skip to main content
research-article

Who2chat: A Social Networking System for Academic Researchers in Virtual Social Hours Enabling Coordinating, Overcoming Barriers and Social Signaling

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual academic networking is socio-technically challenging, however, fruitful for researchers' success. We introduce a system called Who2chat to tackle the challenge and facilitate connections of researchers in virtual social hours. Who2chat allows academic researchers to create a research profile and express their research interests, find researchers with similar interests, overcome social barriers, and coordinate and start video chats, all within a single interface. We engaged in an iterative design process by deploying Who2chat at academic conferences. In our preliminary deployment (N=80), we found that researchers often have difficulty finding other researchers who share similar interests, and they are shy about reaching out to other researchers. Inspired by this, we implemented social-signaling features to Who2chat and ran our first deployment (N=220). Our results highlight that the interface allowed users to find relevant researchers and helped them feel confident in joining conversations. However, this led to large group conversations where discussion topics were more superficial. In response, we developed and deployed our second interface (N=81). Key improvements were managing the size of conversations, dynamically determining and allowing individuals to join a conversation based on their relevance to the ongoing discussion, and maintaining the ratio of senior and junior members, to further enhance the quality of discussions. As a result, participants were able to meet more people and engage in more meaningful conversations. Our work demonstrates an interface design for social networking in academic settings and how to lower social barriers in virtual networking.

