skip to main content
10.1145/3631991.3631999acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

LLMs in Design Thinking: Autoethnographic Insights and Design Implications

Published:26 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article presents an autoethnographic exploration of the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of design thinking. Through personal narratives and reflections, the author examines his experiences integrating LLMs as tools to support and enhance the design thinking process. The article discusses the benefits, challenges, and transformative potential of ChatGPT and Google Bard in facilitating ideation, prototyping, and user-centered design. Drawing on personal anecdotes and observations, the author offers insights into the impact of LLMs on idea generation, problem-solving, and collaboration within the design thinking framework. This autoethnographic approach provides a unique perspective on the integration of LLMs in design thinking, shedding light on their potentials as tools for innovation and fostering the insights of their implications for design practitioners and UX researchers. These insights were also used to develop design implications for designing interactions for LLMs, including the concept of Dynamic LLM Enabled Documents.

References

  1. Hughes, A. (2023). ChatGPT: Everything you need to know about OpenAI's GPT-4 tool. BBC Science Focus. https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/gpt-3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sawtell-Rickson, J. (2023). Data Analysis Made Easy: Using LLMs to Automate Tedious Tasks. Towards Datascience. https://towardsdatascience.com/data-analysis-made-easy-using-llms-to-automate-tedious-tasks-bdc1fee552d5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wolniak, R. (2017). The Design Thinking method and its stages. Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji, 6(6), 247–255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zamfirescu-Pereira, J., Wong, R. Y., Hartmann, B., & Yang, Q. (2023). Why Johnny can't prompt: How non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jasper, M. A. (2005). Using reflective writing within research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10(3), 247–260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Munro, A. J. (2011). Autoethnography as a research method in design research at universities. 20/20 Design Vision, 156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rapp, A. (2018). Autoethnography in human-computer interaction: Theory and practice. New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2-Methodologies, 25–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. O'Kane, A. A., Rogers, Y., & Blandford, A. E. (2014). Gaining empathy for non-routine mobile device use through autoethnography. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 987–990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eberle, B. (1996). Scamper on: Games for imagination development. Prufrock Press Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., & Kowitz, B. (2016). Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Poikolainen Rosén, A., Normark, M., & Wiberg, M. (2022). Towards more-than-human-centred design: Learning from gardening. International Journal of Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, W.-W., Giaccardi, E., Chen, L.-L., & Liang, R.-H. (2017). “ Interview with Things” A First-thing Perspective to Understand the Scooter's Everyday Socio-material Network in Taiwan. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 1001–1012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Amir Reza Asadi. 2021. Cognitive Ledger Project: Towards Building Personal Digital Twins Through Cognitive Blockchain. 2021 2nd International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (IISEC), IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IISEC54230.2021.9672433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. LLMs in Design Thinking: Autoethnographic Insights and Design Implications
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WSSE '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering
      September 2023
      352 pages
      ISBN:9798400708053
      DOI:10.1145/3631991

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)117
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format