skip to main content
10.1145/3631991.3632001acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Conversational AI to Service Organizational Agility and Flexibility: The Dynamic Capability and Option View

Published:26 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence has been changing our lives with the evolution of the times. Although human wisdom brings convenience, the use of conversational artificial intelligence by organizations will expand the scope of their operations. This will give the organization sufficient resources to reduce operating costs and time. On the other hand, conversational artificial intelligence is one of the important dynamic capabilities of organizations and will also allow organizations to respond quickly to market needs. This study examines usage, resilience, and agility in conversational AI. Based on the experience of 132 organizational information personnel, this study used questionnaires, surveys, and statistical analysis. The results show that conversational AI use is related to organizational agility. This dynamic capability will be related to organizational resilience. In conversational artificial intelligence, dynamic capabilities theory can be applied. High organizational resilience will allow organizations to respond quickly to needs when using conversational artificial intelligence. In practical applications, when organizations use conversational AI, they need to consider the breadth of resources generated and use it as an option to make contributions.

References

  1. Chen, A. P. S. (2020). B2B marketing crafts intelligence commerce: How a Chatbot is designed for the Taiwan agriculture service. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 10(2), 114-124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chen, A. P. S., & Liu, C. W. (2021). Intelligent commerce facilitates education technology: the platform and chatbot for the Taiwan agriculture service. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 11(1), 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dewi, C., Chen, A. P. S., & Christanto, H. J. (2023). Recognizing Similar Musical Instruments with YOLO Models. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Knackstedt, M. (2022). Limitations and advantages of voice bots in customer service-using the example of a contact center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Po Shun Chen, A., & Wu Liu, C. (2021, November). Crafting ASR and Conversational Models for an Agriculture Chatbot. In Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems (pp. 61-66).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 237-263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Saeed, M. A., Jiao, Y., Zahid, M. M., Tabassum, H., & Nauman, S. (2021). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: the roles of innovation, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 600-624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Yousaf, Z., & Majid, A. (2018). Organizational network and strategic business performance: does organizational flexibility and entrepreneurial orientation really matter?. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 268-285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility: The moderating effect of organizational flexibility. Management Decision, 57(8), 2092-2112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012). Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of operations management, 30(6), 467-480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rathnayaka, P., Mills, N., Burnett, D., De Silva, D., Alahakoon, D., & Gray, R. (2022). A mental health chatbot with cognitive skills for personalized behavioural activation and remote health monitoring. Sensors, 22(10), 3653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. He, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, X., Wu, B., Zhang, S., Qian, C., & Tian, T. (2022). Mental health chatbot for young adults with depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: single-blind, three-arm randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(11), e40719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Adewumi, T., Liwicki, F., & Liwicki, M. (2022). Vector representations of idioms in conversational systems. Sci, 4(4), 37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Baehre, S., O'Dwyer, M., O'Malley, L., & Lee, N. (2022). The use of Net Promoter Score (NPS) to predict sales growth: insights from an empirical investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(1), 67-84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lee, C. W., Chen, S. H., Huruta, A. D., Dewi, C., & Chen, A. P. S. (2022). Net Transmitter of Stock Market Volatility and Safe Haven for Portfolio Investors in the Asian Dragons. Economies, 10(11), 273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sugiarto, A., Lee, C. W., Huruta, A. D., Dewi, C., & Chen, A. P. S. (2022). Predictors of Pro-Environmental Intention and Behavior: A Perspective of Stimulus–Organism–Response Theory. Sustainability, 14(23), 16047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Using Conversational AI to Service Organizational Agility and Flexibility: The Dynamic Capability and Option View

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WSSE '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering
      September 2023
      352 pages
      ISBN:9798400708053
      DOI:10.1145/3631991

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format