Advancing Cattle Health Monitoring through ACI-Driven Wearable Sensor Technology: A Case Study of Leg-Worn System Development
Article No.: 9, Pages 1 - 13
Abstract
Wearable technologies hold promise for revolutionizing disease management in the cattle farming industry by enabling real-time monitoring of cattle health through continuous physiological and behavioral data collection. However, the practical implementation of these technologies, along with approaches to have a paramount consideration of animal welfare and farmer needs during the process, remain underexplored. This study adopts animal-computer interaction (ACI) principles to address these gaps, with a focus on harmonizing technological advancements with on-ground realities. The paper details the design process of a leg-worn sensor-based system for cattle health monitoring, covering hardware and software facets from ideation to implementation. The contributions of this study extend to both the ACI field and the broader livestock industry. By embracing ACI principles, we showcase the potential of wearable sensor technology to transform cattle health monitoring. The developed leg-worn system exemplifies the integration of ACI-driven design with practical farm management needs, offering a model for the advancement of livestock health and management practices.
References
[1]
Barkema, H. W., von Keyserlingk, M. A., Kastelic, J. P., Lam, T. J., Luby, C., Roy, J. P., ... & Kelton, D. F. (2015). Invited review: Changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare. Journal of dairy science, 98(11), 7426-7445.
[2]
Garcia, R., Aguilar, J., Toro, M., Pinto, A., & Rodriguez, P. (2020). A systematic literature review on the use of machine learning in precision livestock farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 179, 105826.
[3]
Neethirajan, S. Recent advances in wearable sensors for animal health management. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 12 (2017), 15–29.
[4]
Rutten, C., Velthuis, A., Steeneveld, W., and Hogeveen, H. Invited review: Sensors to support health management on dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 4 (2013), 1928–1952.
[5]
Lee, M., & Seo, S. (2021). Wearable wireless biosensor technology for monitoring cattle: A review. Animals, 11(10), 2779.
[6]
Zamansky, A., Sinitca, A., van der Linden, D., & Kaplun, D. (2021). Automatic animal behavior analysis: opportunities for combining knowledge representation with machine learning. Procedia Computer Science, 186, 661-668.
[7]
Makinde, A., Islam, M. M., & Scott, S. D. (2019, November). Opportunities for ACI in PLF: applying animal-and user-centred design to precision livestock farming. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-6).
[8]
Qiao, Y., Kong, H., Clark, C., Lomax, S., Su, D., Eiffert, S., & Sukkarieh, S. (2021). Intelligent perception-based cattle lameness detection and behaviour recognition: A review. Animals, 11(11), 3033.
[9]
Benaissa, S., Tuyttens, F. A., Plets, D., Cattrysse, H., Martens, L., Vandaele, L., ... & Sonck, B. (2019). Classification of ingestive-related cow behaviours using RumiWatch halter and neck-mounted accelerometers. Applied animal behaviour science, 211, 9-16.
[10]
Shen, W., Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., Wei, X., & Sun, J. (2020). Rumination recognition method of dairy cows based on the change of noseband pressure. Information Processing in Agriculture, 7(4), 479-490.
[11]
Grinter, L. N., Campler, M. R., & Costa, J. H. C. (2019). Validation of a behavior-monitoring collar's precision and accuracy to measure rumination, feeding, and resting time of lactating dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 102(4), 3487-3494.
[12]
Zambelis, A., Wolfe, T., & Vasseur, E. (2019). Validation of an ear-tag accelerometer to identify feeding and activity behaviors of tiestall-housed dairy cattle. Journal of dairy science, 102(5), 4536-4540.
[13]
Aquilani, C., Confessore, A., Bozzi, R., Sirtori, F., & Pugliese, C. (2022). Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems. Animal, 16(1), 100429.
[14]
Neethirajan, S. Recent advances in wearable sensors for animal health management. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 12 (2017), 15–29.
