skip to main content
10.1145/3631991.3632041acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Image Processing of Cultural Relics Fragments Splicing Through Hybrid Folded Mesh Simplification Algorithm

Published:26 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most of the cultural relics were broken and damaged when they were excavated. However, manual splicing has many problems, such as heavy workload, long periods, and secondary damage to cultural relics. Therefore, using the computer-aided system for 3D model virtual fragment splicing and cultural relics restoration can provide an excellent matching algorithm and fast and accurate splicing technology for restoring damaged cultural relics. The existing matching algorithms based on fragment features have some problems, such as low matching accuracy, slow convergence speed, too strict constraints, easy to cause local best matching, spending a lot of time on useless matching, and poor matching effect of clouds with low overlap ratio. The study presents the automatic matching algorithm of cultural relics fragments based on feature region division. The experiment on the fragments of G10-52 Terracotta Warrior in the Museum of the Terra Cotta Warriors, it shows that the algorithm can not only greatly reduce the size of the matching data, but also effectively improve the overlapping range of the feature areas. It is a fast and accurate algorithm for matching cultural relics pieces, especially for the pieces of the low overlap fracture surface, with good matching results.

References

  1. Ali Kheyroddin, Amirhossein Mohammadkhah, Hamed Dabiri, and Ahmad Kaviani. 2020. Experimental investigation of using mechanical splices on the cyclic performance of RC columns. In Structures, 24, p717-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Qunhui Li, Guohua Geng, and Mingquan Zhou. 2019. Pairwise matching for 3D fragment reassembly based on boundary curves and concave-convex patches. IEEE Access, 8, 6153-6161. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tingting Wang, Haiyan Guo, Bin Lyu, and Zhen Yang. 2020. Speech signal processing on graphs: Graph topology, graph frequency analysis and denoising. Chinese Journal of Electronics 29, 5, 926-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.12.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Guang-bing ZHOU, Hua-jun SONG, Yu-xing WU, and Peng REN. 2018. A Non-Feature Fast 3D Rigid-Body Image Registration Method. ACTA ELECTONICA SINICA, 46, 10,.2384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mengyi Liao, Kun Zhang, Bing Li, and Jianfang Liu. 2020. Feature Extraction Method Based on Gray Value Star-shaped Projection. Journal of Computers, 31, 5, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.3966/199115992020103105003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ming-rong REN, Juan MENG, and Pu WANG. 2021. MEMS-INS Based Indoor Pedestrian Localization Using Three-Dimensional Map Matching Algorithm. ACTA ELECTONICA SINICA 49, 1, 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mengmeng Wu, and Jianfeng Wang. 2019. Registration of point cloud data for matching crushed sand particles. Powder Technology, 347, 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. A. N. Li, T. A. N. Junxiang, L. I. U. Hua, and C. H. E. N. Changjun. 2018. Registration of TLS and LLS point cloud combining genetic algorithm with ICP. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 47,4, 528. https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chao Chuan Jia, Chuan Jiang Wang, Ting Yang, Bing Hui Fan, and Fu Gui He. 2019. A 3D point cloud filtering algorithm based on surface variation factor classification. Procedia Computer Science, 154, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.06.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Yaqian Liang, Fazhi He, and Xiantao Zeng. 2020. 3D mesh simplification with feature preservation based on whale optimization algorithm and differential evolution. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 27, 4, 417-435. https://doi.org/10.3233/ICA-200641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Rolandos Alexandros Potamias, Giorgos Bouritsas, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. 2022. Revisiting point cloud simplification: A learnable feature preserving approach. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part II, pp. 586-603. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20086-1_34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Junkun Qi, Wei Hu, and Zongming Guo. 2019. Feature preserving and uniformity-controllable point cloud simplification on graph. In 2019 IEEE International conference on multimedia and expo (ICME), 284-289. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2019.00057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chao Feng, Jin Liang, Maodong Ren, Gen Qiao, Wang Lu, and Shifan Liu. 2020. A fast hole-filling method for triangular mesh in additive repair. Applied Sciences 10, 3, 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Linyan Cui, Guolong Zhang, and Jinshen Wang. 2021. Hole repairing algorithm for 3D point cloud model of symmetrical objects grasped by the manipulator. Sensors, 21, 22, 7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yifeng Fan, Xufeng Yao, and Xiufang Xu. 2020. A robust automated surface‐matching registration method for neuronavigation. Medical physics, 47, 7, 2755-2767. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/mp.14145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Amelie Hüttner, and Jan-Frederik Mai. 2019. Simulating realistic correlation matrices for financial applications: correlation matrices with the Perron–Frobenius property. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 89, 2, 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1546861.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jesús Navarro-Moreno, Rosa María Fernández-Alcalá, José Domingo Jiménez-López, and Juan Carlos Ruiz-Molina. 2019. Widely linear estimation for multisensor quaternion systems with mixed uncertainties in the observations. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356, 5, 3115-3138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.08.031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Shi Aijun, Bai Ruilin, and Tian Qinghua. 2018. Optimized ICP method combining genetic algorithm with adaptive threshold constraints. Optical Technique, 44(1), pp.63-68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Vincent Guillemot, Derek Beaton, Arnaud Gloaguen, Tommy Löfstedt, Brian Levine, Nicolas Raymond, Arthur Tenenhaus, and Hervé Abdi. 2019. A constrained singular value decomposition method that integrates sparsity and orthogonality. PloS one, 14(3), p.e0211463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Image Processing of Cultural Relics Fragments Splicing Through Hybrid Folded Mesh Simplification Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WSSE '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th World Symposium on Software Engineering
      September 2023
      352 pages
      ISBN:9798400708053
      DOI:10.1145/3631991

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format