skip to main content
10.1145/3637882.3637883acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods for Gait Analysis of Potential Guide Dogs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gait analysis is important for guide dog organizations, as ideal guide dogs have a smooth and efficient gait, where they can also easily shift between and maintain various gaits. Gait quality and natural traveling speed are two of the multiple factors important in matching a guide dog to its visually impaired handler. Gait evaluation typically includes subjective visual observation of the dog or objective assessments obtained from special-designed equipment. Guide dog organizations need a method to easily collect and analyze objective data of gait information. In this work, we explored how various machine learning models could learn and analyze gait patterns from inertial measurements data that were collected during two different data collection experiments using a wearable sensor device. We also evaluated how well each machine learning model could generalize behavior patterns from various dogs under different environments. Additionally, we compared how sensor placement locations could affect gait prediction performance by attaching the sensor device to the dog’s neck and back area respectively. The tested machine learning models were able to classify different gaits in the range of 42% to 91% in terms of accuracy, and predict various gait parameters with an error rate ranging from 14% to 29% depending on the setup. Furthermore, we also observed that using behavior data collected from the neck region contains more movement information than the back area. By performing a cross-dataset generalization test on the machine learning models, we found that even with performance drop, the models were able to learn gait-specific behavior patterns that are generalizable for different dogs. Although the results were preliminary, the proposed gait analysis exploration still showed promising potential for studying behavior patterns of candidate guide dogs.