References

[1]
Ajay Agrawal, Avi Goldfarb, and Florenta Teodoridis. 2016. Understanding the changing structure of scientific inquiry. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8, 1 (2016), 100--128.
[2]
Andreas Andrikopoulos, Aristeidis Samitas, and Konstantinos Kostaris. 2016. Four decades of the Journal of Econometrics: Coauthorship patterns and networks. Journal of econometrics 195, 1 (2016), 23--32.
[3]
Pierre Azoulay, Joshua S Graff Zivin, and Jialan Wang. 2010. Superstar extinction. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, 2 (2010), 549--589.
[4]
Jeremy N Bailenson. 2021. Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2, 1 (2021), 1--6.
[5]
George J Borjas and Kirk B Doran. 2015. Which peers matter? The relative impacts of collaborators, colleagues, and competitors. Review of economics and statistics 97, 5 (2015), 1104--1117.
[6]
George J Borjas, Kirk B Doran, and Ying Shen. 2018. Ethnic complementarities after the opening of China how chinese graduate students affected the productivity of their advisors. Journal of Human Resources 53, 1 (2018), 1--31.
[7]
Lutz Bornmann and Richard Williams. 2017. Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data. Journal of Informetrics 11, 3 (2017), 788--799.
[8]
Scott D Bradshaw. 1998. I'll go if you will: do shy persons utilize social surrogates? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15, 5 (1998), 651--669.
[9]
Marco Caliendo and Sabine Kopeinig. 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of economic surveys 22, 1 (2008), 31--72.
[10]
Christian Catalini, Christian Fons-Rosen, and Patrick Gaule. 2016. Did cheaper flights change the direction of science? Available at SSRN 2774366 (2016).
[11]
Clowdr CIC. 2021. Midspace. https://midspace.app.
[12]
Emily IM Collins, Anna L Cox, and Frank Lee. 2016. Say Cheese! Games for Successful Academic and Student Networking. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 105--115.
[13]
Discord. 2015. Discord. https://discord.com.
[14]
Morten Esbensen, Paolo Tell, and Jakob E Bardram. 2014. SideBar: Videoconferencing system supporting social engagement. In 10th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. IEEE, 358--367.
[15]
Richard B Freeman and Wei Huang. 2015. Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic coauthorship within the United States. Journal of Labor Economics 33, S1 (2015), S289--S318.
[16]
Gather. 2021. Gathertown. https://www.gather.town/.
[17]
Donna K Ginther and Rina Na. 2021. Does mentoring increase the collaboration networks of female economists? An evaluation of the CeMENT randomized trial. In AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 111. 80--85.
[18]
Fallon R Goodman, Katharine E Daniel, Lameese Eldesouky, Bradley A Brown, and Elizabeth T Kneeland. 2021. How do people with social anxiety disorder manage daily stressors? Deconstructing emotion regulation flexibility in daily life. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 6 (2021), 100210.
[19]
Shane Greenstein, Yuan Gu, and Feng Zhu. 2016. Ideological segregation among online collaborators: evidence from Wikipedians. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[20]
Aaron Halfaker, R Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 664--688.
[21]
Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, and Loren G. Terveen. 2014. Snuggle: Designing for Efficient Socialization and Ideological Critique. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 311--320. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2556288.2557313
[22]
Lynne Henderson, Philip Zimbardo, and Bernardo Carducci. 2010. Shyness. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (2010), 1--3.
[23]
Jim Hollan and Scott Stornetta. 1992. Beyond being there. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 119--125.
[24]
Erzhen Hu, Md Aashikur Rahman Azim, and Seongkook Heo. 2022. FluidMeet: Enabling Frictionless Transitions Between In-Group, Between-Group, and Private Conversations During Virtual Breakout Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 511, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517558
[25]
Julie S. Hui, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2018. IntroAssist: A Tool to Support Writing Introductory Help Requests. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173596
[26]
Matthew J. Bietz, Nitesh Goyal, Nicole Immorlica, Blair MacIntyre, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Benjamin C. Pierce, Sean Rintel, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2022. Social Presence in Virtual Event Spaces. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1--5.
[27]
Aimée A Kane, Linda Argote, and John M Levine. 2005. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 96, 1 (2005), 56--71.
[28]
M Kaplan, Donald. 1972. On shyness. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 53 (1972), 439--453.
[29]
Victor Kaptelinin. 2023. Interaction Design Solutions for Online Meetings: A University Teacher's Wish List. Interactions 30, 2 (2023), 42--46.
[30]
Kibum Kim, John Bolton, Audrey Girouard, Jeremy Cooperstock, and Roel Vertegaal. 2012. Telehuman: effects of 3d perspective on gaze and pose estimation with a life-size cylindrical telepresence pod. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2531--2540.
[31]
