skip to main content
10.1145/3637494.3638732acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescecctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Dynamic Printing Equipment Production Status Anomaly Detection Model

Published: 05 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In the digital transformation of the printing industry, monitoring the equipment status during the printing production process is the key task. Researchers establish equipment anomaly detection models on historical and real-time data collected from sensors. However, in the actual production process, the data from equipment lacks clear status labels. Manually labeling the status of each time point is a challenge, it makes supervised learning methods difficult to apply. Unsupervised methods are proposed to automatically detect anomalies. But current methods are sensitive to noise and highly depend on data quality. In the realistic scenario, the timestamp intervals are uneven, and the insufficient sensor precision may produce uncorrected speed data. In response to the above issues, this article proposes a new unsupervised dynamic printing equipment production status anomaly detection model, which combined autoencoder and Gaussian model. The model, considering complexity in real scenes, is composed of three components: window feature extraction, anomaly scores measurement and confidence calculation. Compared with traditional anomaly detection using Kmeans with fixed window features, our model improves the classification accuracy of normal samples in real printed data from 90% to 93%.

References

[1]
Young-Mok Bae. 2023. Detecting abnormal behavior of automatic test equipment using autoencoder with event log data. Computers & Industrial Engineering (Aug. 2023), 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.
[2]
Andrew Charles Connelly. 2023. Autoencoder and Incremental Clustering-Enabled Anomaly Detection. Electronics (April 2023), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12091970
[3]
He. 2019. Temporal convolutional networks for anomaly detection in time series. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing (April 2019), 1213(4): 042050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1213/4/042050
[4]
Hu. 2023. Exploration of Digital Transformation in Newspaper Printing. Printing Technology (Jan. 2023), 1.
[5]
Jia. 2023. K-means based feature reduction for network anomaly detection. Tsinghua Univ(Sci&Technol) (Aug. 2023), 4. https://doi.org/10.3404/j.issn.1672 – 7649.2023.16.036
[6]
H Leung Karimipour. 2020. Relaxation-based anomaly detection in cyber-physical systems using ensemble kalman filter. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications (Oct. 2020), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2019.0031
[7]
AN Papadopoulos K Tsichlas Y Manolopoulos Kontaki, A Gounaris. 2011. Continuous monitoring of distance-based outliers over data streams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) (May 2011), 12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2011. 5767923
[8]
S Singh Markou. 2003. Novelty detection: a review―part 1: statistical approaches. Signal Processing: The Official Publication of the European Association for Signal Processing (EURASIP) (Sept. 2003), 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2003.07.018.
[9]
Pang. 2022. Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Review. ACM computing surveys (March 2022), 36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439950
[10]
Papenbrock T Schmidl S, Wenig P. 2022. Anomaly detection in time series: a comprehensive evaluation. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (May 2022), 17. https://doi.org/10.14778/3538598.3538602
[11]
Onizuka M Shiokawa H, Fujiwara Y. 2015. SCAN++: efficient algorithm for finding clusters, hubs and outliers on large-scale graphs. Very Large Data Bases.VLDB Endowment (July 2015), 12. https://doi.org/10.14778/2809974.2809980
[12]
Song. 2015. SCREEN: Stream Data Cleaning under Speed Constraints. ACM, 2015 (May 2015), 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723372.2723730
[13]
Arindam Banerjee Varun Chandola and Vipin Kumar. 2022. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. Comput. Surveys (May 2022), 58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
[14]
Wang. 2011. A HMM-based method for anomaly detection. 2011 4th IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network and Multimedia Technology (Feb. 2011), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBNMT.2011.6155940
[15]
Xu. 2023. Detection of abnormal data in ship communication network based on K-means clustering. Ship science and technology (Jan. 2023), 4.
[16]
Yang. 2020. Unsupervised Feature Learning for Online Voltage Stability Evaluation and Monitoring Based on Variational Autoencoder. Elsevier,2020 (March 2020), 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSR
[17]
Yin. 2018. Time series cleaning under variance constraints. Database Systems for Advanced Applications (Jan. 2018), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91455-8_6
[18]
Zhou. 2023. New Trends in Digital Transformation of China’s Manufacturing Industry. China industry&information technology (June 2023), 7. https://doi.org/10.19609/j.cnki.cn10-1299/f.2023.06.010

Index Terms

  1. A Dynamic Printing Equipment Production Status Anomaly Detection Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CECCT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Communication Technology
    November 2023
    266 pages
    ISBN:9798400716300
    DOI:10.1145/3637494
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 February 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Anomaly Detection
    2. Print Equipment Status
    3. Unsupervised Learning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • project of philosophy and social science planning of Guangzhou
    • MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences

    Conference

    CECCT 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 18
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media