skip to main content
10.1145/3631991.3632018acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Blended Learning Landscape Research in Mathematics

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Blended learning has transformed and gradually superseded traditional didactic teaching and online learning. This research aimed to comprehensively explore the scholarly landscape of blended learning in the context of mathematics education. The study employed a descriptive bibliometric analysis approach and sourced its data from the Scopus database. The findings revealed a fluctuating pattern in the annual publication trends pertaining to blended learning in mathematics. Notably, publications from 2012 garnered the highest citation rates compared to other years. The United States emerged as the predominant influencer in this domain. Publications in journals related to blended learning in mathematics are mostly in Q1 rank, namely 62 journals. The research focus is divided into six areas: 1) development and design; 2) technology and design; 3) effectiveness, impact, model, and instruction; 4) skill, effect, and approach; 5) blended learning, academics performance, and attitude; 6) mathematics, blended learning environment, and university. Future researchers might use these six study areas as a guide to choose the focus of their blended learning-related studies.

References

  1. Abdullah, S. M. S. M. (2019). The effect of teaching mathematics using blended learning on achievement and development of critical thinking skills among first-grade female students of the intermediate stage. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 1142–1161. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85080119306&partnerID=40&md5=786beeafd44a330175984538ed495984Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariawan, I. P. W., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2020). Design of blended learning based on tri kaya parisudha using kelase platform in realizing hybrid-superitem learning in mathematics lessons. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13346aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Fitri, S., & Zahari, C. L. (2019). The implementation of blended learning to improve understanding of mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gavinolla, M. R., Livina, A., & Swain, S. K. (2022). State of the Research on Teacher Education and Sustainability: A Bibliometrics Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education, 7(2), 181–210. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-60249100150&partnerID=40&md5=1e0733d7a20e68d81a5d4c1c29fe5b8bGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Indrapangastuti, D., Surjono, H. D., Sugiman, & Yanto, B. E. (2021). Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Model to Improve Students Achievement of Mathematical Concepts. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.423.430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kundu, A., Bej, T., & Rice, M. (2021). Time to engage: Implementing math and literacy blended learning routines in an Indian elementary classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1201–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10306-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kusumah, Y. S., Kustiawati, D., & Herman, T. (2020). The effect of geogebra in three-dimensional geometry learning on students’ mathematical communication ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13260aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lin, Y.-W., Tseng, C.-L., & Chiang, P.-J. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mitrović, S., Božić, R., & Takači, Đ. (2022). Efficiency of blended learning of calculus content during the Covid19 crisis. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2076129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Douglas. (2009). Preferred eeporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ode Samura, A., & Darhim. (2023). Improving Mathematics Critical Thinking Skills of Junior High School Students Using Blended Learning Model (BLM) in GeoGebra Assisted Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(02), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i02.36097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Phoong, S. Y., Khek, S. L., & Phoong, S. W. (2022). The Bibliometric Analysis on Finite Mixture Model. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Quinn, D., & Aarão, J. (2020). Blended learning in first year engineering mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(5), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01160-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rahmadani, Herman, T., Dareng, S. Y., & Bakri, Z. (2020). Education for industry revolution 4.0: Using flipped classroom in mathematics learning as alternative. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education 2019, ICMScE 2019, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Rusyada, H., & Nasir, M. (2022). The Effectiveness of Post-Covid-19 Pandemic Hybrid Learning Implementation in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 1714–1723. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Samosir, C. M., & Dasari, D. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: The Effect of Math Anxiety On Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. Didaktik: Jurnal Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.33084/tunas.v8i1.4305Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Samosir, C. M., Solfitri, T., & Armis, A. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas VII A SMP PGRI Pekanbaru Tahun Pelajaran 2019/ 2020. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 3(4), 403. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v3i4.10312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Setiawan, A. A., Muhtadi, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). Blended Learning and Student Mathematics Ability in Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15249aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Topping, K. J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Trenholm, S., Peschke, J., & Chinnappan, M. (2018). A Review of Fully Online Undergraduate Mathematics Instruction through the Lens of Large Scale Research ( 2000-2015 ) Abstract This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in PRIMUS on 14 Jun 2018 , available online:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F. H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yudt, K. E., Sawyer, B. E., & Shera, S. B. (2023). Preservice elementary teachers’ mathematical achievement and attitudes: A study of blended learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09565-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Blended Learning Landscape Research in Mathematics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WSSE '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering
      September 2023
      352 pages
      ISBN:9798400708053
      DOI:10.1145/3631991

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format