skip to main content
10.1145/3638067.3638095acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inclusion of deaf people in industry: Lessons learned from the usability evaluation of AppTalk

Published:24 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accessibility for deaf people, especially in the workplace, is a continuous process that requires the active participation of deaf users and constant search for improvements. Knowing their needs and experiences is a key point to ensuring that digital systems and applications are truly inclusive. In this context, the AppTalk was developed, which is an application whose objective is to make the transmission of information more accessible in the manufacturing environment of the company Dell Technologies, through the communication in Libras between a 3D avatar and the deaf user. This paper describes part of the development of the AppTalk current version for web and also its usability evaluation, using the System Usability Scale (SUS) in conjunction with a usability test. To ensure the effectiveness of the system, the team adopted user-centered approaches and involved deaf people and Libras interpreters in all phases of the project. User research were conducted to understand the needs and preferences of Dell’s deaf employees, taking into account factors such as communication, interaction and accessibility. This paper is an experience report that highlights the challenges and lessons learned from the usability test and the application of SUS as methods of AppTalk usability evaluation. The results obtained can serve as a basis for future improvements and research related to the development of accessible technologies for people with hearing impairment.

References

  1. Patricia Aspilicueta. 2006. Modelo de Análise de Erros Aplicado à Produção Escrita de Surdos: O Estudo das Preposições no Português como Segunda Língua. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem 9, 1 (jul. 2006), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.5433/2237-4876.2006v9n1p11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. J. Usability Studies 4, 3 (may 2009), 114–123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Barbosa and B. Silva. 2010. Interação Humano-Computador. Elsevier Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Benyon. 2019. Designing Interactive Systems: A Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design (fourth ed.). Pearson (Intl).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. World Wide Web Consortium-W3C. 2023. This is how you cite a website in latex. http://World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/copyright/document-license-2023/”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Renato Kimura Da Silva. 2014. ProDeaf: Metodologia de Tradução de Português para Libras por Meio de Avatares 3D: Uma Abordagem Multidisciplinar. Revista FORUM29/30 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Manuel Martínez Gutiérrez, José Rafael Rojano Cáceres, and Jaime Muñoz-Arteaga. 2022. Accessibility evaluation for deaf users an approach. In 2022 International Conference on Inclusive Technologies and Education (CONTIE). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTIE56301.2022.10004409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Holanda.S. 2023. O PROCESSO DE PRODUÇÃO DE UM ASSISTENTE VIRTUAL PARA O PÚBLICO FALANTE DE LIBRAS. Especialização. Universidade Federal do Ceará, fortaleza.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Matt Huenerfauth, Kasmira Patel, and Larwan Berke. 2017. Design and Psychometric Evaluation of an American Sign Language Translation of the System Usability Scale. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rie Kamikubo, Lining Wang, Crystal Marte, Amnah Mahmood, and Hernisa Kacorri. 2022. Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysis. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Athens, Greece) (ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. World Health Organization and World Bank. 2011. World report on disability 2011., Summary also available in Braille pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jerry Schnepp and Brent Shiver. 2011. Improving Deaf Accessibility in Remote Usability Testing. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Dundee, Scotland, UK) (ASSETS ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andrew Sears and Vicki Hanson. 2011. Representing Users in Accessibility Research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2235–2238. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hayley Stokar and John Orwat. 2018. Hearing Managers of Deaf Workers: A Phenomenological Investigation in the Restaurant Industry. American Annals of the Deaf 163, 1 (2018), 13–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26476312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ascom Uece. 2021. Com Parceria da UECE, Dell Conquista Prêmio internacional. https://www.ceara.gov.br/2021/04/29/com-parceria-da-uece-dell-conquista-premio-internacional/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dell USA. 2021. Dell Technologies 2021 Diversity ‘I&’ Inclusion Report. https://www.dell.com/en-us/dt/corporate/social-impact/esg-resources/reports.htm?hve=view+resources#tab0=1&pdf-overlay=//www.delltechnologies.com/asset/en-us/solutions/business-solutions/briefs-summaries/delltechnologies-2021-diversity-and-inclusion-report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Inclusion of deaf people in industry: Lessons learned from the usability evaluation of AppTalk

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHC '23: Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          October 2023
          791 pages
          ISBN:9798400717154
          DOI:10.1145/3638067

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 January 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format