skip to main content
10.1145/3633637.3633645acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Ontology-enhanced Knowledge Graph Embedding Method

Published:28 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Knowledge graph embedding maps entities and relationships of the graph into low dimensional dense vectors to expresse the semantic information, meantime provides effective support for downstream tasks such as link prediction. However, the existing knowledge graph embedding methods mainly focus on the explicit structured information in the graph and rarely use the entailed rich ontological knowledge. Therefore in the paper, a method for injecting ontology information into the embedding model is proposed, ontology information including class hierarchy information and relationship attribute constraints,especially symmetry attributes are considerd. By taking ontology information as extra constraints, the loss function is further refined.the generation of training samples is optimized and the number of false negative samples is limited. Experiments on the two datasets of DBpedia15K and NELL show that the embedding model can be further optimized by injecting ontology information. Specially, the hit rate of triple prediction is 63.70% for the no-type, and for type-triples the MR and the H@10 are 13.51 and 96.59% respectively. The proposed model has better performance than the basic model, which further confirms the effectiveness of the prior knowledge of ontology in knowledge graph embedding learning.

References

  1. [1]Feng X, Liu Q, Liu X. Intelligent Question Answering System Based on Knowledge Graph[C]. IEEE, 2021: 1515-1520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]GUO Q, ZHUANG F, QIN C, et al. A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2020: 1-1. DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2020.3028705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3]Hou M, Wei R, Lu L, et al. A review of knowledge graph research and its application in the medical field[J]. Computer Research and Development, 2018, 55(12): 2585-2599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]AUER S, BIZER C, KOBILAROV G, et al. DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data[C]// Proceedings of the the International Semantic Web Conference. 2007: 722-735Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]SUCHANEK F M, KASNECI G, WEIKUM G. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 2007: 697-706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]CARLSON A, BETTERIDGE J, KISIEL B, et al. Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language Learning[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 24(1): 1306-1313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]CHEN Z, WANG Y, ZHAO B, et al. Knowledge Graph Completion: A Review[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 192435-192456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8]ROSSI A, BARBOSA D, FIRMANI D, et al. Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction: A Comparative Analysis[J]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2021, 15(2): 1-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9]LIN Y, LIU Z, SUN M, et al. Learning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion[C]//Proceedings of 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]JI S, PAN S, CAMBRIA E, et al. A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022, 33(2): 494-514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11]HAO J, CHEN M, YU W, et al. Universal Representation Learning of Knowledge Bases by Jointly Embedding Instances and Ontological Concepts[C]//Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2019: 1709-1719.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]LI Z, LIU X, WANG X, et al. TransO: a knowledge-driven representation learning method with ontology information constraints[J]. World Wide Web, 2023, 26(1): 297-319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13]D’AMATO C, QUATRARO N F, FANIZZI N. Injecting Background Knowledge into Embedding Models for Predictive Tasks on Knowledge Graphs[C]. //Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web Conference 2021: 441-457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]HITZLER P, KRÖTZSCH M, RUDOLPH S. Foundations of Semantic Web technologies[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]BORDES A, USUNIER N, GARCIA-DURAN A, et al. Translating Embeddings for Modeling Multi-relational Data[C]. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2013, 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]WANG Z, ZHANG J, FENG J, et al. Knowledge Graph Embedding by Translating on Hyperplanes[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2014, 28(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]JI G, HE S, XU L, et al. Knowledge Graph Embedding via Dynamic Mapping Matrix[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 2015: 687-696.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]WANG Y, WANG H, HE J, et al. TAGAT: Type-Aware Graph Attention neTworks for reasoning over knowledge graphs[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2021, 233: 107500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19]ROSSO P, YANG D, OSTAPUK N, et al. RETA: A Schema-Aware, End-to-End Solution for Instance Completion in Knowledge Graphs[C]//Proceedings of the Web Conference,2021: 845-856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]ZHANG W. Knowledge Graph Embedding with Diversity of Structures[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web 2017: 747-753.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]TROUILLON T, WELBL J, RIEDEL S, et al. Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Prediction[M/OL]. arXiv, 2016[2023-06-29].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]Shaojie Li, Yong Liu. Towards Sharper Generalization Bounds for Structured Prediction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]Changlong Wang,Zhiyong Feng,XiaoWang Zhang,Xin Wang, Guozheng Rao,Daoxun fu. ComR: A combined OWL reasoner for ontology classification, Frontiers of Computer Science, 2019, 13(1):139-156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Ontology-enhanced Knowledge Graph Embedding Method

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCPR '23: Proceedings of the 2023 12th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
        October 2023
        589 pages
        ISBN:9798400707988
        DOI:10.1145/3633637

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 February 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format