Ecivaldo De Souza Matos
ABSTRACT
Codesign is an approach that seeks the active participation of all stakeholders, including end users, valuing their contributions and considering their needs and experiences. However, a common challenge in codesign is the issue of alterity, which involves awareness and consideration of differences among people. Alterity is crucial to ensure the inclusion and relevance of design solutions for all involved parties. One of the problems related to alterity in codesign is the marginalization or lack of adequate representation of certain voices. This can lead to solutions that do not meet the needs of all users. It is essential to address this issue by including different perspectives, active listening, and consideration of the needs of diverse groups, aiming for alterity and accessibility throughout the design process. This paper presents examples of how alterity can or cannot manifest in interaction codesign processes, even when equitable participation is prompted and encouraged. As a methodology, we will use the Semio-Participatory Interaction Design Process (SPIDe) as a codesign process in two different implementations.
- Manuella Marianna Andrade. 2015. Dois procedimentos e um objeto: observação direta e experimento artificial na investigação em projeto. (2015).Google Scholar
- Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas, Maria Cecília Martins, and José Armando Valente. 2013. Codesign de Redes Digitais: tecnologia e educação a serviço da inclusão social. Penso Editora.Google Scholar
- Alan Cooper, Robert Reimann, and David Cronin. 2007. About face 3: the essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heloisa Vieira Da Rocha and Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas. 2003. Design e avaliação de interfaces humano-computador. Unicamp.Google Scholar
- Clarisse Sieckenius De Souza. 2005. The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. MIT press.Google Scholar
- Frans de Waal. 2010. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society: Harmony Books, New York, 2009, 304 pp.Google Scholar
- Maurice Friedman. 2001. Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas: An Ethical Query. Philosophy Today 45, 1 (2001), 3.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Audrei Gesser. 2009. LIBRAS? que língua é essa: crenças e preconceitos em torno da língua de sinais e da realidade surda. Parábola.Google Scholar
- Elaine Hatfield, Richard L Rapson, and Yen-Chi L Le. 2011. Emotional contagion and empathy. The social neuroscience of empathy. (2011), 19.Google Scholar
- Maddy Janssens and Chris Steyaert. 2001. From diversity management to alterity politics: Qualifying otherness. HRM Network NL ‘Organizational Renewal: Challenging Human Resource Management 15 (2001).Google Scholar
- Jessica Korte, Leigh Ellen Potter, and Sue Nielsen. 2015. An experience in requirements prototyping with young deaf children. Journal of Usability Studies 10, 4 (2015), 195–214.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J Löwgren. 2013. Interaction Design-brief intro, website, 2nd edn, Interaction Design Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ecivaldo de Souza Matos. 2013. Dialética da Interação Humano-Computador: tratamento didático do diálogo midiatizado. Ph. D. Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
- Michael J Muller, Jean Hallewell Haslwanter, and Tom Dayton. 1997. Participatory practices in the software lifecycle. In Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, 255–297.Google Scholar
- Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.Google Scholar
- Gabriel L Pita, Diego Zabot, Jean Rosa, and Ecivaldo Matos. 2017. Adapting the SPIDe to include visually impaired users in interaction design. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leigh Ellen Potter, Jessica Korte, and Sue Nielsen. 2014. Design with the Deaf: Do Deaf children need their own approach when designing technology?. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children. 249–252.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jenny Preece, Yvonne Rogers, Helen Sharp, David Benyon, Simon Holland, and Tom Carey. 1994. Human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.Google Scholar
- Jean CS Rosa and Ecivaldo Matos. 2016. Semio-participatory framework for interaction design of educational software. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean CS Rosa, Beatriz B do Rêgo, Filipe A Garrido, Pedro D Valente, Nuno J Nunes, and Ecivaldo Matos. 2020. Interaction design and requirements elicitation integrated through SPIDe: a feasibility study. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean CS Rosa, Pedro D Valente, Leonardo Costa, Nuno J Nunes, and Ecivaldo de Souza Matos. 2021. Guidelines for braindraw conduction: looking at braindraw under the lens of abduction and semiotics. Behaviour & Information Technology 40, 10 (2021), 1035–1054.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean Clemisson Santos Rosa. 2017. Design de interaçao multicultural: um framework semioparticipativo para o (re) design da interaçao de softwares educacionais. Master’s thesis. Departamento de Computação. Instituto de Matemática. UFBA.Google Scholar
- Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5–18.Google Scholar
- Luciano Augusto Toledo and Guilherme de Farias Shiaishi. 2009. Estudo de caso em pesquisas exploratórias qualitativas: um ensaio para a proposta de protocolo do estudo de caso. Revista da FAE 12, 1 (2009).Google Scholar
- Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Magnus C Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, and Anders Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert K Yin. 2015. Estudo de Caso-: Planejamento e métodos. Bookman editora.Google Scholar
- Diego Zabot. 2019. (SPIDeKids:) Adapting an Interaction Codesign Process for Deaf or Hard of Hearing Children Participation. Master’s thesis. Departamento de Computação. Instituto de Matemática. UFBA.Google Scholar
- Diego Zabot, Saulo Andrade, and Ecivaldo Matos. 2019. Game Design participativo com crianças surdas e com deficiência auditiva: uma experiência no ensino fundamental. In Anais do I Workshop sobre Interação e Pesquisa de Usuários no Desenvolvimento de Jogos. SBC, 49–58.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards alterity in interaction codesign
Recommendations
Alterity and freedom of information on the internet: the loss of net neutrality in contemporary literature
Special Issue on EthicompGiving a short overview of the technical innovation of Deep Packet Inspection and "Internet fast-lanes", this paper shows the ethical dimension of giving up the founding principle of the open Internet. These new means of network management are fiercely ...
Towards an animal-centred ethics for Animal-Computer Interaction
The emerging discipline of Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI) aims to take what in Interaction Design is known as a user-centred approach to the design of technology intended for animals, placing them at the centre of the design process as stakeholders, ...
Comments