[15]
Duncan, E. (2018). An exploration of how the relationship between farmers and retailers influences precision agriculture adoption (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph).
[16]
Paci, P., Mancini, C., & Nuseibeh, B. (2022). The case for animal privacy in the design of technologically supported environments. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 1611.
[17]
Duncan, E. (2018). An exploration of how the relationship between farmers and retailers influences precision agriculture adoption (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph).
[18]
Hostiou, N., Fagon, J., Chauvat, S., Turlot, A., Kling, F., Boivin, X., & Allain, C. (2017). Impact of precision livestock farming on work and human-animal interactions on dairy farms. A review. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 21, 1-8.
[19]
Pavlovic, D., Davison, C., Hamilton, A., Marko, O., Atkinson, R., Michie, C., ... & Tachtatzis, C. (2021). Classification of cattle behaviours using neck-mounted accelerometer-equipped collars and convolutional neural networks. Sensors, 21(12), 4050.
[20]
Benaissa, S., Tuyttens, F. A., Plets, D., Cattrysse, H., Martens, L., Vandaele, L., ... & Sonck, B. (2019). Classification of ingestive-related cow behaviours using RumiWatch halter and neck-mounted accelerometers. Applied animal behaviour science, 211, 9-16.
[21]
Abdiansah, A., & Wardoyo, R. (2015). Time complexity analysis of support vector machines (SVM) in LibSVM. International journal computer and application, 128(3), 28-34.
[22]
Vázquez Diosdado, J. A., Barker, Z. E., Hodges, H. R., Amory, J. R., Croft, D. P., Bell, N. J., & Codling, E. A. (2015). Classification of behaviour in housed dairy cows using an accelerometer-based activity monitoring system. Animal Biotelemetry, 3(1), 1-14.
[23]
Berckmans, D. (2022). Advances in precision livestock farming. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing.
[24]
Hartung, J., Banhazi, T., Vranken, E., & Guarino, M. (2017). European farmers' experiences with precision livestock farming systems. Animal Frontiers, 7(1), 38-44.
[25]
Alipio, M., & Villena, M. L. (2022). Intelligent wearable devices and biosensors for monitoring cattle health conditions: A review and classification. Smart Health, 100369.
[26]
Mancini, C. (2017). Towards an animal-centred ethics for Animal–Computer Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 221-233.
[27]
Westerlaken, M., & Gualeni, S. (2016, November). Becoming with: towards the inclusion of animals as participants in design processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-10).
[28]
Mancini, C. (2011). Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. interactions, 18(4), 69-73.
[29]
Webber, S., Cobb, M. L., & Coe, J. (2022). Welfare through competence: a framework for animal-centric technology design. Frontiers in veterinary science, 741.
[30]
Paci, P., Mancini, C., & Price, B. A. (2020, July). Understanding the interaction between animals and wearables: The wearer experience of cats. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 1701-1712).
[31]
Abrego-Ulloa, E. R., Aguilar-Lazcano, C. A., Pérez-Espinosa, H., Rodríguez-Vizzuett, L., Hernández-Luquin, M. F., Espinosa-Curiel, I. E., & Escalante, H. J. (2022, December). Towards a monitoring and emergency alarm system activated by the barking of assistant dogs. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-10).
[32]
Ricardo Nathaniel Holder, T., Williams, E., Martin, D., Kligerman, A., Summers, E., Cleghern, Z., ... & Bozkurt, A. (2021, November). From Ideation to Deployment: A Narrative Case Study of Citizen Science Supported Wearables for Raising Guide Dogs. In Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-13).
[33]
Lawson, S., Kirman, B., Linehan, C., Feltwell, T., & Hopkins, L. (2015, April). Problematising upstream technology through speculative design: the case of quantified cats and dogs. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2663-2672).
