Abo Khamis, H. Q. Ngo, and A. Rudra. Faq: questions asked frequently. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 13--28, 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Amin, A. Kulesza, A. Munoz, and S. Vassilvtiskii. Bounding user contributions: A bias-variance trade-off in differential privacy. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 263--271. PMLR, 2019.Google Scholar
- G. Andrew, O. Thakkar, H. B. McMahan, and S. Ramaswamy. Differentially private learning with adaptive clipping. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03871, 2019.Google Scholar
- M. Arapinis, D. Figueira, and M. Gaboardi. Sensitivity of counting queries. In International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP), 2016.Google Scholar
- H. Asi and J. C. Duchi. Instance-optimality in differential privacy via approximate inverse sensitivity mechanisms. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 2020.Google Scholar
- N. Bakibayev, T. Kocisk'y, D. Olteanu, and J. Z´avodn'y. Aggregation and ordering in factorised databases. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 6(14), 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Blocki, A. Blum, A. Datta, and O. Sheffet. Differentially private data analysis of social networks via restricted sensitivity. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 87--96, 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Bun and T. Steinke. Concentrated differential privacy: Simplifications, extensions, and lower bounds. In Theory of Cryptography Conference, pages 635--658. Springer, 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Cai, X. Xiao, and G. Cormode. Privlava: synthesizing relational data with foreign keys under differential privacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 1(2):1--25, 2023.Google ScholarDigital Library
- T.-H. H. Chan, E. Shi, and D. Song. Private and continual release of statistics. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Chen and S. Zhou. Recursive mechanism: towards node differential privacy and unrestricted joins. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 653--664, 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Dick, C. Dwork, M. Kearns, T. Liu, A. Roth, G. Vietri, and Z. S. Wu. Confidence-ranked reconstruction of census microdata from published statistics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(8):e2218605120, 2023.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Dong, J. Fang, K. Yi, Y. Tao, and A. Machanavajjhala. R2T: Instance-optimal truncation for differentially privatequery evaluation with foreign keys. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2022.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Dong, Q. Luo, and K. Yi. Continual observation under user-level differential privacy. In 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 2190--2207. IEEE Computer Society, 2023.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Dong, D. Sun, and K. Yi. Better than composition: How to answer multiple relational queries under differential privacy. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2023.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Dong and K. Yi. Residual sensitivity for deferentially private multi-way joins. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2021.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Dong and K. Yi. A nearly instance-optimal differentially private mechanism for conjunctive queries. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, 2022.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Dong and K. Yi. Universal private estimators. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 195--206, 2023.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Dwork, M. Naor, T. Pitassi, and G. N. Rothblum. Differential privacy under continual observation. In Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 715--724, 2010.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Dwork, M. Naor, O. Reingold, G. N. Rothblum, and S. Vadhan. On the complexity of differentially private data release: efficient algorithms and hardness results. In Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 381--390, 2009.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Dwork and A. Roth. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3--4):211--407, 2014.Google Scholar
- J. Fang, W. Dong, and K. Yi. Shifted inverse: A general mechanism for monotonic functions under user differential privacy. 2022.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Huang, Y. Liang, and K. Yi. Instance-optimal mean estimation under differential privacy. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.Google Scholar
- M. R. Joglekar, R. Puttagunta, and C. R´e. Ajar: Aggregations and joins over annotated relations. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 91--106, 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Johnson, J. P. Near, and D. Song. Towards practical differential privacy for sql queries. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 11(5):526--539, 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Kamath, J. Li, V. Singhal, and J. Ullman. Privately learning high-dimensional distributions. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference on Learning Theory, COLT '19, pages 1853--1902, 2019.Google Scholar
- V. Karwa, S. Raskhodnikova, A. Smith, and G. Yaroslavtsev. Private analysis of graph structure. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 4(11):1146--1157, 2011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. P. Kasiviswanathan, K. Nissim, S. Raskhodnikova, and A. Smith. Analyzing graphs with node differential privacy. In Theory of Cryptography Conference, pages 457--476. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. A. Khamis, H. Q. Ngo, X. Nguyen, D. Olteanu, and M. Schleich. Learning models over relational data using sparse tensors and functional dependencies. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 45(2):1--66, 2020.Google Scholar
- D. Kifer and A. Machanavajjhala. No free lunch in data privacy. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, pages 193--204, 2011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Kotsogiannis, Y. Tao, X. He, M. Fanaeepour, A. Machanavajjhala, M. Hay, and G. Miklau. Privatesql: a differentially private sql query engine. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 12(11):1371--1384, 2019.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Kumar, M. Boehm, and J. Yang. Data management in machine learning: Challenges, techniques, and systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data, pages 1717--1722, 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. D. McSherry. Privacy integrated queries: an extensible platform for privacy-preserving data analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, pages 19--30, 2009.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Narayan and A. Haeberlen. Djoin: Differentially private join queries over distributed databases. In USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pages 149--162, 2012.Google Scholar
- M. Nikolic, H. Zhang, A. Kara, and D. Olteanu. F-ivm: learning over fast-evolving relational data. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 2773--2776, 2020.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Nissim, S. Raskhodnikova, and A. Smith. Smooth sensitivity and sampling in private data analysis. In Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 75--84, 2007.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Olteanu and J. Z´avodn'y. Size bounds for factorised representations of query results. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 40(1):1--44, 2015.Google Scholar
- C. Palamidessi and M. Stronati. Differential privacy for relational algebra: Improving the sensitivity bounds via constraint systems. In QAPL, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Proserpio, S. Goldberg, and F. McSherry. Calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 7(8), 2014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Regulation. General data protection regulation. Intouch, 25:1--5, 2018.Google Scholar
- M. Schleich, D. Olteanu, and R. Ciucanu. Learning linear regression models over factorized joins. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data, pages 3--18, 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Tao, X. He, A. Machanavajjhala, and S. Roy. Computing local sensitivities of counting queries with joins. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 479--494, 2020.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Vadhan. The complexity of differential privacy. In Tutorials on the Foundations of Cryptography, pages 347--450. Springer, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Zhang, G. Cormode, C. M. Procopiuc, D. Srivastava, and X. Xiao. Private release of graph statistics using ladder functions. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pages 731--745, 2015.Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Sensitive Disclosures under Differential Privacy Guarantees
BIGDATACONGRESS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Congress on Big DataNon-independent reasoning (NIR) refers to learning the information of one record from other records, under the assumption that these records share the same underlying distribution. Accurate NIR could disclose private information of an individual. An ...
Anonymizing Query Logs by Differential Privacy
SIGIR '16: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalQuery logs are valuable resources for Information Retrieval (IR) research. However, because they are also rich in private and personal information, the huge concern of leaking user privacy prevents query logs from being shared from the search companies ...
Comments