References

  1. Satyabrata Aich, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Jong-Seong Sim, Dong-Jin Jang, and Hee-Cheol Kim. 2019. The Design of an Automated System for the Analysis of the Activity and Emotional Patterns of Dogs with Wearable Sensors Using Machine Learning. Applied Sciences 9, 22 (2019), 4938. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224938Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2016. Layer Normalization. arxiv:1607.06450 [stat.ML]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rita Brugarolas, Robert T. Loftin, Pu Yang, David L. Roberts, Barbara Sherman, and Alper Bozkurt. 2013. Behavior recognition based on machine learning algorithms for a wireless canine machine interface. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2013.6575505Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rita Brugarolas, David Roberts, Barbara Sherman, and Alper Bozkurt. 2012. Posture estimation for a canine machine interface based training system. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 4489–4492. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346964Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Rita Brugarolas, David Roberts, Barbara Sherman, and Alper Bozkurt. 2013. Machine learning based posture estimation for a wireless canine machine interface. In 2013 IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems. 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/BioWireleSS.2013.6613658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Frances L. Chen, Madeline Zimmermann, Jessica P. Hekman, Kathryn A. Lord, Brittney Logan, Jane Russenberger, Eldin A. Leighton, and Elinor K. Karlsson. 2021. Advancing Genetic Selection and Behavioral Genomics of Working Dogs Through Collaborative Science. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.662429Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Zach Cleghern, Evan Williams, Sean Mealin, Marc Foster, Timothy Holder, Alper Bozkurt, and David L. Roberts. 2020. An IoT and Analytics Platform for Characterizing Adolescent Dogs’ Suitability for Guide Work. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Haifa, Israel) (ACI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371049.3371056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zach Cleghern, Evan Williams, Sean Mealin, Marc Foster, Timothy Holder, Alper Bozkurt, and David L. Roberts. 2021. Behavioral and Environmental Analytics from Potential Guide Dogs with IoT Sensor Data Informed by Expert Insight. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446002.3446121Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stephen Cunnane. 2017. Stephen Cunnane art and animation. Retrieved Aug. 5, 2023 from https://www.stephencunnane.com/3d-workGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fi. 2017. THE SMARTEST TECH EVER BUILT FOR YOUR DOG. Retrieved Aug. 12, 2023 from https://tryfi.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. FitBark. 2013. FitBark GPS 2nd Generation. Retrieved Aug. 12, 2023 from https://www.fitbark.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Linda Gerencsér, Gábor Vásárhelyi, Máté Nagy, Tamas Vicsek, and Adam Miklósi. 2013. Identification of Behaviour in Freely Moving Dogs (Canis familiaris) Using Inertial Sensors. PLOS ONE 8, 10 (10 2013), null. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077814Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gregory J Jenkins, Chady H Hakim, N Nora Yang, Gang Yao, and Dongsheng Duan. 2018. Automatic characterization of stride parameters in canines with a single wearable inertial sensor. PLoS One 13, 6 (June 2018), e0198893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sean Mealin, Marc Foster, Zach Cleghern, Alper Bozkurt, and David L. Roberts. 2021. Using Inertial Measurement Unit Data for Objective Evaluations of Potential Guide Dogs. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446002.3446064Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fanny Menuge, Míriam Marcet-Rius, Muriel Jochem, Orane François, Camille Assali, Camille Chabaud, Eva Teruel, Justine Guillemot, and Patrick Pageat. 2021. Early evaluation of fearfulness in future guide dogs for blind people. Animals (Basel) 11, 2 (Feb. 2021), 412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alejandra Mondino, Michael Khan, Beth Case, Sara Giovagnoli, Andrea Thomson, B Duncan X Lascelles, Margaret Gruen, and Natasha Olby. 2023. Activity patterns are associated with fractional lifespan, memory, and gait speed in aged dogs. Sci. Rep. 13, 1 (Feb. 2023), 2588.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. PetPace. 2012. Welcome to the Future of Pet Healthcare. Retrieved Aug. 12, 2023 from https://petpace.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. scikit learn. 2013. Supervised learning. Retrieved Jun. 5, 2023 from https://scikit-learn.org/stable/supervised_learning.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. IBM Watson Studio. 2010. IBM Watson Studio. Retrieved Jun. 6, 2023 from https://www.ibm.com/cloud/watson-studioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tekscan. 2018. Tekscan Strideway Gait Anlysis System Data Sheet for Animals. Retrieved Aug. 10, 2022 from https://camatsystem.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/MDL_Strideway-Data-Sheet-ANIMAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tekscan. 2018. Tekscan Strideway System. Retrieved Jul. 28, 2022 from https://www.tekscan.com/products-solutions/systems/strideway-systemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Giancarlo Valentin, Joelle Alcaidinho, Ayanna Howard, Melody M. Jackson, and Thad Starner. 2015. Towards a Canine-Human Communication System Based on Head Gestures. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Iskandar, Malaysia) (ACE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 65, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Giancarlo Valentin, Joelle Alcaidinho, Ayanna Howard, Melody M. Jackson, and Thad Starner. 2016. Creating Collar-Sensed Motion Gestures for Dog-Human Communication in Service Applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Heidelberg, Germany) (ISWC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971763.2971788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. arxiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Whistle. 2013. The new way to help pets stay healthy, happy, and safe. Retrieved Aug. 12, 2023 from https://www.whistle.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Evan Williams, Zach Cleghern, Marc Foster, Timothy Holder, David Roberts, and Alper Bozkurt. 2020. A Smart Collar for Assessment of Activity Levels and Environmental Conditions for Guide Dogs *, Vol. 2020. 4628–4631. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175814Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Yifan Wu, Timothy Holder, Marc Foster, Evan Williams, Masataka Enomoto, B. Duncan Lascelles, Alper Bozkurt, and David Roberts. 2023. Spatial and Temporal Analytic Pipeline for Evaluation of Potential Guide Dogs Using Location and Behavior Data. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom) (ACI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565995.3566033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Xiqiao Zhang, Gregory J Jenkins, Chady H Hakim, Dongsheng Duan, and Gang Yao. 2022. Four-limb wireless IMU sensor system for automatic gait detection in canines. Sci. Rep. 12, 1 (March 2022), 4788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods for Gait Analysis of Potential Guide Dogs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACI '23: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction
      December 2023
      180 pages
      ISBN:9798400716560
      DOI:10.1145/3637882

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 February 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format