skip to main content
10.1145/3638067.3638130acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital Resources suiting people on the Autism Spectrum: usability criteria prioritization through crowdsourcing

Published:24 January 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects communication, social interaction, and personal interests in diverse manners on different individuals, requiring tailored therapies and interventions to address the specific needs of each affected person. Digital resources like websites and mobile apps have emerged as popular options to enhance the quality of life for individuals with ASD, and may provide or fit the necessary personalized adaptations for each user. However, limited information exists on the integration and effectiveness of these resources, leading to potential issues with usability, quality, and ergonomics. Moreover, the lack of consensus on usability criteria importance and relevance further complicates the development of digital solutions for this population. This study presents the results of an empiric crowdsourcing study that aimed to establish the relevance and importance of software usability and accessibility guidelines for individuals with ASD. Through a web application, data was collected from contributors with diverse profiles, who prioritized guidelines based on their significance according to each contributor knowledge and opinions. This work discusses the findings from 148 valid contributions collected from anonymous users with different profiles.

References

  1. Yuska Paola Costa Aguiar, Douglas V de A. Cardins, Juliana de AG Saraiva, Tiago Maritan, and Juliana Aragão de Araújo. 2022. Towards accessibility for users with autism: a comparative analysis of guidelines. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aguiar, Yuska Paola Costa e Galy, Edith e Godde, Anaïs e Trémaud, Maëla e Tardif, Carole. 2020. AutismGuide: a usability guidelines to design software solutions for users with autism spectrum disorder. Behaviour & Information Technology (2020), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed Alshehri, Malcolm Rutter, and Sally Smith. 2019. Assessing the Relative Importance of an E-Learning System’s Usability Design Characteristics Based on Students’ Preferences.European Journal of Educational Research 8, 3 (2019), 839–855.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association 2014. DSM-5: Manual diagnóstico e estatístico de transtornos mentais. Artmed Editora.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastien, Christian e Scapin, Dominique. 1993. Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces. Ph. D. Dissertation. Inria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Peter Börjesson, Wolmet Barendregt, Eva Eriksson, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. Designing technology for and with developmentally diverse children: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children. 79–88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Talita C Pagani Britto and Ednaldo Brigante Pizzolato. 2014. Proposta de guidelines de interfaces com foco em aspectos do autismo. In Companion Proceedings of the 13th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 37–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Britto, Talita Cristina Pagani and Pizzolato, Ednaldo Brigante. 2018. GAIA: uma proposta de um guia de recomendações de acessibilidade de interfaces Web com foco em aspectos do Autismo. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação 26, 02 (2018), 102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Consórcio World Wide Web (W3C). [n. d.]. Cognitive and learning disabilities accessibility task force (COGA TF) of the AG WG and APA WG. https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/ Disponível em: <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/>. Acesso em 26 de abril de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yuska Paola Costa, Anaïs Godde, Maëla Trémaud, Taciana Pontual, Thomas Arciszewski, Carole Tardif, and Edith Marie Galy. 2022. A survey on accessibility guidelines for users with autism: A broad understanding of the relevance and completeness. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ana Paula de Carvalho, Camila Santana Braz, and Raquel Oliveira Prates. 2022. How are games for autistic children being evaluated?. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Google LLC. [n. d.]. Waze. https://www.waze.com/es-419/company Disponível em: <https://www.waze.com/es-419/company>. Acesso em 8 de maio de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Google LLC. 2010. Angular: The modern web developer?s platform. https://angular.io/ Disponível em: <https://angular.io/>. Acesso em 10 de abril de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Google LLC. 2015. Angular Material UI Component Library. https://material.angular.io Disponível em: <https://material.angular.io>. Acesso em 10 de abril de 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Juan Pablo Hourcade, Stacy R Williams, Ellen A Miller, Kelsey E Huebner, and Lucas J Liang. 2013. Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3197–3206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Muhammad Nazrul Islam, Muimmah Kabir, Jakia Sultana, Chowdhury Nawrin Ferdous, Afsana Zaman, Ummey Habiba Bristy, Priyanka Kundu Moumi, and Iffat Tamanna. 2018. Autism Sohayika: a web portal to provide services to autistic children. In International Conference on Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems. Springer, 181–192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ami Klin. 2006. Autismo e síndrome de Asperger: uma visão geral. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry 28 (2006), s3–s11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Di Liu, Randolph G Bias, Matthew Lease, and Rebecca Kuipers. 2012. Crowdsourcing for usability testing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49, 1 (2012), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Laura Malinverni, Joan Mora-Guiard, Vanesa Padillo, Lilia Valero, Amaia Hervás, and Narcis Pares. 2017. An inclusive design approach for developing video games for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 535–549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ke Mao, Licia Capra, Mark Harman, and Yue Jia. 2017. A survey of the use of crowdsourcing in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software 126 (2017), 57–84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Anna Beatriz Marques and Leandro da Silva Monte. 2021. How are software technologies being evaluated with autistic users? A systematic mapping. Universal Access in the Information Society (2021), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. MongoDB. 2022. MongoDB: A Plataforma De Aplicação de Dados. https://www.mongodb.com/pt-br Disponível em: <https://www.mongodb.com/pt-br>. Acesso em 10 de maio de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen, Jakob e Molich, Rolf. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 249–256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gustavo Maciel Nunes and Yuska Paola Costa Aguiar. 2020. Emotismo: Um aplicativo para auxiliar crianças no espectro autista a reconhecer e reproduzir emoções. In Anais do xxxi simpósio brasileiro de informática na educação. SBC, 692–701.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Talita Cristina Pagani Britto Pichiliani and Ednaldo Brigante Pizzolato. 2021. Cognitive disabilities and web accessibility: a survey into the Brazilian web development community. Journal on Interactive Systems 12, 1 (2021), 308–327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Putnam, Cynthia and Chong, Lorna. 2008. Software and technologies designed for people with autism: what do users want?. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Aubyn C Stahmer, Laura Schreibman, and Allison B Cunningham. 2011. Toward a technology of treatment individualization for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain research 1380 (2011), 229–239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Virnes, Marjo e Kärnä, Eija e Vellonen, Virpi. 2015. Review of research on children with autism spectrum disorder and the use of technology. Journal of Special Education Technology 30, 1 (2015), 13–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wikipedia Foundation Inc. [n. d.]. Wikipedia: a enciclopédia livre. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Disponível em: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page>. Acesso em 8 de maio de 2023..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanan Makki Zakari, Minhua Ma, and David Simmons. 2014. A review of serious games for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In International conference on serious games development and applications. Springer, 93–106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Yuxiang Zhao and Qinghua Zhu. 2014. Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction. Information systems frontiers 16 (2014), 417–434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Digital Resources suiting people on the Autism Spectrum: usability criteria prioritization through crowdsourcing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHC '23: Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          October 2023
          791 pages
          ISBN:9798400717154
          DOI:10.1145/3638067

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 January 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format