skip to main content
10.1145/3637989.3638017acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile Self-learning and Level-up System in Metaverse Space - Taking the Knowledge of Reproduction Number in the Pandemic as an Example

Published: 29 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In computer-based dialogue learning, students' willingness to communicate and ability to interact is one of the important factors. Few studies have examined the testing of mobile metaverse teaching material systems built for interactive communication and learning courses. This study developed and designed course content for a virtual classroom, which is suitable for mobile learning on Android or iOS systems, and can provide metaverse space for students to discuss homework using their mobile phones, as well as a system for online self-learning and testing. Students can participate in classes without time or space restrictions. In addition, questions related to life math knowledge and leveling up are included, such as the basic reproduction number of COVID-19, influenza, and enterovirus. There were 91 valid responses from two schools, which recognized the convenience and benefit of the virtual digital technology of the mobile self-learning system in the metaverse space as an auxiliary tool for learning, as it provides a more flexible and diversified educational learning mode. This system can be used for course teaching, after-class review, and testing to facilitate self-testing of learning results.

References

[1]
Lina Dias and Angelin Victor. 2022. Teaching and learning with mobile devices in the 21st century digital world: Benefits and challenges. Eur. J. Multidiscip. Studi. 7, 1 (January – June 2022), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p339-344
[2]
Mostafa Al-Emran, Vitaliy Mezhuyev, and Adzhar Kamaludin. 2018. Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. 125, (October 2018), 389-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
[3]
Mosiforeba Victoria Adegbija and Olaniyi Oladimeji Bola. 2015. Perception of undergraduates on the adoption of mobile technologies for learning in selected universities in Kwara state, Nigeria. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, (February 2015), 352-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.482
[4]
Sandy Schuck, Matthew Kearney, and Kevin Burden. 2017. Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technol. Pedagog. Inf. 26, 2 (2017), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1230555
[5]
Mustafa Güler, Suphi Önder Bütüner, Şahin Danişman,and Kadir Gürsoy. 2022. A Meta-analysis of the impact of mobile learning on mathematics achievement. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27, 2 (August 2021), 1725-1745.
[6]
Eun-Ok Baek and Qi Guo. 2019. Instructional design principles for mobile learning. In Yu (Aimee) Zhang & Dean Cristol (Eds.) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning, pp.1-22.
[7]
Fang-Chi Tseng. 2021. Challenge of distance learning- how to cope with the impact of changing learning patterns under the influence of the epidemic? Taiwan Educ. Rev. Mon. 10, 9, 145-152.
[8]
Ford Lumban Gaol and Ekaterina Prasolova-Førland. 2022. Special section editorial: The frontiers of augmented and mixed reality in all levels of education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27, 1, 611-623.
[9]
Stella Timotheou, Ourania Miliou, Yiannis Dimitriadis, Sara Villagrá Sobrino, Nikoleta Giannoutsou, Romina Cachia, Alejandra Martínez Monés, and Andri Ioannou. 2023. Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 6, 6695-6726.
[10]
Chin-Nien Chou, Shi-Jung Chiu, Chia-Ru Lee, and Yi-Shan Huang, Y. 2021. Survey on new life in the epidemic prevention under level 3 alert- learning and parent-child part. Taiwan Trend Res. 1-11.
[11]
Chuanmei Dong, Simin Cao, and Hui Li. 2020. Young children's online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 118, 11540 (November 2020), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
[12]
Irina-Virginia Drăgulănescu, Gabriela Țigu, Narcisa Valter, and Mihaela Cornelia Sandu. 2022. Online Teaching – Analysis and solutions instrumented by quality engineering methods. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences, 579-588.
[13]
Surasak Srisawat and Pallop Piriyasurawong. 2022. Metaverse Virtual learning management based on gamification techniques model to enhance total experience. Int. Educ. Stud. 15, 5, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v15n5p153
[14]
Patinya Weruwanaruk, Issara Kanjung, Weerachai Sarakorn, and Nutthakarn Moeikao. 2023. The designing framework for flipped learning environment on metaverse to enhance mathematical conceptual understanding for seven grade students. IIAI Let. Inst. Res. 3, 1 (2023), 1-8.
[15]
Roy Malcolm Anderson and Robert Mccredie May. 1981. The population-dynamics of micro-parasites and their invertebrate hosts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 291, 1054 (April 1981), 451–524.
[16]
David R. M. Smith, Audrey Duval, Koen B. Pouwels, Didier Guillemot, Jérôme Fernandes, Bich-Tram Huynh, Laura Temime, and Lulla Opatowski on behalf of the AP-HP/Universities/Inserm COVID-19 research collaboration. 2020. Optimizing COVID-19 surveillance in long-term care facilities: A modelling study. BMC Med. 18, 386. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01866-6.
[17]
George Shirreff, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Simon Cauchemez, Laura Temime, Lulla Opatowski, and EMEA-MESuRS Working Group on the Nosocomial Modelling of SARS-CoV-22. 2022. Measuring basic reproduction number to assess effects of nonpharmaceutical interventions on nosocomial SARS-coV-2 transmission. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 28, 7 (July 2022), 1345-1354.
[18]
Roy M Anderson, Hans Heesterbeek, Don Klinkenberg, and T Déirdre Hollingsworth. 2020. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet. 395, 10228 (March 2020), 931–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5
[19]
O. Diekmann, J. A. P. Heesterbeek, and J. A. J. Metz. 1990. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J. Math. Biol. 28, (June 1990), 365–382.
[20]
J A P Heesterbee. 2002. A brief history of R0 and a recipe for its calculation. Acta Biotheor. 50, 3 (2002), 189–204.
[21]
Marco D'Arienzo and Angela Coniglio. 2020. Assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 basic reproduction number, R0, based on the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Biosaf. Health. 2, 2 (June 2020), 57-59.
[22]
Isabella Locatelli, Bastien Trächsel, and Valentin Rousson. 2021. Estimating the basic reproduction number for COVID-19 in Western Europe. PLoS One 16, 3 (March 2021), e0248731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248731
[23]
Yousef Alimohamadi, Maryam Taghdir, and Mojtaba Sepandi. 2020. Estimate of the basic reproduction number for COVID-19: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 53, 3 (May 2020), 151–157.
[24]
Clotilde El Guerche-Séblain, Lina Chakir, Gopinath Nageshwaran, Rebecca C. Harris, Caroline Sevoz-Couche, Olivier Vitoux, and Philippe Vanhems. 2021. Experience from five Asia-Pacific countries during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and epidemiology outcomes. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 44, (November–December 2021), 102171.

Index Terms

  1. Mobile Self-learning and Level-up System in Metaverse Space - Taking the Knowledge of Reproduction Number in the Pandemic as an Example

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEEL '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Education and E-Learning
    November 2023
    220 pages
    ISBN:9798400708732
    DOI:10.1145/3637989
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 May 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Metaverse space
    2. life math
    3. mobile learning
    4. online test
    5. self-learning system

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEEL 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 9
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media