Rodney Michael Kinney, Chloe Anastasiades, Russell Authur, Iz Beltagy, Jonathan Bragg, Alexandra Buraczynski, Isabel Cachola, Stefan Candra, Yoganand Chandrasekhar, Arman Cohan, Miles Crawford, Doug Downey, Jason Dunkelberger, Oren Etzioni, Rob Evans, Sergey Feldman, Joseph Gorney, David W. Graham, F.Q. Hu, Regan Huff, Daniel King, Sebastian Kohlmeier, Bailey Kuehl, Michael Langan, Daniel Lin, Haokun Liu, Kyle Lo, Jaron Lochner, Kelsey MacMillan, Tyler Murray, Christopher Newell, Smita R Rao, Shaurya Rohatgi, Paul L Sayre, Zejiang Shen, Amanpreet Singh, Luca Soldaini, Shivashankar Subramanian, A. Tanaka, Alex DWade, Linda M.Wagner, Lucy LuWang, Christopher Wilhelm, Caroline Wu, Jiangjiang Yang, Angele Zamarron, Madeleine van Zuylen, and Daniel S. Weld. 2023. The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. ArXiv abs/2301.10140 (2023). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:256194545
[32]
P Laubheimer. 2018. Beyond the NPS: Measuring Perceived Usability with the SUS, NASA-TLX, and the Single Ease Question After Tasks and Usability Tests. Nielsen Norman Group.
[33]
Elizabeth Mara Lewis. 2020. The Impact of Mindfulness Training on Post-Event Processing in Social Anxiety: A Multi-Method Investigation. (2020).
[34]
Don MacMillan. 2012. Mendeley: teaching scholarly communication and collaboration through social networking. Library Management 33, 8/9 (Oct. 2012), 561--569. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279902
[35]
Holly Mata, Teaniese P Latham, and Yusuf Ransome. 2010. Benefits of professional organization membership and participation in national conferences: Considerations for students and new professionals. Health promotion practice 11, 4 (2010), 450--453.
[36]
Julia M. Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Louise Barkhuus, Kaisa Väänänen, and Quentin Jones. 2016. Supporting Opportunities for Context-Aware Social Matching: An Experience Sampling Study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2430--2441. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858175
[37]
Joseph F McCarthy, David W McDonald, Suzanne Soroczak, David H Nguyen, and Al M Rashid. 2004. Augmenting the social space of an academic conference. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 39--48.
[38]
Jonah Meyerhoff, Tony Liu, Konrad P Kording, Lyle H Ungar, Susan M Kaiser, Chris J Karr, David C Mohr, et al. 2021. Evaluation of changes in depression, anxiety, and social anxiety using smartphone sensor features: longitudinal cohort study. Journal of medical Internet research 23, 9 (2021), e22844.
[39]
Vincent-Wayne Mitchell, Bodo B Schlegelmilch, and Sorina-Diana Mone. 2016. Why should I attend? The value of business networking events. Industrial Marketing Management 52 (2016), 100--108.
[40]
Markus Nagler, Martin Watzinger, and Kathrin Wernsdorf. 2022. ICT, Collaboration, and Innovation: Evidence from BITNET. (2022).
[41]
Larry J Nelson, Laura M Padilla-Walker, Sarah Badger, Carolyn McNamara Barry, Jason S Carroll, and Stephanie D Madsen. 2008. Associations between shyness and internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, and relationships during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 37, 5 (2008), 605--615.
[42]
Takeshi Nishida. 2018. Designing Social Interaction Support System with Shyness in Mind. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140--144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3154517
[43]
Ekaterina Olshannikova, Thomas Olsson, Jukka Huhtamäki, and Peng Yao. 2019. Scholars' Perceptions of Relevance in Bibliography-Based People Recommender System. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28, 3 (2019), 357--389.
[44]
Giulia E. Pacchioni. 2020. Virtual conferences get real. Nature Reviews Materials 5 (2020), 167 -- 168.
[45]
Mikko Packalen and Jay Bhattacharya. 2015. Age and the trying out of new ideas. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[46]
Payod Panda, Molly Jane Nicholas, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Kori Inkpen, Eyal Ofek, Ross Cutler, Ken Hinckley, and Jaron Lanier. 2022. AllTogether: Effect of Avatars in Mixed-Modality Conferencing Environments. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (Durham, NH, USA) (CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3539658
[47]
Rosalind W Picard. 2000. Affective computing. MIT press.
[48]
Jessica Pidoux, Pascale Kuntz, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2021. Declarative Variables in Online Dating: A Mixed-Method Analysis of a Mimetic-Distinctive Mechanism. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 100 (apr 2021), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449174
[49]
LLC Pine Labs. 2021. ohyay. https://ohyay.co.
[50]
Evie Powell, Felesia Stukes, Tiffany Barnes, and Heather Richter Lipford. 2011. Snag'em: Creating community connections through games. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, 591--594.
[51]
Aman Prasad, Max Shin, Ryan M. Carey, Kevin T. Chorath, Harman S Parhar, Scott M Appel, Alvaro G Moreira, and Karthik Rajasekaran. 2020. Propensity score matching in otolaryngologic literature: A systematic review and critical appraisal. PLoS ONE 15 (2020).
[52]
Jason Priem, Heather Piwowar, and Richard Orr. 2022. OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01833 (2022).
[53]
José-Alain Sahel. 2011. Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance. Science translational medicine 3, 84 (2011), 84cm13--84cm13.
[54]
Niloufar Salehi and Michael S Bernstein. 2018. Hive: Collective design through network rotation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--26.
[55]
Titus K. Schleyer, Brian S. Butler, Mei Song, and Heiko Spallek. 2012. Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction : a publication of the Association for Computing Machinery 19 1 (2012).
[56]
Donghoon Shin, Sangwon Yoon, Soomin Kim, and Joonhwan Lee. 2021. BlahBlahBot: Facilitating Conversation between Strangers Using a Chatbot with ML-Infused Personalized Topic Suggestion. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451771
[57]
