skip to main content
10.1145/3635638.3635656acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Effectiveness Study of Multi-Model Result Fusion in Satellite Image Semantic Segmentation Tasks

Published:16 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

The field of atmospheric imaging has continually grappled with the complex task of accurate contrail detection, largely due to the intricate and variable nature of contrail formations within diverse atmospheric environments. Addressing this challenge, this research introduces a pioneering computational methodology by leveraging the synergies of the EfficientNet and UNet deep learning architectures. EfficientNet, characterized by its optimized depth, width, and resolution scaling, is employed as the encoder, capturing a rich hierarchy of features with remarkable granularity. This depth of representation is crucial to delineate the subtle nuances of contrails. Following this, the UNet decoder, renowned for its symmetric expansive path that ensures pixel-wise accuracy, is tasked with the reconstruction of these segmented features, preserving spatial coherence and fine details. The ensemble of these architectures results in a robust model capable of discerning even the most nuanced contrail formations. Rigorous empirical validations were conducted, and the results affirm the model’s superior performance in contrail segmentation. The technical innovations presented in this paper not only set a new benchmark for contrail detection but also provide insights that could be pivotal for future research endeavors in atmospheric imaging using deep learning.

References

  1. Nitesh V Chawla, Kevin W Bowyer, Lawrence O Hall, and W Philip Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research 16 (2002), 321–357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20 (1995), 273–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Weinan Dai, Chengjie Mou, Jun Wu, and Xuesong Ye. 2023. Diabetic Retinopathy Detection with Enhanced Vision Transformers: The Twins-PCPVT Solution. In 2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI). IEEE, 403–407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770–778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. 2015. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning. pmlr, 448–456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael D King, Steven Platnick, W Paul Menzel, Steven A Ackerman, and Paul A Hubanks. 2013. Spatial and temporal distribution of clouds observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 51, 7 (2013), 3826–3852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hermann Mannstein and Ulrich Schumann. 2005. Aircraft induced contrail cirrus over Europe. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 14 (2005), 549–554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chengjie Mou, Weinan Dai, Xuesong Ye, and Jun Wu. 2023. Research On Method Of User Preference Analysis Based on Entity Similarity and Semantic Assessment. In 2023 8th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP). IEEE, 1029–1033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chengjie Mou, Xuesong Ye, Jun Wu, and Weinan Dai. 2023. Automated ICD Coding Based on Neural Machine Translation. In 2023 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA). IEEE, 495–500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2010. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10). 807–814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 22, 10 (2009), 1345–1359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lior Rokach. 2010. Ensemble-based classifiers. Artificial intelligence review 33 (2010), 1–39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 234–241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research 15, 1 (2014), 1929–1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carole H Sudre, Wenqi Li, Tom Vercauteren, Sebastien Ourselin, and M Jorge Cardoso. 2017. Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations. In Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: Third International Workshop, DLMIA 2017, and 7th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Québec City, QC, Canada, September 14, Proceedings 3. Springer, 240–248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 6105–6114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jun Wu, Xuesong Ye, Chengjie Mou, and Weinan Dai. 2023. Fineehr: Refine clinical note representations to improve mortality prediction. In 2023 11th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Xuesong Ye, Jun Wu, Chengjie Mou, and Weinan Dai. 2023. MedLens: Improve mortality prediction via medical signs selecting and regression interpolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11742 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yong-Qiong Zhu, Ye-Ming Cai, and Fan Zhang. 2022. Motion capture data denoising based on LSTNet autoencoder. Journal of Internet Technology 23, 1 (2022), 11–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Effectiveness Study of Multi-Model Result Fusion in Satellite Image Semantic Segmentation Tasks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MLMI '23: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Machine Intelligence
          October 2023
          196 pages
          ISBN:9798400709456
          DOI:10.1145/3635638

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 January 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format