[34]
Kleinberger, R., Cunha, J., Vemuri, M. M., & Hirskyj-Douglas, I. (2023, April). Birds of a Feather Video-Flock Together: Design and Evaluation of an Agency-Based Parrot-to-Parrot Video-Calling System for Interspecies Ethical Enrichment. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16).
[35]
Kleinberger, R., Vemuri, M., Sands, J., Sareen, H., & Baker, J. (2022, December). TamagoPhone: A Framework for Augmenting Artificial Incubators to Enable Vocal Interaction Between Bird Parents and Eggs. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-7).
[36]
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Kankaanpää, V. (2021). Exploring how white-faced sakis control digital visual enrichment systems. Animals, 11(2), 557.
[37]
Kleinberger, R., Harrington, A. H., Yu, L., Van Troyer, A., Su, D., Baker, J. M., & Miller, G. (2020, April). Interspecies interactions mediated by technology: An avian case study at the zoo. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).
[38]
French, F., Mancini, C., & Sharp, H. (2017, November). Exploring research through design in animal computer interaction. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-12).
[39]
Rychen, J., Semoroz, J., Eckerle, A., Hahnloser, R. H., & Kleinberger, R. (2022). Full-duplex acoustic interaction system for cognitive experiments with cetaceans. bioRxiv, 2022-05.
[40]
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Piitulainen, R., & Lucero, A. (2021). Forming the Dog Internet: Prototyping a Dog-to-Human Video Call Device. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact., 5(ISS), 1-20.
[41]
Karl, S., Boch, M., Zamansky, A., van der Linden, D., Wagner, I. C., Völter, C. J., ... & Huber, L. (2020). Exploring the dog–human relationship by combining fMRI, eye-tracking and behavioural measures. Scientific reports, 10(1), 22273.
[42]
Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Bauer, M., & Martin, R. (1998, October). Design for wearability. In digest of papers. Second international symposium on wearable computers (cat. No. 98EX215) (pp. 116-122). IEEE.
[43]
Chambers, R. D., & Yoder, N. C. (2020). FilterNet: A many-to-many deep learning architecture for time series classification. Sensors, 20(9), 2498.
[44]
Valentin, G., Alcaidinho, J., Howard, A., Jackson, M. M., & Starner, T. (2016, September). Creating collar-sensed motion gestures for dog-human communication in service applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 100-107).
[45]
Gleerup, K. B., Forkman, B., Otten, N. D., Munksgaard, L., & Andersen, P. H. (2017). Identifying pain behaviors in dairy cattle. WCDS Adv Dairy Technol, 29, 231-239.
Index Terms
- Advancing Cattle Health Monitoring through ACI-Driven Wearable Sensor Technology: A Case Study of Leg-Worn System Development
Recommendations
IoT-Based Cow Health Monitoring System
Computational Science – ICCS 2020AbstractGood health and wellbeing of animals are essential to dairy cow farms and sustainable production of milk. Unfortunately, day-to-day monitoring of animals condition is difficult, especially in large farms where employees do not have enough time to ...
Cattle Care: An IoT Cattle Health Monitoring System (CHMS) for Backyard Dairy Cattle Farmers
CCIOT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Internet of ThingsCattle health monitoring is not unusual in today's time, there are techniques or practices used to monitor their health conditions consistently to maintain wellness to be able to produce as much milk as they can. Unfortunately, it is laborious and time-...
Development of sound-based poultry health monitoring tool for automated sneeze detection
Highlights- Monitor bioacoustics to detect respiratory problems.
- Algorithm to detect ...
AbstractRespiratory diseases are a major health challenge in meat chicken production. As sneezing is a clinical sign of many respiratory diseases, sound has a great potential in monitoring these diseases. This study focussed on the development ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2023
180 pages
ISBN:9798400716560
DOI:10.1145/3637882
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 February 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Jiangsu Province Key Research and Development Program
- Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program
Conference
ACI '23
ACI '23: The Tenth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction
December 4 - 8, 2023
NC, Raleigh, USA
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 59Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)54
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format