Meredith M Skeels and Jonathan Grudin. 2009. When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work. 95--104.
[58]
Wally Smith, Greg Wadley, Sarah Webber, Benjamin Tag, Vassilis Kostakos, Peter Koval, and James J. Gross. 2022. Digital Emotion Regulation in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 444, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517573
[59]
Giuseppe Soda, Pier Vittorio Mannucci, and Ronald S Burt. 2021. Networks, creativity, and time: Staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation. Academy of Management Journal 64, 4 (2021), 1164--1190.
[60]
Jaeyoon Song, Christoph Riedl, and Thomas W Malone. 2021. Online Mingling: Supporting Ad Hoc, Private Conversations at Virtual Conferences. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--10.
[61]
Edward Peter Stringham. 2002. The emergence of the London stock exchange as a self-policing club. Journal of Private Enterprise 17, 2 (2002), 1--19.
[62]
Werner GK Stritzke, Anh Nguyen, and Kevin Durkin. 2004. Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology 6, 1 (2004), 1--22.
[63]
Loren Terveen and David W. McDonald. 2005. Social Matching: A Framework and Research Agenda. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 3 (sep 2005), 401--434. https://doi.org/10.1145/1096737.1096740
[64]
Gustavo F Tondello, Rina R Wehbe, Samantha N Stahlke, Amanda Leo, Rylan Koroluk, and Lennart E Nacke. 2015. CHI PLAYGUE: A Networking Game of Emergent Sociality. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer- Human Interaction in Play. 791--794.
[65]
Kun Tu, Bruno Ribeiro, David Jensen, Don Towsley, Benyuan Liu, Hua Jiang, and XiaodongWang. 2014. Online Dating Recommendations: Matching Markets and Learning Preferences. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (Seoul, Korea) (WWW '14 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 787--792. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2579240
[66]
Moshe Y. Vardi. 2023. ACM for the Public Good. Commun. ACM 66, 5 (apr 2023), 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589609
[67]
Roel Vertegaal, Ivo Weevers, Changuk Sohn, and Chris Cheung. 2003. Gaze-2: conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 521--528.
[68]
Gordon Walker, Bruce Kogut, and Weijian Shan. 1997. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization science 8, 2 (1997), 109--125.
[69]
Jayne Wallace, John McCarthy, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Making Design Probes Work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3441--3450. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473
[70]
Kuansan Wang, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh-Han Wu, Yuxiao Dong, and Anshul Kanakia. 2020. Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies 1, 1 (2020), 396--413.
[71]
Jessica R Winder. 2020. Shyness Mindset and Sexual Harassment Responses among Female College Students. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northern Illinois University.
[72]
Xuhai Xu, Tianyuan Zou, Han Xiao, Yanzhang Li, Ruolin Wang, Tianyi Yuan, Yuntao Wang, Yuanchun Shi, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind K Dey. 2022. TypeOut: Leveraging Just-in-Time Self-Affirmation for Smartphone Overuse Reduction. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 442, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3491102.3517476
[73]
Chelsie M Young, Mai-Ly N Steers, Faith Shank, Alexcia Aris, and Paige Ryan. 2021. Shyness and susceptibility to social influence: Stronger concordance between norms and drinking among shy individuals. Addictive behaviors 119 (2021), 106922.
[74]
Zhiwen Yu and Yuichi Nakamura. 2010. Smart Meeting Systems: A Survey of State-of-the-Art and Open Issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 42, 2, Article 8 (mar 2010), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1667062.1667065
[75]
Amy X Zhang, Anant Bhardwaj, and David Karger. 2016. Confer: A conference recommendation and meetup tool. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. 118--121.
[76]
Philip G Zimbardo, Paul Pilkonis, and Robert Norwood. 1977. The Silent Prison of Shyness. Technical Report. STANFORD UNIV CA DEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY.
[77]
Douglas Zytko, Victor Regalado, Nicholas Furlo, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2020. Supporting Women in Online Dating with a Messaging Interface That Improves Their Face-to-Face Meeting Decisions. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 137 (oct 2020), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415208

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Face-to-face or face-to-screen: A quantitative comparison of conferences modalitiesPNAS Nexus10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae522Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024

Index Terms

  1. Who2chat: A Social Networking System for Academic Researchers in Virtual Social Hours Enabling Coordinating, Overcoming Barriers and Social Signaling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    April 2024
    6294 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3661497
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2024
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. knowledge sharing
    2. networking
    3. shyness
    4. social matching
    5. tools for researchers

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)141
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Face-to-face or face-to-screen: A quantitative comparison of conferences modalitiesPNAS Nexus10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae522Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media