skip to main content
10.1145/3635059.3635092acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Towards exploiting BPMN and DMN in public service modeling

Published:14 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Modeling of Public Services (PSs) is used by a large number of public authorities worldwide to improve their quality. The resulting diagrams are useful in the case of simple PSs however they can become very complex in the case of complex PSs. To address process complexity, the integration of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) and Decision Model and Notation (DMN) has been proposed. DMN is applied to model the decision logic of a process and has proven to provide promising results in the private sector. However, the integration of BPMN and DMN has not been studied in the case of PSs. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, to investigate the integration of BPMN and DMN when applied to complex PSs. Second, to identify a set of steps and principles for integrating BPMN and DMN to model complex PSs. For this purpose, a literature review is conducted leading to the result that there is limited research on the use of BPMN to model complex PS while research on the use of DMN is missing. In addition, a PS is selected and modeled based on selected criteria and finally, a set of steps and principles is proposed.

References

  1. Chinosi, M.; Trombetta, A. BPMN: An introduction to the standard, Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2012; vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 124–134, doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2011.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Janssens, L.; Bazhenova, E.; De Smedt, J.; Vanthienen, J.; Denecker, M. Consistent integration of decision (DMN) and process (BPMN) models. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2016; 1612, 121–128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Batoulis, K.; Meyer, A.; Bazhenova, E.; Decker, G.; Weske, Μ. Extracting Decision Logic from Process Models, in Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Cham, 2015; pp. 349–366, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Promikyridis, R.; Tambouris, E. Knowledge Graphs for Public Service Description: The Case of Getting a Passport in Greece. In: Themistocleous M., Papadaki M., Kamal M.M. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 402. Springer, Cham, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Walser K.; Schaffroth M. BPM and BPMN as Integrating Concepts in eGovernment - The Swiss eGovernment BPM Ecosystem. In Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011; vol 138, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23135-3_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gabryelczyk R.; Kulesza P.; Rakowska E. Improving public sector performance by using business process modelling and measurement: a case study analysis. In Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, (102), 2018; pp.115–132. doi:10.7433/s102.2017.09Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Object Management Group. Decision Model and Notation (DMN 1.3), 2021. Available online at: https://www.omg.org/spec/DMN (accessed on 25 September 2023)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasić, F.; De Smedt, J.; Vanthienen, J. Redesigning Processes for Decision – Awareness: Strategies for Integrated Modelling. In 11th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), 2018; pp. 247-250, doi: 10.1109/QUATIC.2018.00043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Biard, T.; Le Mauff, A.; Bigand, M.; Bourey, J. P. Separation of Decision Modeling from Business Process Modeling Using New ‘Decision Model and Notation’ (DMN) for Automating Operational Decision-Making. In Risks and Resilience of Collaborative Networks, Cham, 2015; pp. 489–496. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. European Union. About CPSV. Available online: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/solution/core-public-service-vocabulary/about (accessed on 25 September 2023)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 2009; 339(7716), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ambarawati H.M., Er M., Wibowo R.P., Sonhaii A.I. Business Process Architecture, Data and Information Architecture: a Public Sector Case. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, 2022; pp. 241 – 246. Doi : 10.1109/ICACSIS56558.2022.9923493Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nascimento, A.R.D., Baldam, R.d.L., Costa, L. and Coelho Junior, T.d.P. Applications of business governance and the Unified BPM Cycle in public credit recovery activities. In the Business Process Management Journal, 2020, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 312-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0317Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Helbin, T., Van Looy, A. Process Innovation in the EU Public Sector Through the Lens of BPM Ambidexterity. 2022. In: Marrella, A., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kuhn, P.; Buchinger, M.; Balta, D. How to Redesign Government Processes for Proactive Public Services?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2021; pp.29–40. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Raczyńska, M.; Krukowski, K. Organisational Culture as a Determinant of Business Process Management in the Community Offices in Poland. Administrative Sciences, 2019; 9(4), p.96. doi:10.3390/admsci9040096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Athanasopoulos, K.; Nikoletos, G.; Georgiadis, G.; Stamelos, I.; Skolarikis, S. Process Management in the Greek Public Sector. Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, 2017; doi:10.1145/3139367.3139467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Syed, R.; Bandara, W.; French, E.; Stewart, G. Getting it right! Critical Success Factors of BPM in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 2018; 22, doi: 10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Papadopoulos, G.A.; Kechagias, E.; Legga, P.; Tatsiopoulos, I. Integrating business process management with public sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2018; pp. 405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tambouris, E.; Tavantzis, T.; Vergidis, K.; Gerontas, A.; Tarabanis, K. Integrating BPMN with DMN to model complex Public Services: The case of Getting a Transportation Card for Disabled in Greece. In 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2022), Guimaraes, Portugal, 2022; (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3560107.3560129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hevner, A.R.; March, S.T.; Park, J.; Ram, S. Design science in information systems research, MIS Q. 28 (1), 2004; 75–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Μinistry of digital governance. Available online: https://www.secdigital.gov.gr/projects/aploysteysi-diadikasion/ (accessed on 25 September 2023)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. European Union. New European Interoperability Framework. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/default/files/eif_brochure_final.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2023)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Promikyridis, R.; Tambouris, E. Using Knowledge Graphs to provide public service information. DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022; 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543585Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Patsoulis, G.; Promikyridis, R.; Tambouris, E. Integration of Chatbots with Knowledge Graphs in EGovernment: The Case of Getting a Passport. In Proceedings of the 25th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Volos, Greece, 2021; pp. 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503823.3503901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Antoniadis, P.; Tambouris, E. PassBot: A Chatbot for Providing Information on Getting a Greek Passport. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Athens, Greece, 2021; pp. 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. National process registry. Available online: https://mitos.gov.gr/index.php/%CE%94%CE%94:%CE%88%CE%BA%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%83%CE%B7_%CE%95%CE%BB%CE%BB%CE%B7%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%8D_%CE%94%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%B2%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%81%CE%AF%CE%BF%CF%85 (accessed on 25 September 2023)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards exploiting BPMN and DMN in public service modeling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PCI '23: Proceedings of the 27th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Progress in Computing and Informatics
      November 2023
      304 pages

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 February 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format