skip to main content
10.1145/3631991.3632032acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design Thinking In Education Research Over The Last Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis: The Opportunities In Designing Research and Development Student Worksheets Based On The RADEC Lecture Model For Prospective Teachers

Published:26 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The phenomenon of design thinking has gained popularity in education because it is relevant to various disciplines and has become a pedagogical approach. This paper contains data from bibliometric analysis of a collection of scientific research results published from multiple reference sources from 2002 to 2023. A total of 876 articles were found in the Scopus web database and then used as the basis for bibliometric analysis. This study aims to provide an overview of design thinking education research regarding research outcomes, most popular publication sites, most involved researchers, and countries. Based on the findings obtained. The main results suggest that there has been an increasing trend in the amount of research conducted on the subject of design thinking in education over the previous twenty years. In addition, the findings point to a reorientation of the research's primary focus. Most articles on teaching design thinking topics were published in the past; however, in recent years, the significance of studies on design thinking in teaching and learning has increased. Design thinking is an innovative problem-solving approach that emphasizes user-centric design, creative ideation, and iterative prototyping. It has gained significant attention in various fields, including education. In the context of prospective teachers' training, the design of student worksheets plays a crucial role in enhancing learning experiences.

References

  1. Aflatoony, L., Wakkary, R., & Neustaedter, C. (2018). Becoming a Design Thinker: Assessing the Learning Process of Students in a Secondary Level Design Thinking Course. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., Franz, J., & Strickfaden, M. (2019). Making Pedagogic Sense of Design Thinking in the Higher Education Context. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning, 1–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hufiah, A., Afandi, A., & Wahyuni, E. S. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Domain Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Pendidikan Abad 21 Menggunakan Vosviewer. Js (Jurnal Sekolah), 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24114/js.v6i1.29841Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Li, J., Luo, H., Zhao, L., Zhu, M., Ma, L., & Liao, X. (2022). Promoting STEAM Education in Primary School through Cooperative Teaching: A Design-Based Research Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Tatminingsih, S. (2022). Implementation of Digital Literacy in Indonesia Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeiece.v4i1.894Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Lecture, Cooperative Learning and Concept Mapping: Any Differences on Critical and Creative Thinking Development. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15144aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(March), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics.” Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Liu, X. (2013a). Citation Analysis: A New Method to Enhance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(July), 1852–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), 1275–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Moed, H. F. (2009). New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: A review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-0116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jalal, S. K. (2019). Co-authorship and co-occurrences analysis using bibliometrix r-package: A case study of india and bangladesh. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66(2), 57–64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Avsec, S., & Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M. (2021). Investigating possibilities of developing self-directed learning in architecture students using design thinking. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mentzer. (2014). Team Based Engineering Design Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 25(2), 52–72. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=96340438&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Morehen, J., Wrigley, C., & Wright, N. (2014). Teaching design thinking and design led innovation to non-designers: A tertiary facilitator multidisciplinary study. 2013 IEEE-Tsinghua International Design Management Symposium: Design-Driven Business Innovation, TIDMS 2013 - Proceedings, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIDMS.2013.6981215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Matthews, J., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Design and Design Thinking in Business and Management Higher Education. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. De La Cruz, E. M., Trujillo Meza, M. A., & Andrade-Arenas, L. (2023). Mobile application to improve the learning of secondary school students. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.01.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kelley, T. R., Capobianco, B. M., & Kaluf, K. J. (2015). Concurrent think-aloud protocols to assess elementary design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9291-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kim, J., & Ryu, H. (2014). A design thinking rationality framework: Framing and solving design problems in early concept generation. Human-Computer Interaction, 29(5–6), 516–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.896706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lake, D. (2022). Design thinking community health and well-being: Creating with and for community capacities. DRS2022: Bilbao, 0–21. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Lee, H. K., & Park, J. E. (2022). Digital Responsibility Insights From a Cross-Cultural Design Thinking Workshop for Creativity. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.14063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design Thinking In Education Research Over The Last Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis: The Opportunities In Designing Research and Development Student Worksheets Based On The RADEC Lecture Model For Prospective Teachers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WSSE '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering
      September 2023
      352 pages
      ISBN:9798400708053
      DOI:10.1145/3631991

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format